Ukraine

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

Last updated: 25 June 2019

Summary: Non-signatory Ukraine has not taken any steps to accede to the convention. It has participated as an observer in meetings of the convention, but not since 2014. Ukraine abstained from voting on a key United Nations (UN) resolution on the convention in December 2018.

Ukraine possesses a large stockpile inherited from the Soviet Union. In 2014–2015, the armed forces of the government of Ukraine used cluster munition rockets in Donetsk and Luhansk provinces in eastern Ukraine, as did Russian-backed armed opposition groups. The government of Ukraine has repeatedly denied that it used cluster munitions in the attacks.

Policy

Ukraine has not acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

Ukraine has acknowledged the deadly long-term consequences of cluster munitions, but has not taken any steps to accede to the convention. [1] In 2012, Ukraine told the Monitor that it “considers cluster munitions to be legal weapons” and “an important component of Ukraine’s defense capabilities.” [2] Yet the government denied using cluster munition rockets in the country’s eastern provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk in 2014 until a February 2015 ceasefire (see Use section below). There is no evidence of cluster munition use since February 2015.

Ukraine has stated that, if using its own resources alone, it would not be able to destroy the large stockpile of cluster munitions that it inherited from the Soviet Union within the eight-year deadline required by the Convention on Cluster Munitions [3] (see Stockpiling and destruction section below).

Ukraine attended several meetings of the Oslo Process that created the Convention on Cluster Munitions and participated as an observer in the formal negotiations in Dublin in May 2008. [4]

Ukraine has participated as an observer in Meetings of States Parties of the convention, but not since 2014. [5] It was invited to, but did not attend the convention’s Eighth Meeting of States Parties in Geneva in September 2018.

In December 2018, Ukraine abstained from the vote on a UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolution that calls on states outside the Convention on Cluster Munitions to “join as soon as possible.” [6] It has abstained from voting on the annual UNGA resolution promoting the convention since it was first introduced in 2015.

Ukraine has voted in favor of UNGA and Human Rights Council resolutions expressing outrage at the use of cluster munitions in Syria, most recently in December 2018 and March 2019, respectively. [7]

Ukraine is a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty. It is also a party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW).

Production and transfer

In November 2010, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs official said that Ukraine has not produced cluster munitions and did not import them. [8]

Stockpiling and destruction

Ukraine inherited a large stockpile of cluster munitions after the break-up of the Soviet Union. It shared information in 2011 on the types stockpiled, as detailed in the following table.

Cluster munitions of the armed forces of Ukraine [9]

 

Cluster munition type

Surface-to-surface rocket

220mm Uragan9M27K

300mm Smerch 9M55K

Tochka-U (SS-21)

Aircraft dispenser

KMGU containing BFK-AO2.5, BFK-ODC, BFK-PTAB, BFK-AP cartridges of submunitions

Air-dropped bomb

RBK-500-375

RBK-500-AO

RBK-500-255

RBK-500-SP-B7

RBK-500-ZAB

RBK-250-275

RBK-250-ZAB

At that time, Ukraine said that cluster munitions constituted 35% of its stocks of conventional weapons, which totaled two million tons of ammunition. Of these cluster munitions, 34% were produced before 1980, while another 36% were produced between 1981 and 1992 and “might be used.” The remaining 30% contained antivehicle landmines. [10]

Ukraine has reported the destruction of an average of 10,000–20,000 tons of cluster munitions annually and estimated that it could take 60 years to destroy the stockpiles that are currently slated for destruction. [11]

Use

Ukraine has used cluster munitions as recently as 2015, but has denied responsibility for doing so. Despite continued hostilities, there has been no evidence or allegations of new use of cluster munitions in the east of the country since a February 2015 ceasefire.

Previously, in 2010, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs official said that Ukraine would not use cluster munitions except to defend itself from outside aggression. [12] In the past, Ukraine has called for a moratorium on the use of what it has described as “inaccurate and unreliable” cluster munitions. [13]

Use in 2014–2015

Human Rights Watch, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) monitoring mission, and media outlets have reported use of cluster munitions by Ukrainian government forces and Russian-backed anti-government forces in the east of the country from July 2014 until February 2015. [14]

Both parties used two types of ground-fired cluster munitions:

  • The 300mm 9M55K-series Smerch (“Tornado”) cluster munition rocket, which has a minimum range of 20 kilometers and a maximum range of 70 kilometers, and delivers 72 9N235 submunitions.
  • The 220mm 9M27K-series Uragan (“Hurricane”) cluster munition rocket, which has a range of 10–35 kilometers and delivers 30 9N235 submunitions or 30 9N210 submunitions.

The Smerch and Uragan cluster munition rockets are fired from dedicated multi-barrel launchers mounted on an eight-wheeled vehicle. The 9N210 and 9N235 fragmentation submunitions are designed to self-destruct a minute or two after being ejected from the rocket. [15] Yet a significant number of submunitions used failed to self-destruct as designed and several cluster munition rockets malfunctioned shortly after launch, falling to the ground with their full payload of submunitions intact.

The 2014–2015 cluster munition attacks in Ukraine attracted widespread media coverage, public outcry, and condemnations from at least 32 states and the European Union. [16]

Neither party to the conflict accepted responsibility for using cluster munitions. Ukraine has repeatedly denied the use and attributed the attacks to pro-Russian separatist groups and members of the Russian armed forces. [17] Russia has repeatedly drawn attention to Ukraine’s use of cluster munitions, but has not itself acknowledged or taken responsibility for the cluster munition attacks. [18] The denials and lack of a strident defense of the weapons show how the growing norm stigmatizing cluster munitions is taking hold.

There is no evidence indicating that cluster munitions have been used elsewhere in Ukraine, for example, in Crimea.



 [1] Statement of Ukraine, Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) on Cluster Munitions, 8 April 2008. Notes by Landmine Action.

 [2] Letter No. 4132/36-196-771 from Amb. Yuriy A. Sergeyev, Permanent Mission of Ukraine to the UN in Geneva, 23 April 2012; and Letter No. 181/017 from the Permanent Mission of Ukraine to the UN in Geneva, 29 April 2010.

 [3] In 2010, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs official said that Ukraine’s “negative experience” with the destruction of its antipersonnel mine stockpiles under the Mine Ban Treaty was influencing how it views the Convention on Cluster Munitions. Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC) meeting with Ruslan Nimchynskyi, Deputy Director-General, Directorate General for Armaments Control and Military Technical Cooperation, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in Vientiane, 11 November 2010. Notes by the CMC.

 [4] For details on Ukraine’s cluster munition policy and practice up to early 2009, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 249–250.

 [5] Ukraine participated as an observer in the convention’s Meetings of States Parties in 2010, 2011, and 2014.

 [6]Implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” UNGA Resolution 73/54, 5 December 2018.

 [7]Situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic,” UNGA Resolution 73/182, 17 December 2018. Ukraine voted in favor of similar UNGA resolutions in 2013–2017; and “The human rights situation in the Syrian Arab Republic,” Human Rights Council Resolution 40/17, 22 March 2019.

 [8] CMC meeting with Ruslan Nimchynskyi, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in Vientiane, 11 November 2010. Notes by the CMC.

 [9] “Impact of the CCW Draft Protocol VI (current version) on Ukraine’s Defense Capability,” Geneva, 1 April 2011, slides 3–4. Presentation of Ukraine to a CCW group of government experts on cluster munitions.

 [10] Ibid., slide 2.

 [11] Ibid.

 [12] CMC meeting with Ruslan Nimchynskyi, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in Vientiane, 11 November 2010. Notes by the CMC.

 [13] Letter No. 181/017 from the Permanent Mission of Ukraine to the UN in Geneva, 29 April 2010. It first called for such a moratorium in April 2008; and statement of Ukraine, CCW GGE on Cluster Munitions, 8 April 2008. Notes by Landmine Action.

 [14] See, Human Rights Watch, “Technical Briefing Note: Cluster Munition Use in Ukraine,” June 2015.

 [15] Because types of submunitions are identical in size, shape, and color, the only way to distinguish them is by their external markings and by measuring the size of the pre-formed fragments they contain.

 [16] The following states condemned the use of cluster munitions in Ukraine: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Burundi, Chad, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Ecuador, France, Guatemala, Ireland, Italy, Jordan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mauritania, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Portugal, Russia, Rwanda, Slovenia, Somalia, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. At the First Review Conference in September 2015, States Parties adopted the Dubrovnik Declaration, which affirms: “We are deeply concerned by any and all allegations, reports or documented evidence of the use of cluster munitions, including in…Ukraine. We condemn any use of cluster munitions by any actor.” “The Dubrovnik declaration 2015: Spectemur agendo (judged by our actions),” annexed to the Final Report of the Convention on Cluster Munitions First Review Conference, CCM/CONF/2015/7, 13 October 2015.

 [17] Minister of Foreign Affairs Pavlo Klimkin acknowledged the “serious accusations…deserve the deepest investigation.” Letter from Pavlo Klimkin, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, to the editor of The New York Times, 30 October 2014. See also, statement of Ukraine, OSCE Forum for Security Co-operation, Vienna, 29 October 2014; and statement of Ukraine, CCW Protocol IV Meeting, Geneva, 12 November 2014. Notes by the CMC. At the UNGA First Committee on Disarmament and International Security in October 2015, Ukraine continued to allege that “Russia-guided illegal armed groups” and members of the Russian armed forces carried out Uragan and Smerch rocket attacks in eastern Ukraine. Statement of Ukraine, UNGA First Committee, New York, 13 October 2015.

 [18] See, statement of Russia, OSCE Forum for Security Co-operation, Vienna, 10 December 2014.