Chile

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

Last updated: 21 July 2016

Summary: State Party Chile ratified the convention on 16 December 2010. It hosted an international conference on the convention in Santiago in June 2010, and regional meetings on cluster munitions in 2009 and 2013. Chile has participated in all of the convention’s meetings and has served as the convention’s co-coordinator on victim assistance since September 2015. Chile was a lead sponsor on a UN resolution on the convention in December 2015. It has condemned new use of cluster munitions, including in South Sudan, Syria, and Ukraine.

Chile is a former producer and exporter of cluster munitions. In July 2013, Chile completed the destruction of a stockpile of 249 cluster munitions and 25,896 submunitions.

Policy

The Republic of Chile signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 3 December 2008, ratified on 16 December 2010, and the convention entered into force for the country on 1 June 2011.

Chile has reported existing legislation including its 2010 ratification law under national implementation measures for the convention. It is unclear if Chile considers these laws as sufficient to enforce implementation of the convention’s provisions or if it intends to undertake specific legislative measures. In 2012, Chile reported that the Ministry of National Defense was establishing a body “to centralize, coordinate and execute the operational and administrative tasks” required by the convention.[1]

Chile submitted its initial Article 7 transparency report for the Convention on Cluster Munitions in September 2012 and provided an annual updated report in September 2013.[2] As of 10 July 2016, Chile had not provided any more of the annual updates due by 30 April.

Chile participated in the Oslo Process that produced the Convention on Cluster Munitions, advocating for the most comprehensive provisions possible.[3]

Chile has engaged actively in the work of the convention since 2008, hosting an international conference on the convention in Santiago in June 2010 and regional conferences in September 2009 and December 2013.

Chile participated in the First Review Conference of the Convention on Cluster Munitions in Dubrovnik, Croatia in September 2015. In an address to the high-level segment of the meeting, Chile found that “there are not military, political, and above all, ethical reasons for any actor to use cluster munitions under any circumstance.”[4]

Chile has participated in all of the convention’s Meetings of States Parties as well as intersessional meetings in Geneva in 2011–2015. It hosted a regional workshop on cluster munitions in Santiago in December 2013 that 24 Latin American and Caribbean states attended, including non-signatories Argentina, Cuba, Saint Lucia, and the United States (US).[5]

Chile served as the convention’s co-coordinator on cooperation and assistance in 2013–2015. At the First Review Conference, Chile was named the convention’s co-coordinator on victim assistance together with Australia.

Chile was a lead sponsor on and voted in favor of a UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolution on the convention on 7 December 2015, which urges all states not party to the convention to join “as soon as possible.”[6] A total of 140 states voted in favor of the non-binding resolution, including many non-signatories.

Chile has condemned new use of cluster munitions on several occasions, including in Ukraine, South Sudan, and Syria. As a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council, Chile has expressed concern at the use of cluster munitions in Ukraine.[7] In June 2015, Chile voted in favor of a Security Council resolution expressing concern at evidence of cluster munition use by the government of Sudan and reiterating a call for an investigation.[8] Chile voted in favor of a May 2014 resolution, which expressed concern at the use of cluster munitions in South Sudan and called on “all parties to refrain from similar such use in the future.”[9] Chile has voted in favor of UNGA resolutions condemning the use of cluster munitions in Syria, most recently in December 2015.[10]

Interpretive issues

During the Oslo Process, Chile did not favor including language on “interoperability” (joint military operations with states not party that may use cluster munitions) in the convention.[11] In 2012, a Ministry of National Defense official informed the Monitor that the convention’s Article 21 language does not prevent Chile from conducting military training exercises with states not party, but emphasized that Chile would require that states participating in exercises not use cluster munitions in the exercises (and would communicate this requirement via a written order sent to officials involved).[12]

Chile has yet to elaborate its views on other important issues relating to the interpretation and implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, such as the prohibition on transit, the prohibition on foreign stockpiling of cluster munitions, and the prohibition on investment in production of cluster munitions.

Chile is a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty. It is also party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons.

Use

Chile is not known to have used cluster munitions in a conflict situation. In 2011, the Ministry of National Defense informed the Monitor that Chile stopped using cluster munitions in training exercises in 2008.[13]

Production and transfer

During the Oslo Process in September 2007, Chile stated that it no longer produced cluster munitions and did not intend to produce the weapon in the future.[14] In the past, Industrias Cardeon SA and Los Conquistadores 1700 were reported to have produced at least eight types of air-dropped cluster bombs: CB-130 bomb, CB-250K bomb, CB-500 bomb, CB-500K bomb, CB-500K2 bomb, CB-770 bomb, WB-250F bomb, and WB-500F bomb.[15]

In the initial Article 7 report provided in 2012, Chile indicated that it was in the process of verifying information on measures taken to dismantle its cluster munition production facilities and stated that it could not provide a complete accounting of the “models manufactured, their total amount or destination of transfer.”[16] The updated report submitted in September 2013 provided no additional information on past production or transfer of cluster munitions.

However, in 2012 Chile’s Ministry of National Defense provided the Monitor with a detailed accounting of Chile’s past transfers of cluster munitions. One document shown to the Monitor details Chilean exports of cluster munitions in the period from 1991 to 2001 to the following five countries:[17]

  • Brazil in 1999 and 2001 (various types);
  • Colombia in 1994 (55 250kg cluster bombs, four air-dropped 250kg cluster bombs, and one fin stabilizer for a CB-250kg cluster bomb) and in 1997 (132 250kg cluster bombs);
  • Turkey in 1996 (four CB-250kg cluster bombs);
  • United Arab Emirates in 1998 (four “empty” [“vacías”] CB-500kg cluster bombs and two CB-500kg cluster bombs filled with lead shot); and
  • US in 1991 (one 250kg cluster bomb and one 500kg cluster bomb).

In a May 2012 document provided to the Monitor, the director-general of National Mobilization, Brigadier General Roberto Ziegele Kerber, stated that there were “no other applications or new exports authorizations for these devices” after the year 2001.[18] This data accounts for cluster munitions exported from Chile in the period after 1980, but it does not provide any information on exports in period from 1980–1991.[19]

Colombia reported the destruction of its stockpile of 41 Chilean CB-250K bombs in March 2009.[20]

PM-1 combined-effect submunitions delivered by bombs produced in Chile have been found in Eritrea, Ethiopia, Iraq, and Sudan.[21] A number of CB-250 bombs were found in the arsenal of Iraq by UN weapons inspectors, who noted that Iraq had modified them to deliver chemical weapons in the submunitions.[22]

Stockpile destruction

In its initial Article 7 report provided in 2012, Chile declared a stockpile of 249 LARS-160 surface-launched rockets equipped with Mk-II cluster munition warheads containing 25,896 submunitions.[23]

Under Article 3 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Chile was required to declare and destroy all stockpiled cluster munitions under its jurisdiction and control no later than 1 June 2019.

Chile completed destruction of the stockpile in July 2013 and announced the completion two months later at the convention’s Fourth Meeting of States Parties. It offered to share its experience and provide technical assistance to countries requesting support for their stockpile destruction efforts in “the spirit of cooperation that guides the convention.”[24]

Chile has provided detailed information on the destruction of its stockpile that the Army’s Fabrica y Maestranza del Ejercito (FAMAE) carried out in Arica Parinacota in the north of the country between 17 June and 12 July 2013.[25] The stocks were destroyed by demilitarization, including dismantling various components and destroying the submunitions by controlled detonation. The Minister of Defense issued a decree certifying that the inventories of the Chilean Army no longer hold cluster munitions.[26]

Chile destroyed other stocks of cluster munitions in previous years. According to a Chilean Air Force document dated 23 June 2009, “the air force originally had 48 cluster munitions in stockpile in 2003 of which 42 cluster munitions were consumed for training purposes at sites in the north of Chile in 2007, two more cluster munitions were consumed in 2008, and the remaining four cluster munitions were consumed in 2009.”[27]

Retention

In 2012 and 2013, Chile declared the retention of 12 CBK-250 cluster munitions and 240 inert PM-1 submunitions for research and training purposes.[28] The Monitor does not regard this as the retention of live cluster munitions because the submunitions are inert and no longer functional.



[1] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form A, September 2012. According to the updated report provided in September 2013, there has been no change in national implementation measures since the initial report.

[2] The initial report covers the period from June 2011 to June 2012, while the September 2013 update covers the period from August 2012 to August 2013, providing new information on stockpiling and retention.

[3] For details on Chile’s policy and practice regarding cluster munitions through early 2009, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 56–58.

[4] Statement of Chile, Convention on Cluster Munitions First Review Conference, Dubrovnik, 8 September 2015.

[5] States attending the workshop adopted the “Santiago Declaration,” which calls for “joint action to ensure the protection of civilians through the prohibition and total eradication of cluster munitions.” Santiago Declaration and Elements of an Action Plan, presentation by M. Christian Guillermet, Deputy Permanent Representative, Mission Costa Rica to UNOG, Santiago, 13 December 2013.

[6]Implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” UNGA Resolution 70/54, 7 December 2015.

[10]Situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic,” UNGA Resolution 70/234, 23 December 2015. Chile voted in favor of a similar resolution on 15 May and 18 December 2013, and 18 December 2014.

[11] Katherine Harrison, “Report on the Wellington Conference on Cluster Munitions, 18–22 February 2008,” Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, March 2008, p. 12.

[12] Interview with Luis Doñas, Ministry of National Defense, Santiago, 20 April 2012.

[13] Interview with a representative of the Ministry of National Defense, 22 February 2011.

[14] Statement of Chile, Latin American Regional Conference on Cluster Munitions, San José, 4 September 2007. Notes by the CMC. Chile clarified that two companies used to produce cluster munitions, but no longer did so.

[15] Robert Hewson, ed., Jane’s Air-Launched Weapons, Issue 44 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2004), pp. 306–311.

[17] Monitor notes on a Chilean air force document signed by Chair of the Joint Chief of Staff of the Air Force, “Exports of Cluster Bombs authorized in the years 1991–2001,” dated 23 June 2009, taken during Monitor meeting with Juan Pablo Jara, Desk Officer, Ministry of National Defense, Santiago, 11 April 2012.

[18] Letter from Brig. Gen. Roberto Ziegele Kerber, Director-General of National Mobilization, Ministry of National Defense, 18 May 2012.

[19] Ibid.

[20] Email from the Colombian Campaign to Ban Landmines (Campaña Colombiana Contra Minas, CCCM), 17 March 2009.

[21] Rae McGrath, Cluster Bombs: The Military Effectiveness and Impact on Civilians of Cluster Munitions (London: Landmine Action, August 2000), p. 38. The “Iraq Ordnance Identification Guide” produced by the US military documents the presence of the PM-1 submunition in Iraq. Mine Action Information Center, James Madison University, “Iraq Ordnance Identification Guide,” 31 July 2006.

[22] UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission, “Sixteenth quarterly report on the activities of the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission in accordance with paragraph 12 of Security Council resolution 1284 (1999) S/2004/160,” Annex 1, p. 10.

[23] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Forms B and C, September 2012.

[24] Statement of Chile, Convention on Cluster Munitions Fourth Meeting of States Parties, Lusaka, 11 September 2013.

[26] Statement of Chile, UNGA First Committee on Disarmament and International Security, New York, 30 October 2013.

[27] Monitor notes on a Chilean Air Force document signed by Chair of the Joint Chief of Staff of the Air Force, “Exports of Cluster Bombs authorized in the years 1991–2001,” dated 23 June 2009, taken during Monitor meeting with Juan Pablo Jara, Ministry of National Defense, Santiago, 11 April 2012.

[28] The reports list the locations where the munitions are stored. Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Reports, Form C, September 2012, and September 2013.

Mine Ban Policy

Last updated: 02 November 2011

Policy

Chile signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 December 1997 and ratified it on 10 September 2001, becoming a State Party on 1 March 2002. Chile has not adopted comprehensive national legislation, but it has stated on several occasions that legislation to implement the Mine Ban Treaty is being prepared. In May 2009, Chile stated that its existing laws sufficiently cover the various issues required for implementation, citing the Arms Control Act No. 17.798, which addresses all weapons and explosives, including landmines. Chile nonetheless reiterated its intent to adopt specific legislation for the Mine Ban Treaty. The draft legislation in preparation by various ministries would also serve to implement aspects of the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) Amended Protocol II and Protocol V, as well as the conventions on the rights of persons with disabilities and cluster munitions.[1]

Chile did not submit a Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report for calendar year 2010; its most recent Article 7 report was submitted in 2010 for calendar year 2009.

Chile attended the Tenth Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in Geneva in November–December 2010, as well as the intersessional Standing Committee meetings in June 2011.

Chile is party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons and its Amended Protocol II on landmines and Protocol V on explosive remnants of war. Chile has not submitted an Article 13 report for Amended Protocol II since 2007.

Production, transfer, stockpiling, and retention

Chile is a former producer, exporter, importer, and user of antipersonnel mines. It has reported that it ended production and export in 1985.[2] Chile finished destroying its stockpile of 300,039 antipersonnel mines in August 2003.[3] According to its most recent Article 7 report for calendar year 2009, Chile retains 3,346 mines for training its military in humanitarian disarmament. In 2009, Chile destroyed 725 retained mines during training exercises. [4]

Use

Chile used mines in the 1970s and 1980s along its borders with Argentina, Bolivia, and Peru.

 



[1] Statement of Chile, Standing Committee on the General Status and Operation of the Convention, Mine Ban Treaty, Geneva, 25 May 2009.

[2] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form A, 30 April 2007.

[3] Chile initially reported destruction of a stockpile of 299,219 antipersonnel mines. See Landmine Monitor Report 2004, pp. 300–302. However, Chile’s Article 7 reports submitted since 2005 each cited destruction of 300,039 mines from 4 December 1999 to 25 August 2003. See for example, Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form B, 30 April 2009.

[4] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form D, 30 April 2010.

Mine Action

Last updated: 31 October 2017

Contaminated by: landmines (medium contamination), cluster munitions (medium contamination), and unexploded ordnance (UXO) (limited).

Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 deadline: 1 March 2020
(On track to meet deadline)

Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 4 deadline: 1 June 2021
(Not on track to meet deadline)

Summary

The Republic of Chile has reported almost 97km2 of cluster munition-contaminated area in three of its 15 regions. This area is the total size of the military training ranges where the contamination is located. To date, no survey or clearance has been conducted.

Chile is also affected, to a limited extent, by other UXO, and has some 5.6km2 of mined areas still to release.

Recommendation for action

  • Chile should begin survey and clearance of cluster munition contamination as a matter of urgent priority in order to comply with its obligations under Article 4 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions to clear cluster munition remnants “as soon as possible.”

Mine Contamination

As of the end of 2016, Chile had just more than 5.65km2 of confirmed and suspected mined area across five regions (see table below), believed to contain more than 20,000 landmines.[1] This is a decrease from the 9.17km2 of confirmed and suspected mined area reported for the end of 2015.[2] Most confirmed contamination is in the provinces of Arica and Parinacota. The mines were all laid during the Pinochet regime in the 1970s on Chile’s borders with Argentina in the south, and with Bolivia and Peru in the north. The mined areas, which typically contain both antivehicle and antipersonnel mines, are generally difficult to access and are mostly in unpopulated regions. The vast majority of the mines were laid in the northern region, with some minefields located as high as 5,000m above sea level.[3]

Mined area by province (as of end 2016)[4]

Province

CHAs

Area (m2)

SHAs

Area (m2)

Arica and Parinacota

10

1,632,210

1

145,297

Antofagasta

11

309,805

3

2,985,481

Magallanes and Antártica Chilena

13

507,480

0

0

Tarapacá

6

56,817

0

0

Valparaíso

0

0

1

14,000

Total

40

2,506,312

5

3,144,778

Note: CHAs = confirmed hazardous areas; SHAs = suspected hazardous areas

The impact of remaining contamination is reported to be minimal.[5]

Cluster Munition Contamination

Chile has reported almost 97km2 of cluster munition-contaminated area in three of its 15 regions (see table below). Contamination is a consequence of use of cluster munitions on military training ranges. The areas are also contaminated by other explosive remnants resulting from training exercises. Since the reported extent represents the total size of the areas where cluster munitions were used,[6] the actual extent of contamination may be significantly smaller.

Cluster munition contamination (as of June 2015)[7]

Province

CHAs

Area (km2)

Submunitions expected

Arica and Parinacota

1

33.71

608

Tarapacá

2

56.65

20

Magallanes and Antártica Chilena

1

6.52

20

Total

4

96.88

648

Note: CHAs = confirmed hazardous areas

Chile states that the suspected areas are in closed military areas and the public is not permitted to enter.[8] The impact of cluster munition contamination is believed to be minimal, and there have been no reports of any casualties.

Other Explosive Remnants of War

Chile is also affected, to a limited extent, by other UXO.

Program Management

The national mine action program is managed by the National Demining Commission (Comisión Nacional de Desminado, CNAD), which is chaired by the Minister of Defence.

Chile has not reported on any steps taken to elaborate a workplan to address its four cluster munition-contaminated areas.

Standards

Chile developed a joint demining manual for its armed forces in 2014, which includes procedures for destruction of UXO.[9]

Operators

Demining is conducted by the Army Corps of Engineers and the Navy Peace and Demining Division. Mechanical resources are being used to support manual demining.[10]

Land Release in 2016 (mines)

Chile cleared more than 3.5km2 of mined area in 2016 (see table below), almost doubling output in 2015 of 1.9km2. It has not reported directly on the number of mines cleared in 2016.

Clearance in 2016 (mines)

Clearance in 2016 was conducted over 38 areas in three of the five contaminated regions: Antofagasta, Arica and Parinacota, and Magallanes and Antártica Chilena.[11]

Mine clearance in 2016[12]

Region

Areas subject to clearance

Area cleared (m²)

AP mines destroyed

AV mines destroyed

Antofagasta

14

341,122

N/R

N/R

Arica and Parinacota

11

3,139,874

N/R

N/R

Magallanes and Antártica Chilena

13

42,650

N/R

N/R

Total

38

3,523,646

N/R

N/R

Note: AP = antipersonnel; AV = antivehicle; N/R = not reported.

Land Release (cluster munition remnants)

As of the end of May 2017, Chile had not reported conducting any survey or clearance of its four cluster munition-contaminated areas.

Chile reported in 2017 that a study had been conducted to assess the time and costs required for clearance, but no details were provided. Clearance may be conducted in 2018 if funds from the military budget are available.[13]

Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 Compliance

Under Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty and in accordance with the eight-year extension granted by States Parties in 2011, Chile is required to destroy all antipersonnel mines in mined areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but not later than 1 March 2020.

In July 2016, the Minister of Defence announced that Chile had completed 72% of its mine clearance and that it was on course to complete clearance in 2020.[14] In its statement to the Fifteenth Meeting of States Parties, Chile reiterated its commitment to fulfil its Article 5 obligations, but without indicating whether this would be possible by 2020.[15]

Clearance in 2012–2016 (km2)

Year

Area cleared

Extension request forecast

2016

3.52

1.68

2015

1.89

0.93

2014

2.14

4.22

2013

0.71

1.41

2012

1.34

1.58

Total

9.60

9.82

 

Chile hosted the Fifteenth Meeting of States Parties in Santiago in November–December 2016.

Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 4 Compliance

Under Article 4 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Chile is required to destroy all cluster munitions in areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but not later than 1 June 2021.

 

The Monitor acknowledges the contributions of the Mine Action Review (www.mineactionreview.org), which has conducted some mine action research in 2017, including on survey and clearance, and shared all its resulting landmine and cluster munition reports with the Monitor. The Monitor is responsible for the findings presented online and in its print publications.

 

 



[1] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Reports (for calendar years 2015 and 2016), Form C.

[2] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for 2015), Form C.

[3] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Reports (for calendar year 2009), Form I.

[4] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Reports (for calendar year 2016), Form C.

[5] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Reports (for calendar year 2015), Form C.

[6] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form F, submitted 31 July 2017.

[7] Email from Juan Pablo Rosso, Expert in International Security, International and Human Security Department, Chilean Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 16 June 2015; and see Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form F, September 2012; and Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form F, submitted 31 July 2017.

[8] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form F, submitted 31 July 2017.

[9] Manual No. MDO-90402. Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Reports (for calendar year 2015), Form F2.1.

[10] N. García, “Chile fecha el desminado total de fronteras en 2020” (“Chile will complete the demining of its borders in 2020”), Infodefensa.com, 15 July 2016.

[11] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Reports (for calendar year 2016), Form F2.

[12] Ibid.

[13] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form F, 31 July 2017.

[14] N. García, “Chile fecha el desminado total de fronteras en 2020” (“Chile will complete the demining of its borders in 2020”), Infodefensa.com, 15 July 2016.

[15] Statement of Chile, Mine Ban Treaty Fifteenth Meeting of States Parties, Santiago, 29 November 2016.

Support for Mine Action

Last updated: 12 November 2017

In 2016, the government of the Republic of Chile provided CLP4.1 billion (US$5.8 million) to the National Demining Commission (Comisión Nacional de Desminado, CNAD).[1]

Chile is one of the few states that completely fund their own mine action program. Chile has not received international support since 2007.

Since 2011, the government of Chile has provided more than $25 million toward its mine clearance operations. In its Article 5 deadline extension request submitted in 2011, Chile estimated it would provide approximately $60 million through 2020 in order to complete the clearance of all known mined areas.[2]

Summary of national contributions: 2012–2016[3]

Year

Amount (US$)

% change from previous year

2016

5,776,736

+32

2015

4,382,598

-10

2014

4,877,271

-11

2013

5,494,113

4

2012

5,276,864

1

Total

25,807,582

 

 



[1] Ministry of Defense, Budget Law 2016. Average exchange rate for 2016: US$1=CLP708.144, Oanda.com, Historical Exchange Rates.

[3] See previous Monitor reports.

Casualties

Last updated: 04 October 2017

Casualties Overview

All known casualties by end 2016

At least 149 (29 killed; 120 injured)

Casualties in 2016

4 (2015: 2)

2016 casualties by outcome

1 killed; 3 injured (2015: 2 injured)

2016 casualties by device type

4 antipersonnel mines

 

In 2016, four landmine casualties were reported in the Republic of Chile. In February, a Peruvian national died after stepping on a landmine while crossing the Peru-Chile border illegally.[1] In May, a Dominican national was seriously injured after stepping on a landmine, also near the border with Peru.[2] In September, two Peruvian nationals were seriously injured by an antipersonnel mine in the Quebrada de Escritos sector, also at the border of Peru and Chile.[3]

Two landmine casualties were reported in 2015; a Colombian,[4] and a Peruvian were injured near the border with Peru.[5] No casualties were reported in 2014, however, the totals casualties in 2016 and 2015 were similar to recent years: in 2013, two casualties were reported, while five casualties were identified through media reports in 2012.[6] Prior to 2012, the last casualty reported in Chile was in 2007, when a man was killed by an antipersonnel mine while crossing the border with Peru.[7]

The Monitor has identified 37 casualties (five killed and 32 injured) between 1999 and December 2016. As of March 2016, there were 145 mine/explosive remnants of war (ERW) survivors registered by the National Humanitarian Demining Commission (Comisión Nacional de Desminado Humanitario, CNAD).[8]



[1]Un hombre murió trás pisar una mina cuando cruzaba de forma ilegal a Chile” (“A man died after stepping on a landmine while crossing the border illegally to Chile”), Soy Chile, 8 February 2016.

[2]Dominicano gravemente herido al pisar mina en la frontera Chile-Perú” (“Dominican seriously injured from stepping on a landmine in Chile-Peru border”), 24 Horas Chile, 22 May 2016.

[3]Dos peruanos heridos tras explosión de mina en frontera de Perú y Chile” (“Two Peruvians injured after mine explosion at border of Peru and Chile”), RPP Noticias, 5 September 2016.

[4]Ciudadano colombiano resultó herido por una mina antipersonal en la frontera de Chile y Perú” (“Colombian citizen wounded by antipersonal mine on the border of Chile and Peru”), La Tercera, 25 January 2015.

[5] Email from Elir Rojas Calderón, Adviser to the Minister of Defence, 2 June 2015; and “Ciudadano peruano sufre la amputación de su pie por mina antipersonal en Chile” (“Peruvian citizen has his foot amputated following an antipersonnel mine explosion”), 24Horas, 1 June 2015.

[6] See previous editions of the Monitor.

[7] See the Peru country report in Landmine Monitor Report 2007.

[8] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Elir Rojas Calderón, Ministry of Defence, 27 March 2016. 

Casualties and Victim Assistance

Last updated: 06 October 2016

Action points based on findings

  • Improve coordination between survivors’ associations and institutions providing services to persons with disabilities.
  • Improve inclusion of survivors in design, provision, and monitoring of assistance services.
  • Adopt legislation based on the needs expressed by victims and allocate resources to its implementation.

Victim assistance commitments

The Republic of Chile is responsible for survivors of landmines and explosive remnants of war (ERW). Chile has made a commitment to provide victim assistance through the Mine Ban Treaty, Protocol V of the Convention on Conventional Weapons, and the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

Chile ratified the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on 29 July 2008.

Casualties Overview

All known casualties by end 2015

At least 145 (28 killed; 116 injured)

Casualties in 2015

2 (2014: 0)

2015 casualties by outcome

2 injured

2015 casualties by device type

2 antipersonnel mines

 

In 2015, two landmine casualties were reported in Chile. Both casualties were civilians, an adult Colombian man injured by an antipersonnel mine while crossing the border with Peru,[1] and a Peruvian national who lost his right foot after stepping on an antipersonnel mine in the Gallinazo area near the border with Peru.[2] The number of casualties in 2015 was an increase compared to 2014, when no casualties were reported. However, the total of two casualties in 2015 was similar to recent years. In 2013, two casualties were reported, while a total of five casualties were identified through media reports in 2012.[3] Prior to 2012, the last casualty reported in Chile was in 2007 when a man was killed by an antipersonnel mine while crossing the border with Peru.[4]

In 2016, casualties continued to occur. In February, a Peruvian national died after stepping on a landmine while crossing the Peru-Chile border illegally.[5] In May, a Dominican national was seriously injured after stepping on a landmine, again near the border with Peru.[6]

The Monitor has identified 39 casualties (five killed and 34 injured) between 1999 and December 2015.

Victim Assistance

As of March 2016, there were 145 mine/ERW survivors registered by the National Humanitarian Demining Commission (Comisión Nacional de Desminado Humanitario, CNAD).[7]

Assessing needs

In 2015, CNAD visited victims throughout the country to collect data on survivors and their families, including familiars of the deceased.[8]

Victim assistance coordination

CNAD is the government focal point for victim assistance. In 2014, it underwent an evaluation by the General Comptroller’s Office and was not fully operational to coordinate victim assistance.[9] By the end of 2015, the Office of the Prosecutor was investigating allegations of fraud related to armed forces members of CNAD.[10]

Legislation regulating victim assistance that was to improve planning remained pending government approval as of August 2016, seven years after its initial drafting. In June 2016, the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) and the Chilean Campaign to Ban Landmines co-hosted a preparatory meeting for the 15th Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty—to be held in Chile near the end of the year—that brought together eight mine/ERW survivors from different parts of the country, other members of civil society, and representatives of the Chilean National Demining Commission, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the Ministry of Defense. At the meeting, survivors called on the government to ensure the imminent passage of the law, and certainly before the Meeting of States Parties.[11]

Other meetings were held with the victims’ representative organizations to inform them on the progress of the draft victim law in 2015 and 2016.[12] As of end of 2015, CNAD had a cooperation agreement on the health-related needs of military survivors with the National Defense Security Fund (Caja de Previsión de la Defensa Nacional, CAPREDENA)[13] and an agreement with the health commission of the Chilean Army (Comando de Salud del Ejército, COSALE) on providing assistance to military landmine survivors.[14]

CNAD primarily addressed the needs of military victims. Most civilians with disabilities, including civilian landmine survivors, are eligible for free healthcare through the National Health Fund and for other social support managed by the Ministry of Planning. However, the national NGO, Group of Mines and Munitions Victims (GMMV), reported that a number of civilian victims had not received appropriate services.[15] A cooperation agreement signed in 2011 between the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Health provides guidelines for the coordination of medical assistance to mine/ERW survivors beneficiaries of the National Health Fund that applied to both contributing and non-contributing fund members.[16]

Chile and Argentina agreed to a memorandum of cooperation for medical assistance for deminers in the case of accidents in the southern part of the country.[17] The agreement enables access to medical facilities and transportation in both countries. The agreement was reaffirmed by both parties in 2015 when the Tierra del Fuego border was declared mine free.[18]

Chile submitted a general overview of victim assistance in its Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report for calendar year 2015. In November 2015 during the 14th Meeting of the State Parties in Geneva, Chile confirmed its intention to promote the creation of an advisory group that would provide recommendations and guidelines to states on victim assistance in order to foster international cooperation within the convention.[19] Chile did not provide updates on victim assistance at the Mine Ban Treaty Third Review Conference in Maputo in June 2014 or the Convention on Cluster Munitions First Review Conference in Dubrovnik in September 2015.

In 2016, Chile will assume the Presidency of the Mine Ban Treaty and will host the 15th Meeting of States Parties in November. It has planned to assign special importance to survivors’ rights in the contexts of disability rights and national plans.[20] In March 2016, Chile convened a pledging conference for Mine Ban Treaty States Parties in Geneva, which was also open for commitments by states to provide resources for implementation of victim assistance.[21]

The National Disability Service (Servicio Nacional de Discapacidad, SENADIS) oversees coordination of national disability policy under the auspices of the Inter-ministerial Committee on Social Development. SENADIS also receives support from the Consultative Council on Disability, which includes representatives of persons with disabilities’ organizations.[22] There is no formal mechanism for SENADIS to be involved in providing assistance to landmine survivors, but in 2014 it contributed to a report on the draft victim law together with other government institutions. Since 2013, Chile has had a national policy for the inclusion of persons with disabilities.[23]

Assessing victim assistance needs

CNAD is responsible for maintaining and updating the registry of mine/ERW victims that was developed between 2009 and 2012.[24] In developing the registry, CNAD conducted a needs assessment of identified victims, visiting their homes and working with local governments to register the victims with the social insurance system.[25] In 2015, CNAD updated the registry and took measures to coordinate medical assistance to victims.[26]

A draft victim law presented to the national congress in September 2013 provides for the creation of a national registry of victims. If adopted, the victim registry would be under the responsibility of the Ministry of National Defense.[27]

In 2015, the Ministry of Health started to apply a regulation approved in 2014 guaranteeing that a multidisciplinary evaluation for the process of certification of disability status.[28] At the beginning of 2016, the Ministry of Social Development and SENADIS presented the results of the second National Disability Study that included the conditions of persons with disabilities and their carers, as well as the implementation of the CRPD and the law on Equality of Opportunities and Social Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities (Law 20.422).[29] In October 2015, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child shared its concerns regarding the lack of information on children with disabilities and their needs at the national level.[30]

Inclusion and participation in victim assistance

The Group of Mine and Munitions Victims (GMMV), a national survivors’ network, actively advocates for fulfillment of the rights and needs of mine/ERW survivors and the families of casualties.[31] The GMMV is also involved in the monitoring of victim assistance activities. However, there is no formal relation between CNAD and civil society organizations.[32] The NGO Centro Zona Minada (Mined Zone Center), which has survivor members, was also active in victim assistance.[33]

Throughout 2014 and in the beginning of 2015, a number of mine/ERW survivors and family members participated in discussions held in the Senate on the draft victim law under review. They requested before the Senate’s Defense Commission that the life pension and scholarships be included in the law.[34] However, further into 2015 mine/ERW survivors and their representative organizations were not included in the planning of victim assistance activities.[35] In 2015, survivors reported that they were not consulted or included in thework on disability issues and did not contribute to Mine Ban Treaty or Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 reporting, nor did they participate in the delegation attending the Mine Ban Treaty or Convention on Cluster Munitions Review Conferences in 2014 and 2015 respectively.[36] However, efforts were being made to include more survivor representatives in the activities of the CNAD and the Defense Ministry.[37]

CNAD’s Consultative Council was created in 2005 with the objective of promoting the participation of civil society in the instance’s discussions, however it never met. The lack of coordination was detrimental to victim participation and representation.[38]

In its concluding observation on Chile’s initial report to the CRPD, the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disability recommended the implementation of a binding mechanism to consult and include the requests of persons with disabilities into legislation and policy design.[39]

Service accessibility and effectiveness

No major changes regarding access to services were reported in 2015. Mine/ERW survivors have access to emergency assistance, other than by a request made through the public health system, there was no specific victim assistance program to provide medical and psychological support.[40] Survivors reported that the majority did not receive assistance, whereas the CNAD reported that all registered survivors were provided with medical assistance.[41] Military and civilian mine/ERW survivors do not have equal access to the same state services. Military survivors benefit from retirement pensions and medical and physical rehabilitation services, however, civilian survivors were not eligible.[42] There were no available services with special considerations for the age or gender of mine/ERW survivors.[43]

Chile adopted the Equality of Opportunities and Social Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities Act in 2010, following the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). SENADIS, which operated regional offices throughout the country, is responsible for implementation of the act. SENADIS has been the updating disability statistics and the 2010–2020 National Action Plan on Disability since 2010.[44]

Chilean law prohibits discrimination against persons with physical, sensory, intellectual, and mental disabilities and the government effectively enforced the law. However, in 2014, persons with disabilities still experienced discrimination, especially in accessing post-secondary education and employment.[45] In 2015, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights urged Chile to strengthen its anti-discrimination law.[46] The law provides for universal and equal access to buildings, information, and communications and allows the state to take affirmative action to foster non-discrimination and accessibility of cultural services, physical environment and transportation, education, training and employment, and communication.[47] The public transportation system, particularly outside Santiago, did not adequately provide accessibility for persons with disabilities. In recent years however, TranSantiago, the main system of public transportation within Santiago, instituted changes to improve compliance with the law.[48] In April 2016, the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disability expressed concerns over the slow progress made by Chile in terms of physical accessibility and the lack of a complaint mechanism to report violations of the rights of persons with disabilities.[49]

Rehabilitation

SENADIS’s community rehabilitation center support program has been in operation since 2007. The program provides family consultation, home visits, community information sessions, and support to community-based organizations in the design of workplans. The national system consists of community and comprehensive rehabilitation centers, as well as community hospitals that have adopted the community-based rehabilitation strategy.[50]

However, capacity was not sufficient to cover the needs of all persons with disabilities, including mine/ERW survivors.[51] Many survivors were living in very difficult conditions, and some had not had their prosthesis replaced for more than 15 years, a situation that caused them additional health problems. Many survivors also had to pay for their prosthesis in the first place.[52] According to the Committee on the Rights of the Child, rehabilitation services for children with disabilities are also insufficient.[53] In addition, in its concluding observation on Chile’s initial report to the CRPD, the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities highlighted that resources are allocated to private rehabilitation service providers despite the fact that these bodies do not guarantee universal access.[54]

Social and economic inclusion

There is no specific provision for mine/ERW survivors in the legal framework on persons with disabilities. No social, economic, or education program directly promotes their inclusion.[55]

Each year, SENADIS, through its National Fund for Inclusive Projects (Fondo Nacional de Proyectos Inclusivos), supports initiatives throughout the country in the following areas: accessibility, culture, sport, education, employment, justice, legal reform or adaptation, participation, rights promotion, and assistive technologies. In 2015, SENADIS funded 108 projects across the country (a slight increase compared to 106 in 2014). There were no SENADIS projects designed specifically for mine/ERW survivors.[56] The National Training and Employment Service (Servicio Nacional de Capacitación y Empleo, SENCE) Social Programmes Department offered training to a large number of persons with disabilities among vulnerable groups. Factors that continued to obstruct access to employment for persons with disabilities included: social and business prejudices and a general reluctance by some companies, weak professional qualifications and low levels of education, and the continued presence of architectural barriers that prevent access to the workplace.[57]

A SENADIS program, promotes the inclusion of persons with disabilities in the workforce.[58] Each year, the program distinguishes institutions with initiatives for the inclusion of persons with disabilities. In 2015, several directions of the Ministry of Public Work were qualified as inclusive, among other public and private bodies.[59] However, access to inclusive education and vocational training for children with disabilities remains limited.[60] In its most recent response to the Committee of Persons with Disabilities, Chile affirmed that a draft law aiming at ensuring the rights of children is currently being reviewed at the Chamber of Deputies and that it includes a provision on non-discrimination of children with disabilities.[61]

In March 2016, the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities also expressed its concern over the low employment rates of persons with disabilities as well as regarding the need for better coverage of basic services, especially for those living in remote areas and those living with severe disability.[62] During the same month, the government of Chile stated that it was working on a draft law aimed at establishing a labor market inclusion system for persons with disabilities in public and private bodies.[63]

Laws and policies

In September 2013, the President of Chile introduced the draft victims’ law to the national congress. The draft law was designed to provide reparations and assistance in physical and psychological rehabilitation as well as social inclusion to mine/ERW survivors as a means to comply with Chile’s international commitments under the Mine Ban Treaty, the Convention on Cluster Munitions, and Protocol V of the Convention on Conventional Weapons.[64] Representatives of various government ministries and civil society, including a representative of the GMMV, were involved in developing the draft law.[65] In 2014, survivors also provided testimony to the Human Rights Committee of the National Congress as part of the congressional review of the draft law. In 2015, the National Human Rights Institute released a report analyzing the draft law. Among its recommendations were the inclusion of psychological support, socioeconomic reintegration measures, and life pension in order to make reparation more comprehensive.[66]

In 2015, after repeated requests from civil society, a life-long pension was included in the draft law,[67] which was approved by the Senate in May 2016.[68] The draft law defines a victim as someone who has been injure by a mine/ERW explosion or the family members of someone killed by such an explosion. Family members of survivors are not included in the definition as victims and are therefore not eligible as beneficiaries. Benefits drafted under the law include one-time financial payments as reparations, free and preferential access to medical care and rehabilitation through the National Health Fund, as well as free prosthesis and orthosis[69] and, since 2016, life pension for survivors.[70]

Article 5 of the law refers to assistance for social inclusion, but without specific provisions. Article 10 establishes that the Norms on Equality of Opportunity and Social Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities would also apply to mine/ERW survivors.[71] An additional request was made for survivors without permanent disabilities to be covered by the law.[72]

In 2015, the draft law continued to pass through the review process of the National Congress.[73] In October 2015, the Ministry of Defense decided to prioritize victim assistance among other issues, which should allow for more developments regarding the law.[74] The Senate presented a draft agreement to the presidency in March 2016 in an attempt to gain approval of the victim’s law prior to the 15th Meeting of the States Parties to be held in Chile in November 2016.[75] 

In April 2016, the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities expressed concern regarding the absence of a plan to harmonize national legislation related to the rights of persons with disabilities.[76] In the years following the adoption of the Equality Opportunities and Social Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities Act in 2010, Chile approved a National Policy for the Social Inclusion of People with Disabilities for the period 2013–2020. The policy was elaborated both by SENADIS and the Inter-ministerial Committee of Social Development on Disability Issues. The policy is supported by an action plan that concretely engages all sectors of society (Plan de Acción de la Política Nacional para la Inclusión Social de las Personas con Discapacidad, PLANDISC).[77]



[1]Ciudadano colombiano resultó herido por una mina antipersonal en la frontera de Chile y Perú” (Colombian citizen wounded by antipersonal mine on the border of Chile and Peru), La Tercera, 25 January 2015.

[2] Email from Elir Rojas Calderón, Adviser to the Minister of Defence, 2 June 2015; and “Ciudadano peruano sufre la amputación de su pie por mina antipersonal en Chile” (“Peruvian citizen has his foot amputated following an antipersonnel mine explosion”), 24Horas, 1 June 2015.

[3] See previous editions of the Monitor.

[4] See the Peru country report in Landmine Monitor Report 2007.

[5]Un hombre murió trás pisar una mina cuando cruzaba de forma ilegal a Chile” (“A man died after stepping on a landmine while crossing the border illegally to Chile”), Soy Chile, 8 February 2016.

[6]Dominicano gravemente herido al pisar mina en la frontera Chile-Perú” (“Dominican seriously injured from stepping on a landmine in Chile-Peru border”), 24Horas, 22 May 2016.

[7] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Elir Rojas Calderón, Adviser to the Minister of Defence, 27 March 2016.

[8] Email from Elir Rojas, Advisor to the Minister of Defense, 11 June 2016.

[9] Email from Sergio Aranibar Araya, Coordinator, Groups of Mine and Munitions Victims (GMMV), 10 June 2015.

[10]Defensa: Fiscalía investiga fraude al fisco en Comisión Nacional de Desminado por más de $ 300 millones” (“Defense: Prosecutor investigates fraud in National Demining Commission for more than 300 million”), The Clinic online, 15 December 2015.

[12] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Elir Rojas Calderón, Adviser to the Minister of Defence, 27 March 2016.

[13] Response to Monitor questionnaire, María Christina Rayo Quintana, National Demining Commission, 8 June 2015; and Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2015), Form J.

[14] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2015), Form J.

[15] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Serbio Aranibar, GMMV, 11 February 2016.

[16] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2015), Form J.

[17] Statement of Chile on Victim Assistance, Mine Ban Treaty Thirteenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 December 2013.

[18]Argentine y Chile declararon zona libre de minas antipersonales a la frontera de Tierra del Fuego” (“Argentina and Chile declared Tierra del Fuego border mine free”), El Diario del Fin del Mundo, 3 March 2015.

[19] Statement of Chile, High Level Victim Assistance Session, Mine Ban Treaty 14th Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 30 November to 4 December 2015.

[20] Ibid.; and Antipersonnel Mine Ban Convention website, “15 MSP,” undated.

[21] “First International Pledging Conference for the Implementation of the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention,” Invitation by the Presidency of the Fifteenth Meeting of the States Parties, received via email to ICBL network, on 3 February 2016.

[22] “Comité sobre Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidades, Examen de los informes presentados por los Estados en virtud del artículo 35 de la Convención, Chile” (“Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Review of the reports presented by the States under article 35 of the Convention, Chile”), 10 September 2014, p. 49.

[23] SENADIS, “Política Nacional para la Inclusión Social de las Personas con Discapacidad 2013-2020 (parte 1)” (“National Policy for the Social Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities 2013-2020, part 1”), November 2013.

[24] Statement of Chile, Thirteenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 3 December 2013; and Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2013), Form J; and response to Monitor questionnaire by María Christina Rayo Quintana, National Demining Commission, 8 June 2015.

[25] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2012), Form I.

[26] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Elir Rojas Calderón, Advisor to the Minister of Defence, 27 March 2016.

[27] Convention on Cluster Munition Article 7 Report (for August 2012 to August 2013), Form H. 

[28] Cuenta Pública 2015, Ministerio de Salud de Chile (Public accountability 2015, Ministry of Health of Chile), Part 7, Mental health and disability, p. 457.

[29]Información sobre el II Estudio Nacional de la Discapacidad” (“Information on the II National Disability Study”), SENADIS website, 21 January 2016.

[30] “Concluding observations on the combined fourth and fifth periodic reports of Chile,” Convention on the Rights of the Child, October 2015, p. 12.

[31] Email from Elir Rojas Calderón, Centro Zona Minada, 22 February 2012.

[32] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Elir Rojas Calderón, Advisor to the Minister of Defence, 27 March 2016.

[33] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sergio Aranibar, GMMV, 11 February 2016.

[34]Familiares y víctimas de artefactos explosivos militares piden que se aumenten beneficios considerados en proyecto de ley” (“Families and ERW victims request increase of benefits included in the draft law”), Senate of the Republic of Chile, 17 April 2015.

[35] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sergio Aranibar, GMMV, 11 February 2016.

[36] Ibid.

[37] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Elir Rojas Calderón, Adviser to the Minister of Defence, 27 March 2016.

[38]Informe sobre proyecto de ley que proporciona reparación y asistencia en rehabilitación a las víctimas de explosión de minas u otros artefactos explosivos militares abandonados sin estallar - Boletín N° 9109-02” (“Report on draft law providing reparation and rehabilitation assistance to victims of explosion of abandoned or unexploded military mine/ERW – Bulletin N° 9109-02”), Instituto Nacional de Derechos Humanos (National Human Rights Institute, INDH), 15 June 2015, p. 3; and “Minas antipersonales: Víctimas acusan falta de atención del gobierno” (“Antipersonel mines: victims report lack of governmental assistance”), Diario UChile, 14 February 2016.

[39] “Observaciones finales sobre el informe inicial de Chile” (“Concluding Observation on Chile’s initial report”), Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disability, 18 April 2016, p. 2.

[40] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Elir Rojas Calderón, Adviser to the Minister of Defence, 27 March 2016.

[41]Minas antipersonales: Víctimas acusan falta de atención del gobierno” (“Antipersonnel mines: victims report lack of governmental assistance”), Diario UChile, 14 February 2016; and email from Pamela Velasquez, Chilean Campaign to Ban Landmines, 19 March 2016.

[42] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sergio Aranibar, GMMV, 11 February 2016.

[43] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Elir Rojas Calderón, Adviser to the Minister of Defence, 27 March 2016.

[44]Comité sobre Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidades, Examen de los informes presentados por los Estados en virtud del artículo 35 de la Convención, Chile” (“Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Review of the reports presented by the States under article 35 of the Convention, Chile”), 10 September 2014, pp. 7–8.

[45] United States Department of State, “2015 Country Report on Human Practices in Chile,” 13 April 2016.

[46] Human Rights Watch, “Human Rights Watch World Report 2016,” Country Chapter – Chile 2015.

[47]Comité sobre Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidades, Examen de los informes presentados por los Estados en virtud del artículo 35 de la Convención, Chile” (“Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Review of the reports presented by the States under article 35 of the Convention, Chile”), 10 September 2014, pp.11 and 14.

[48] United States Department of State, “2015 Country Report on Human Practices in Chile,” 13 April 2016.

[49] “Observaciones finales sobre el informe inicial de Chile” (“Concluding Observation on Chile’s initial report”), Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disability, 18 April 2016, p. 3.

[50]Comité sobre Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidades, Examen de los informes presentados por los Estados en virtud del artículo 35 de la Convención, Chile” (“Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Review of the reports presented by the States under article 35 of the Convention, Chile”), 10 September 2014, p. 49.

[51] Ibid., pp. 25–26.

[52] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sergio Aranibar, GMMV, 11 February 2016; and email 10 June 2015.

[53] “Concluding observations on the combined fourth and fifth periodic reports of Chile,” Convention on the Rights of the Child, October 2015, p. 12.

[54] “Observaciones finales sobre el informe inicial de Chile” (“Concluding Observation on Chile’s initial report”), Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disability,18 April 2016, p. 8.

[55] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sergio Aranibar, GMMV, 11 February 2016.

[56] SENADIS, “Resultados del Fondo Nacional de Proyectos Inclusivos 2015” (“Results of the National Fund for Inclusive Projects 2015”), 28 May 2015.

[57]Comité sobre Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidades, Examen de los informes presentados por los Estados en virtud del artículo 35 de la Convención, Chile” (“Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Review of the reports presented by the States under article 35 of the Convention, Chile”), 10 September 2014, p. 40.

[58] United States Department of State, “2013 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Chile,” Washington, DC, 27 February 2014.

[59]Ministro Barraza y Director Nacional de SENADIS entregan Sello Chile Inclusivo 2015 a instituciones públicas y empresas privadas” (“Minister Barraza and Director of SENADIS award Sello Chile Inclusivo 2015 to public institutions and private enterprises”), SENADIS website, 27 January 2016.

[60] “Concluding observations on the combined fourth and fifth periodic reports of Chile,” Convention on the Rights of the Child, October 2015, p. 12.

[61] “Comentarios del Gobierno de Chile al documento borrador Observaciones finales del Comité sobre Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad” (“Comments of the Government of Chile on concluding observations of the Committee on the Rights of Person with Disabilities”), April 2016, p. 3.

[62] “Observaciones finales sobre el informe inicial de Chile” (“Concluding Observation on Chile’s initial report”), Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disability, 18 April 2016, p. 8.

[63] “Comentarios del Gobierno de Chile al documento borrador Observaciones finales del Comité sobre Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad” (“Comments of the Government of Chile on concluding observations of the Committee on the Rights of Person with Disabilities”), April 2016, p. 7.

[64] “Mensaje de S.E. el Presidente de la Republica con el que inicia un proyecto de ley que proporciona reparación y asistencia en rehabilitation a las victimas de explosión de minas u otros artefactos explosivos militares abandonados o sin estallar” (“Message of H.E. President of the Republic with which starts a law project to provide reparations and assistance in rehabilitation to the victims of mines and other abandoned or unexploded military explosive artefacts”), Message 082-361, Santiago, 30 August 2013. “Oficio de Ley a Cámara Revisora” (“Report to the Review Committee”), 13 January 2015.

[65] Statement of Chile, Mine Ban Treaty Thirteenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 December 2013; and email from Elir Rojas Calderón, Centro Zona Minada, 10 May 2012.

[66]Informe sobre proyecto de ley que proporciona reparación y asistencia en rehabilitación a las víctimas de explosión de minas u otros artefactos explosivos militares abandonados sin estallar - Boletín N° 9109-02” (“Report on draft law providing reparation and rehabilitation assistance to victims of explosion of abandoned or unexploded military mine/ERW – Bulletin N° 9109-02”), Instituto Nacional de Derechos Humanos (National Human Rights Institute, INDH), 15 June 2015, pp. 12 and 15.

[67] Email from Pamela Velasquez, Chilean Campaign to Ban Landmines, 19 March 2016.

[68] Message from the Senate to the President, Valparaíso, 3 May 2016.

[69]Proyectos de Ley” (“Law Projects”), Oficio de Ley a Cámara Revisora (Report to the Review Committee), 13 January 2015.

[70] Email from Pamela Velasquez, Chilean Campaign to Ban Landmines, 19 March 2016.

[71]Proyectos de Ley” (“Law Projects”), Oficio de Ley a Cámara Revisora (Report to the Review Committee), 13 January 2015.

[72] Email from Elir Rojas, Advisor to the Minister of Defense, 30 January 2016.

[73]Proyectos de Ley” (“Law Projects”), Chilean National Congress, 13 January 2015; and email from Elir Rojas Calderón, Advisor to the Minister of Defense, 29 May 2015.

[74] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Elir Rojas Calderón, Advisor to the Minister of Defense, 27 March 2016.

[75] Draft demining agreement submitted by the Senate of Chile, March 2016.

[76] “Observaciones finales sobre el informe inicial de Chile” (“Concluding Observation on Chile’s initial report”), Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disability, 18 April 2016, p. 2.

[77] SENADIS, “Política Nacional para la Inclusión Social de las Personas con Discapacidad 2013-2020 (parte 1)” (“National Policy for the Social Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities 2013-2020, part 1”), November 2013.