Azerbaijan

Last Updated: 18 June 2010

Mine Ban Policy

Mine ban policy overview

Mine Ban Treaty status

Not a State Party

Pro-mine ban UNGA voting record

Voted in favor of Resolution 64/56 in December 2009 for a fifth consecutive year

Participation in Mine Ban Treaty meetings

Did not attend the Second Review Conference in November–December 2009

Policy

The Republic of Azerbaijan has not acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty. It has stated that it supports the goals of the treaty, including a comprehensive ban. But, it “cannot accede to the Ottawa Convention without settlement of the armed conflict, restoration of territorial integrity of the Republic of Azerbaijan, and having a threat of hostility resumption, even though Azerbaijan stopped planting of additional mines.... Therefore adherence to the Ottawa Convention will be possible only after the final settlement of the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia.”[1]

Still, Azerbaijan has demonstrated support for the treaty.  It has voted in favor of the annual UN General Assembly resolution promoting universalization of the treaty every year since 2005, including Resolution 64/56 in December 2009.  Azerbaijan submitted voluntary Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 transparency reports in 2008 and 2009.  While the reports have details about mine clearance, victim assistance, and mine risk education, they do not include any information on Azerbaijan’s stockpiled antipersonnel mines. 

Azerbaijan is not party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons.

Production, transfer, stockpiling, and use

Azerbaijan has stated on several occasions that it does not produce or export antipersonnel mines.[2] Azerbaijan’s landmine stockpile is a legacy of the Soviet era, but the number and types of landmines held are not known.

Officials have stated that Azerbaijan has not used antipersonnel mines since the end of open conflict with Armenia in 1994.  They have also said that while Azerbaijan does not intend to use antipersonnel mines in the future, it does not rule out the possibility.[3]  Azerbaijan apparently has not taken any specific legal measures to prohibit production, trade, or use of antipersonnel mines.



[1] Voluntary Article 7 Report (for the period June 2000–November 2008), Form A.

[2] See, for example, Voluntary Article 7 Report (for the period June 2000–November 2008), Form A.  In June 2005, Azerbaijan said that it is “unilaterally committed to non producing and non accumulating” of antipersonnel mines. Statement of Azerbaijan, Standing Committee on the General Status and Operation of the Convention, Geneva, 13 June 2005.

[3] See Landmine Monitor Report 2006, p. 844. See also, Voluntary Article 7 Report (for the period June 2000–November 2008), Form A.


Last Updated: 19 October 2010

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

Policy

The Republic of Azerbaijan has not acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions. In a May 2010 letter to Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor, Azerbaijan stated, “Because of the ongoing occupation of the native territories of the Republic of Azerbaijan by Republic of Armenia, unfortunately, Azerbaijan cannot join the Convention on Cluster Munitions at this stage.…”[1] 

Azerbaijan participated in some of the Oslo Process meetings that led to the creation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, including the European Regional Conference on Cluster Munitions in Brussels and the Belgrade Conference for States Affected by Cluster Munitions in October 2007 and the Vienna Conference on Cluster Munitions in December 2007.[2]   

However, Azerbaijan did not attend the formal negotiations in Dublin in May 2008 or the Convention on Cluster Munitions Signing Conference in Oslo in December 2008. It has not participated in any regional or international cluster munition meetings in 2009 or 2010 through July.

The Azerbaijan Campaign to Ban Landmines (AzCBL) has been active in engaging the government on the issue of cluster munitions. According to the AzCBL, the line of argument that has been adopted by the Azerbaijani government is that as a stockpiler of cluster munitions, Azerbaijan cannot accede to a treaty banning the weapon as long as the prospect of renewed armed conflict remains a possibility. It can only consider accession to the convention after a resolution to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.[3]

Azerbaijan is not party to the Mine Ban Treaty or the Convention on Conventional Weapons.

Use, production, transfer, and stockpiling

Azerbaijan is not known to have produced or exported cluster munitions. It inherited a stockpile of cluster munitions from the Soviet Union. Jane’s Information Group reports that RBK-250/275 and RBK-500 cluster bombs are in service with the country’s air force.[4]  RBK-250 bombs with PTAB submunitions were among the abandoned Soviet-era ammunition stockpiles located near the village of Saloglu in the northwestern part of the country.[5] Azerbaijan also possesses Grad 122mm surface-to-surface rockets, but it is not known if these include versions with submunition payloads.[6]

Cluster Munition Remnants

In 2006 and 2007, remnants from abandoned cluster munitions were found in and around warehouses at a former Soviet ammunition storage area located at Saloglu in Agstafa district. None have since been encountered.[7]

Submunition contamination has been identified in Nagorno-Karabakh, a territory claimed by Azerbaijan but occupied and under the control of a breakaway government after the 1988–1994 conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia.[8] It is unclear which country’s forces used cluster munitions in this conflict.  

There are also reports of contamination in other parts of occupied Azerbaijan, adjacent to Nagorno-Karabakh, namely the Fizuli, Terter, and Tovuz districts.[9]

Clearance of cluster munition remnants

No unexploded submunitions were cleared by Azerbaijan in 2009.[10]

 



[1] Letter No. 115/10/L from Amb. Dr. Murad N. Najafbayli, Permanent Mission of the Republic of Azerbaijan to the UN in Geneva, to the CMC, 10 May 2010. 

[2] For more details, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), p. 188.

[3] AzCBL, “Cluster Munitions in Azerbaijan,” undated, www.azcbl.org.

[4] Robert Hewson, ed., Jane’s Air-Launched Weapons, Issue 44 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2004), p. 835.

[5] Human Rights Watch field visit to Saloglu, May 2005.

[6] International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2005–2006 (London: Routledge, 2005), p. 111; and Colin King, ed., Jane’s Explosive Ordnance Disposal 2007–2008, CD-edition, 15 January 2008 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2008).

[7] In 2006 at Saloglu, 16 “9M 27 K” cluster munition rockets were discovered (each rocket has 24 submunitions). In 2007, 181 cluster munition artillery shells “Z-O-13” were destroyed (each item has eight submunitions). Email from Parviz Gidayev, UXO Officer, Operations Department, Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action (ANAMA), 2 April 2010.

[8] Nagorno-Karabakh is not recognized by any UN member state. Prior to the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the Parliament of the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Province voted in 1988 to secede from the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic (SSR) and join the Armenian SSR, which resulted in armed conflict from 1988–1994. The region declared independence as the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic in 1991.

[9] AzCBL, “Cluster Munitions in Azerbaijan,” undated, www.azcbl.org.

[10] Email from Parviz Gidayev, ANAMA, 2 April 2010.


Last Updated: 18 June 2010

Mine Action

Contamination and Impact

Mines

Azerbaijan is contaminated by mines and explosive remnants of war (ERW), primarily as a result of armed conflict with Armenia in 1988–1994. A general survey of contamination was undertaken in 2001, followed by a Landmine Impact Survey (LIS) in 18 districts carried out from September 2002 to June 2003. The LIS identified 480 mine-impacted communities and 163 ERW-impacted communities in 18 districts. In total, 970 suspected hazardous areas (SHAs) covering 736km2 of land were found to be affecting 514,000 people.[1]

In late 2006, the Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action (ANAMA) significantly reduced the overall estimate of contamination to 306km2, based on a survey conducted with the support of local authorities of the 11 most heavily mine/ERW-affected districts.[2] This revised figure included areas not identified by the LIS. Additional new SHAs have since been identified by re-survey by ANAMA but land release had reduced the overall SHA to 184km2 as of the end of 2009. This was spread across 280 SHAs of which 89 were believed to be mined areas.[3]

The precise extent of the mine/ERW problem in areas of Azerbaijan occupied by Armenia is unknown. In addition to Nagorno-Karabakh (see the Profile for Nagorno-Karabakh), which was occupied by Armenian forces during the conflict between the two countries, the districts of Gubadly, Jabrayil, Kelbajar, Lachin, and Zangilan, as well as parts of Aghdam, Fizuli, and Terter are under the control of Armenian forces. These areas are expected to have extensive mine/ERW contamination with estimates of the total size of affected areas varying from 350km2 to 830km2.[4]

Cluster munition remnants

Azerbaijan is affected by cluster munition remnants. In the summer of 2007, the Azerbaijan Campaign to Ban Landmines (AzCBL) conducted a data collection project to survey cluster munition contamination in Azerbaijan’s non-occupied border regions. It concluded that cluster munitions had been used in Aghdam, Aghdara, and Fizuli districts/regions.[5]

Significant contamination from cluster munition remnants has also been identified in Nagorno-Karabakh (see the Profile for Nagorno-Karabakh).[6] In 2006 and 2007, cluster munition remnants were found in and around warehouses at a former Soviet ammunition storage area (ASA) located at Saloglu in Agstafa district. None have since been encountered.

Other explosive remnants of war

There are also other areas confirmed or suspected to contain ERW, including both UXO and abandoned explosive ordnance (AXO). Re-survey of SHAs concluded that as of the end of 2009, 191 SHAs contained UXO.[7]

With respect to AXO, and despite ongoing clearance efforts, there remains significant contamination in and around warehouses at the former Soviet ASA at Saloglu. The ASA, which consisted of 138 bunkers, was the largest Soviet warehouse in the southern Caucasus. In 1991, when Azerbaijan gained independence, the warehouse was blown up by the departing Soviet army.[8] Since the explosion, which scattered stored munitions, 152 incidents have reportedly killed 32 people and injured 91 others.[9]

There is also another AXO/UXO problem in Guzdek village in Garadakh district, 20 minutes drive from the capital, Baku. Also, as a result of an ASA being blown up in 1991, thousands of items of ordnance were scattered over a large area. It is suspected that contamination includes antipersonnel mines.[10] Since the explosion 10 incidents are said to have killed two people and injured two others.[11]

Mine Action Program

Key institutions and operators

Body

Situation on 1 January 2010

National Mine Action Authority/Mine action center

ANAMA

International demining operators

None

National demining operators

ANAMA

Dayag

International Eurasia Press Fund

International risk education operators

None

 National risk education operators

ANAMA

 

ANAMA was established in 1998 as the national entity mandated to oversee all aspects of mine action activities in Azerbaijan under the supervision of the State Commission for Reconstruction and Rehabilitation. A Joint Working Group, established in December 1999 and consisting of representatives from various ministries, previously supported the coordination of mine action in the country[12] but has not met since 2005 as it proved to be more effective for ANAMA to deal with concerned ministries and state bodies on a bilateral basis.[13]

ANAMA has its headquarters in Baku, a regional office in Fizuli, a Regional Mine Action Resource and Training Center in Goygol, and three operational centers, in Agjabedi, Agstafa, and Terter. As of the end of 2009, ANAMA had 547 employees of whom 253 were operational staff. In addition, it had 32 mine detection dogs (MDDs) and six demining machines.[14]

There are two strategic plans being pursued by the mine action program. The first is a short-term plan to release 306km2 of SHAs in accessible areas by the end of 2013.[15] As of the end of 2009, 184km2 remained to be released. ANAMA planned to clear/reduce approximately 12km2 and cancel about 14.5km2 by the end of 2010.[16] The second plan is a longer term strategy by which ANAMA plans to increase its operational and management capacity to enable it to address the mine and ERW threat from the occupied areas once they are returned to Azerbaijan.[17]   

UNDP manages a trust fund for mine action in Azerbaijan, but has not provided a technical advisor since 2005.[18] In May 2009, UNDP and signed an agreement to extend cooperation for a further three years.[19]

Recent program evaluations

In June 2009, UNDP conducted a study of the feasibility of establishing an international mine action center in Azerbaijan.[20] The main purpose was to assess ANAMA’s capacities to deliver international mine action training. According to the draft report, “ANAMA is highly conscious of the need to maintain a strong operational capacity in areas critical to its planning, quality management and technical guidance functions, and has been progressively acquiring a comprehensive range of mine action assets that will allow it to perform these roles effectively and efficiently.”[21]

Land Release

Mine clearance is conducted by two national NGOs—Dayag (“Relief Azerbaijan”) and the International Eurasia Press Fund (IEPF)—and ANAMA. Together, they employ 158 demining personnel.[22]

ANAMA has embraced a land release approach. A new standing operating procedure (SOP) for land release was developed in July 2009 and was in use in Aghdam, Agjabedi, Fizuli, and Terter regions for a trial period of one year.[23] According to the new system, depending on the threat level, land is classified to three categories: low, medium, and high threat areas. Each type of threat level now has its own clearance methodology, using one or a combination of demining tools.[24]

Five-year summary of land release[25]

Year

Mined area cleared (km2)

Suspected mined area cancelled and released by survey (km2)

Battle area cleared (km2)

2009

9.24

19.72

10.21

2008

1.46

25.70

3.11

2007

2.12

12.22

4.11

2006

2.07

12.53

5.47

2005

1.85

2.36

3.00

Total

16.74

72.53

25.90

 

Survey in 2009

ANAMA continues to revise the estimate of contamination using the Resurvey Team from its Training, Survey and Quality Assurance Division (TSQAD).[26] There are also four technical survey teams.[27] Non-technical survey in 2009 released more than 12km2 of SHAs while technical survey released a further 7.6km2. In 2008, a total of 11.6km2 of SHA was released by non-technical survey, with technical survey releasing a further 14.1km2.[28]

Survey in 2009[29]

Operator

Area covered by non-technical survey (km2)

Area cancelled by non-technical survey (km2)

Area covered by technical survey (km2)

Area released by technical survey (km2)

ANAMA

12.15

12.15

16.17

5.99

IEPF

0

0

1.82

0.70

Dayag

0

0

1.46

0.87

Total

12.15

12.15

19.45

7.56

 

Mine clearance in 2009

In 2009, Azerbaijan cleared almost 1.67km2 of mined areas, with the destruction of only 90 mines, suggesting a very low density of contamination (see table below). Particular achievements included completion of clearance of mined areas in Zobjuq in Fizuli region. This operation resulted in building of the settlement for repatriation of 2,200 internally displaced families.[30] IEPF conducted clearance in Gorandoy, Goygol, and Terter regions while Dayag conducted clearance in Aghdam region.[31] In 2008, 1.46km2 of mined areas were cleared.

As of the end of 2009, total mine clearance capacity consisted of the following: three 38-strong manual demining teams, six demining machines, and 32 MDDs and their handlers.[32]

Mine clearance in 2009[33]

Operator

Mined area cleared (m2)

No. of antipersonnel mines destroyed

No. of antivehicle mines destroyed

No. of UXO destroyed during mine clearance

ANAMA

368,709

45

24

232

IEPF

713,746

1

6

381

Dayag

585,344

0

14

58

Total

1,667,799

46

44

671

 

Clearance of cluster munition contaminated area in 2009

No cluster munition remnants were cleared in 2009. In 2006 at Saloglu, 16 “9M 27 K” cluster munition rockets were discovered (each rocket has 24 submunitions). In 2007, 181 cluster munition artillery shells “Z-O-13” were destroyed (each item has eight submunitions). During 2008 and 2009 no cluster munition remnants were found at Saloglu.[34]

Battle area clearance in 2009

On 10 June 2009, ANAMA began clearance of the abandoned ASA in Guzdek village.[35] During subsequent operations, ANAMA’s Special Operations Team (created specifically for the Guzdek clearance project) cleared 1,336,253m2 of land, destroying in the process 33 antipersonnel mines and 3,228 items of ERW.[36]

On 1 April 2009, the third phase of the NATO Partnership for Peace Trust Fund project “Clearance of UXO in Saloglu, Azerbaijan” started. This phase envisages subsurface clearance of the “Red Zone” (a designated clearance area closer to the center of the ASA) and destruction of all items of UXO awaiting open burning and open detonation processes by April 2011. The ANAMA UXO Operations Team, set up for the clearance project at Saloglu, drafted a new standing operating procedure, “Abandoned Ammunition Storage Area Clearance SOP,” which was subsequently approved by senior ANAMA officials and has since been applied in the clearance operations.[37]

In total, during 2009 ANAMA cleared 406,987m2 in Saloglu, destroying 199,888 items of AXO.[38] Also during 2009 ANAMA’s Emergency Response Team cleared 148 houses, schools, kindergartens, factory yards, and cultural/religious sites. In total 4,463,176m2 of land was released, with the destruction of 673 items of UXO and four antivehicle mines.[39] Other clearance operations were conducted in Agstafa and Fizuli regions.[40] 

Battle area clearance in 2009[41]

Operator

Battle area cleared (m2)

No. of UXO destroyed

No. of AXO destroyed

ANAMA

9,809,363*

1,221

203,116

IEPF

404,875

1

0

Dayag

0

0

0

Total

10,214,238

1,222

203,116

* This figure includes 1,743,240m2 cleared within Saloglu and Guzdek.

Safety of demining personnel

No injuries occurred to demining personnel in 2009.[42]

Quality management

Internal quality assurance (QA) is carried out by the team engaged in clearance while external QA is the sole responsibility of ANAMA’s TSQAD. This consists of the division head, one Sampling QA/QC Team (one team leader, one section leader, six deminers, and two drivers) with MDDs and handlers where needed. Quality control (QC) is conducted immediately after clearance is completed, through a process of sampling on up to 50% of the cleared land.[43] Given this capacity, ANAMA has now stopped using the “exchange method” in which one demining team was used to conduct external QA/QC of an area cleared by another team.[44]

A total of 186 monitoring missions were conducted during 2009. Based on the Clearance Completion Reports, external QC checks were conducted by the TSQAD on 32 sites (2.5km2) of which 18 were minefields (1km2) and 14 battle areas (1.5km2). Most of the QC checks were implemented by the Sampling Team consisting of six deminers, a team leader and a section leader, as well as two MDD groups.[45]

Other Risk Reduction Measures

In 2009, mine/ERW risk education (RE) activities were implemented by ANAMA mine/ERW risk education department officers, clearance groups (when conditions do not allow them to engage in demining), and ANAMA’s two implementing NGO partners: Dayag and IEPF. RE was also conducted in schools; 52,000 students in 1,200 schools are said to have received information about the dangers of mines/ERW. ANAMA established RE committees in one new district (Tovuz), so the total number of established RE committees across nine districts reached 134. As a result of reports by local residents, including children, 58 mines and 468 items of UXO were located and destroyed, and some former military bases were marked to warn people against entering.[46]



[1] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 7.

[2] Telephone interview with Murad Rahimov, Information Manager, Information Department, ANAMA, 10 June 2010.

[3] Interview with Shamil Yagizarov, Information Systems Officer, Information Department, ANAMA, Baku, 29 April 2010.

[4] Voluntary Article 7 Report (for the period November 2008 to April 2009), Form A.

[5] AzCBL, “Information Bulletin”, January 2008.

[6] Interview with Nazim Ismayilov, Director, ANAMA, Baku, 2 April 2010; see also Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice, Mines Action Canada, May 2009, p. 188.

[7] Interview with Shamil Yagizarov, ANAMA, Baku, 29 April 2010.

[8] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 20.

[9] Interview with Murad Rahimov, ANAMA, Baku, 29 April 2010.

[10] ANAMA, “ANAMA conducts clearance operations in Guzdek settlement,” 15 June 2009, www.anama.baku.az.

[11] Interview with Murad Rahimov, ANAMA, Baku, 29 April 2010.

[12] Email from Nigar Azimova, Planning and Development Manager, ANAMA, 4 April 2010.

[13] Interview with Nazim Ismayilov, ANAMA, Baku, 2 April 2010.

[14] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 12.

[15] Interview with Nigar Azimova, ANAMA, Baku, 30 April 2010.

[16] Email from Nigar Azimova, ANAMA, 27 May 2010.

[17] Interview with Nazim Ismayilov, ANAMA, Baku, 2 April 2010.

[18] Ibid, 19 June 2008.

[19] ANAMA, “ANAMA to become an International Mine Action Centre,” 24 May 2009, www.anama.gov.

[20] Email from Nigar Vagabova, Planning and Development Officer, ANAMA, 6 July 2009.

[21] Bruce Powell, “Report on the Feasibility of ANAMA establishing an International Centre for Mine Action in Goygol, Azerbaijan,” 13 August 2009, p. 7.

[22] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 12; and interview with Tural Mammadov, Operations Officer, Operations Department, ANAMA, 29 April 2010.

[23] Interview with Tural Mammadov, ANAMA, Baku, 29 April 2010.

[24] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 16.

[25] Email from Tural Mammadov, ANAMA, 18 May 2010. The figures are rounded, so may differ slightly from those reported in previous Landmine Monitor reports.

[26] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 7.

[27] Email from Samir Poladov, Manager, Operations Department, ANAMA, 12 April 2010.

[28] Interview with Tural Mammadov, ANAMA, Baku, 29 April 2010.

[29] Ibid.

[30] Email from Samir Poladov, ANAMA, 12 April 2010.

[31] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 10.

[32] Email from Samir Poladov, ANAMA, 12 April 2010.

[33] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 10.

[34] Email from Parviz Gidayev, UXO Officer, Operations Department, ANAMA, 2 April 2010.

[35] ANAMA, “ANAMA conducts clearance operations in Guzdek settlement,” 15 June 2009, www.anama.baku.az.

[36] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 10.

[37] Email from Tural Mammadov, ANAMA, 12 April 2010.

[38] Ibid.

[39] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 10.

[40] Email from Tural Mammadov, ANAMA, 7 June 2010.

[41] Ibid, 12 April 2010.

[42] Interview with Tural Mammadov, ANAMA, Baku, 29 April 2010.

[43] Interview with Elnur Gasimov, TSQAD Leader, Goygol Regional Mine Action Resource and Training Center, ANAMA, Goygol, 12 April 2010.

[44] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Elnur Gasimov, ANAMA, 19 June 2009.

[45] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 16.

[46] Email from Musa Jalalov, Manager, Mine Risk Education Department, ANAMA, 12 April 2010.


Last Updated: 18 June 2010

Casualties and Victim Assistance

Casualties

Casualties in 2009

Casualties in 2009

22 (2008: 11)

Casualties by outcome

4 killed; 18 injured (2008: 11 injured)

Casualties by device type

4 antipersonnel mines; 14 antivehicle mines; 4 ERW

 

The Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action (ANAMA) reported 22 mine/explosive remnants of war (ERW) casualties in 16 incidents in 2009. All casualties were male. Four men were killed, another 17 were injured, and one child was injured. Four casualties were military personnel (three killed and one injured).[1] This represents an increase from the 11 people injured by mines/ERW in 2008 as reported by ANAMA.[2]

As in past years, in 2009 the casualty data collected by the Azerbaijan Campaign to Ban Landmines (AzCBL) differed from that of ANAMA in methodology and results. AzCBL reported 34 mine/ERW casualties in Azerbaijan for 2009.[3] This represented an increase from the 23 mine/ERW casualties (one person killed and 22 injured) reported by AzCBL for 2008.[4]

As of the end of 2009, ANAMA reported a total of 2,360 mine/ERW casualties (363 people killed and 1,997 injured) in Azerbaijan since the early 1990s.[5]

Victim Assistance

In 2009, there were at least 1,839 mine/ERW survivors known to be living in Azerbaijan.[6] Efforts to assists survivors through state and NGO services continued without significant change in 2009.

Survivor needs

The Azerbaijan Red Crescent Society (AzRCS) collected and shared data on mine/ERW survivors of incidents occurring in 2009 for use in victim assistance activities by ANAMA/Azerbaijan Mine Victim Association (AMVA) and other NGOs under ANAMA administration.[7] ANAMA continued to use and update information from the 2004 mine survivors’ needs assessment survey for both project planning and implementation purposes.[8] AzCBL used its own sources in addition to ANAMA data to plan and implement victim assistance activities.[9]

Victim assistance coordination[10]

Government coordinating body/ focal point

ANAMA: Fundraised for victim assistance services; implemented programs for mine/ERW survivors; managed the AMVA

Coordinating mechanism

Mine Victim Assistance Working Group: ANAMA held several coordination meetings including national NGOs, the AzRCS and other relevant organizations to address challenges and develop plans

Plan

Mine Victim Assistance Strategic Plan: The 2004 plan was revised in 2008 and was under review in 2009

 

In 2009 ANAMA coordinated victim assistance activities in accordance with the Mine Victim Assistance Strategic Plan and prepared future projects.[11] In late 2009, ANAMA expressed the need for the enhancement of victim assistance coordination by expanding community involvement and incorporating community monitoring and advocacy activities.[12]

The Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of Population (MLSPP) and the Ministry of Health are responsible for protecting the rights of persons with disabilities more generally.[13]

Survivor inclusion

Mine/ERW survivors are included in planning and implementation of victim assistance through the AMVA.[14] Mine survivors collect information and implement projects of the AzCBL.[15]

Service accessibility and effectiveness

Victim assistance activities in 2009[16]

Name of organization

Type of organization

Type of activity

Changes in quality/coverage of service in 2009

MLSPP

Government

Rehabilitation and prostheses

Decrease in prosthetics production

Rehabilitation Center of Invalids of the Republic in Baku/MLSPP

Government

Rehabilitation, diagnostic, and psychosocial support

Two-thirds decrease in the number of survivors assisted

AzRCS

National NGO

Social support to families of mine casualties

One family received support

AzCBL

National NGO

Economic inclusion: microfinance projects; legal awareness for mine/ERW survivors and families

More than 50% increase in the number of beneficiaries

ANAMA/AMVA

Government/National NGOs

Provided services through national NGOs including micro-credit, wheelchairs, and equipment

Additional wheelchairs distributed to survivors in need; other activities ongoing (as below)

Chirag Humanitarian Development Public Union /International Organization for Migration (IOM)/International Trust Fund for Demining and Mine Victims Assistance (ITF)

National NGO/International organization

Micro-credit and small business training in six districts

97% repayment rate for micro-credit loans in 2009; the program continued and expanded

The Social and Psychological Rehabilitation Center of the Youth – “Dirchelish”/ANAMA

National NGO

Equal opportunities in employment and education for young mine survivors

More mine survivors received education opportunities than in 2008

Ojag Humanitarian Union

National NGO

Economic inclusion: training and business planning by Ganja City Regional Resource Center

Project trainees graduated in 2009 and received job placements; additional equipment was supplied

 

No significant changes in the quality of services were reported for 2009 and most programs continued from the previous year.

Overall, prosthetic and rehabilitation services to mine/ERW survivors decreased in 2009. Three of the four MLSPP-run rehabilitation centers provided fewer services. The three centers formerly supported by the ICRC reported the smallest reduction in services: the Ahmedly Prosthetic Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center in Baku decreased outputs for survivors by some 16%;[17] the Nakhichivan satellite center provided less than half the number of prostheses for mine/ERW survivors;[18] and the center in the mine-affected area of Ganja increased its assistance to mine/ERW survivors slightly.[19] The Rehabilitation Center of Invalids of the Republic in Baku, which assists the largest number of mine/ERW survivors, provided services to fewer survivors in 2009 than 2008. However, the number of survivors assisted was consistent with years prior to 2008. There was no progress in addressing the training and infrastructure needs identified by the center in early 2009.[20]

In 2009, there continued to be few mental health institutions in conflict-affected districts offering specific services to mine/ERW survivors and other people with disabilities.[21]

In 2009, NGOs increased the level of economic inclusion and education services for mine/ERW survivors provided through local projects with donor support, though economic inclusion remained a significant need. The local NGO Chirag Humanitarian Development Public Union began the second phase of its micro-credit program with new beneficiaries.[22] AzCBL significantly increased the number of mine/ERW survivor beneficiaries as well as its assistance to family members of victims.[23]

While the law prohibits discrimination against persons with disabilities in employment, education, access to health care, and the provision of other state services, discrimination in employment remained a problem.[24]

Azerbaijan ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol on 28 January 2009.



[1] ANAMA, “Mine /UXO Victims Reported,” Monthly Report February 2009, www.anama.baku.az; ANAMA, “Mine /UXO Victims Reported,” Monthly Report January 2010, www.anama.gov.az; interview with Vagif Sadigov, Mine Risk Education Assistant, ANAMA, Baku, 17 March 2010; and data provided by email from Imran Safaraliyev, Mine Victim Assistance Officer, ANAMA, 21 May 2010.

[2] ANAMA, “Mine /UXO Victims Reported,” Monthly Report February 2009, www.anama.baku.az; and ANAMA, “Mine /UXO Victims Reported,” Monthly Report January 2010, www.anama.gov.az. Landmine Monitor Report 2009 recorded ANAMA’s report of three mine/ERW casualties (all injured) for 2008. Data provided by email from Murad Rahimov, Information Manager, Information Department, ANAMA, 3 July 2009; 9 July 2009; 13 July 2009; and 14 July 2009.

[3] AzCBL collects casualty information from governmental sources, regional coordinators, and elsewhere. Of the 24 civilian casualties, one was killed and 23 were injured; in addition four soldiers were killed and six were injured. Antipersonnel mines caused 13 casualties, antivehicle mines eight, and ERW 11. Email from Hafiz Safikhanov, Director, AzCBL, 13 January 2010.

[4] Email from Hafiz Safikhanov, Director, AzCBL, 23 June 2009.

[5] ANAMA, Monthly Report January 2010, p. 3, www.anama.baku.az.

[6] ANAMA, “Mine Victim Assistance, one of the pillars of the Humanitarian Mine Action,” www.anama.gov.az. The total was calculated by ANAMA through victim assistance projects and cross checking of the casualty database.

[7] Email from Bayram Valiyev, Weapon Contamination Advisor, AzRCS, 12 March 2010.

[8] ANAMA, “Mine Victim Assistance, one of the pillars of the Humanitarian Mine Action,” www.anama.gov.az.

[9] Email from Hafiz Safikhanov, AzCBL, 31 March 2010.

[10] ANAMA, “Mine Victim Assistance, one of the pillars of the Humanitarian Mine Action,” www.anama.gov.az; and email from Imran Safaraliyev, Mine Victim Assistance Officer, ANAMA, 21 May 2010.

[11] Responses to Monitor questionnaire by Imran Safaraliyev, ANAMA, 22 June 2009 and 21 May 2010.

[12] UN, “2010 Portfolio of Mine Action Projects,” New York, November 2009, p. 38.

[13] US Department of State, “2009 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Azerbaijan,” Washington, DC, 11 March 2010.

[14] ANAMA, “Mine Victim Assistance, one of the pillars of the Humanitarian Mine Action,” www.anama.gov.az. See also Nick Nwolisa, International Eurasia Press Fund, “Azerbaijan Mine Victim Association: The Story So Far,” Journal of Mine Action, Issue 12.1, Summer 2008, maic.jmu.edu.

[15] Email from Hafiz Safikhanov, AzCBL, 31 March 2010.

[16] Interview with Abdulla Abdullayev, Deputy Director, Ahmedly Prosthetic Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center, Baku, 16 March 2010; telephone interview with Mubariz Rustamli, Nakhichivan Prosthetic and Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center, 17 March 2010; interview with Ilham Bagirov, Director, Ahmedly Prosthetic Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center, Baku, 17 March 2010; interview with Seadat Mahmudova, Head Physician, Rehabilitation Center of Invalids of the Republic, Baku, 16 March 2010; IOM Azerbaijan, “Socio-Economic Reintegration Programme for Mine Victims in Azerbaijan,” iom.az; email from Hafiz Safikhanov, AzCBL, 31 March 2010; ITF, “Annual Report 2009”, Ljubljana, 2010, pp. 79–80; telephone interview with Islam Bakhshaliyev, Director, Dirchelish, 30 March 2010; email from Bayram Valiyev, AzRCS, 12 March 2010; and email from Imran Safaraliyev, ANAMA, 21 May 2010.

[17] Interview with Abdulla Abdullayev, Ahmedly Prosthetic Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center, Baku, 16 March 2010.

[18] Telephone interview with Mubariz Rustamli, Nakhichivan Prosthetic and Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center, 17 March 2010.

[19] Interview with Ilham Bagirov, Ahmedly Prosthetic Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center, Baku, 17 March 2010.

[20] These needs included providing training of medical staff, wheelchairs and functional hospital beds, and expanding the center from its 50-bed capacity in 2009 by adding up to 150 beds. Interviews with Seadat Mahmudova, Rehabilitation Center of Invalids of the Republic, Baku, 16 March 2009 and 16 March 2010.

[21] UN, “2010 Portfolio of Mine Action Projects,” New York, November 2009, p. 41.

[22] IOM Azerbaijan, “Socio-Economic Reintegration Programme for Mine Victims in Azerbaijan,” om.az. The project was supported by the IOM, ITF, and ANAMA.

[23] Email from Hafiz Safikhanov, AzCBL, 31 March 2010.

[24] US Department of State, “2009 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Azerbaijan,” Washington, DC, 11 March 2010.


Last Updated: 21 June 2010

Support for Mine Action

From 2005–2009 the government of Azerbaijan provided more than half the country’s mine action budget of US$34,870,639 including almost 80% ($14,399,293 out of $18,298,763) of the 2008–2009 budget.[1]

National contributions: 2009

Year

Sector

Amount ($)

2009

Operations, clearance, risk education, victim assistance

8,086,793

2008

Operations, clearance, risk education, victim assistance

6,312,500

2007

Operations, clearance, risk education, victim assistance

2,235,296

2006

Operations, clearance, risk education, victim assistance

1,241,379

2005

Operations, clearance, risk education, victim assistance

749,561

Total

 

18,625,529

 

International contributions: 2009

Donor

Sector

Amount ($)

UNDP

ANAMA Baku and regional operations

300,000

United States

Clearance, victim assistance

483,000

NATO Partnership for Peace

Clearance

1,393,208

Total

 

2,176,208

 

Summary of contributions: 2005–2009

Year

National contributions ($)

International contributions ($)

2009

8,086,793

2,176,208

2008

6,312,500

1,723,262

2007

2,235,296

3,713,903

2006

1,241,379

4,530,961

2005

749,561

4,100,776

Total

18,625,529

16,245,110

 

 

 



[1] ANAMA, “Annual Report 2010,” p. 5.