Congo, Democratic Republic of
Cluster Munition Ban Policy
Ten-Year Review: The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) signed the convention in 2009 and its parliament approved ratification in 2013, but the ratification process still has not been completed. The DRC attended the Ninth Meeting of States Parties in Geneva in September 2019, its first participation in a meeting of the convention since 2015. It voted in favor of a key United Nations (UN) resolution promoting the convention in December 2019.
In 2011, the DRC reported that it has never used, produced, or transferred cluster munitions, and does not possess a stockpile. Cluster munitions were used in the DRC in the past, but the party or parties responsible has never been conclusively identified.
Policy
The DRC signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 18 March 2009.
The current status of the DRC’s ratification efforts is not known. The Senate adopted the ratification legislation on 28 November 2013.[1] In 2015, the DRC stated that the ratification legislation was awaiting review by the Constitutional Court.[2]
The DRC stated in 2014 that its implementation legislation for the Mine Ban Treaty had been amended to incorporate provisions of the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[3] However, the Monitor has never been able to obtain a copy of the law to confirm this.
The DRC provided three voluntary Article 7 transparency reports for the Convention on Cluster Munitions in 2011–2014, but none since then.[4]
The DRC actively participated in the Oslo Process that created the Convention on Cluster Munitions and strongly supported a comprehensive ban as well as the inclusion of provisions on international cooperation and assistance. Due to inadequate signing authority, the DRC could not sign the convention in Oslo in December 2008, but it signed three months later at the UN in New York.[5]
The DRC has participated in meetings of the convention, most recently the Ninth Meeting of States Parties in Geneva in September 2019.[6] This was its first participation in a meeting of the convention since 2015.
In December 2019, the DRC voted in favor of a key UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolution that urges states outside the Convention on Cluster Munitions to “join as soon as possible.”[7] It has voted in favor of the annual UNGA resolution promoting the convention since it was first introduced in 2015.[8]
The DRC has abstained from Human Rights Council resolutions condemning use of cluster munitions in Syria, most recently in June 2020.[9]
The DRC has elaborated its views on several important issues relating to the interpretation and implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions. In 2012, the government’s national mine action coordinator said that the DRC agreed with the views of the Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC) that the provisions of the convention forbid transit in, foreign stockpiling of, and investment in the production of cluster munitions, and also forbid assistance with the use of cluster munitions in joint military operations with states not party.[10]
The DRC is a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty. It is not party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons.
Use, production, transfer, and stockpiling
The DRC reports that it has never produced cluster munitions and does not possess a stockpile.[11]
However, the DRC may have received a shipment of Chilean-manufactured cluster munitions from Zimbabwe in or after July 2013.[12] As a signatory, under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the DRC has committed not to take any action that runs contrary to the object and purpose of the convention such as importing or otherwise receiving cluster munitions.
The DRC states that it never used cluster munitions, but “foreign armies” used cluster munitions in the DRC in the past.[13] The DRC’s cluster munition contamination includes BL-755, BLU-63, BLU-55, ShAOB-0.5, and PM1-type submunitions.[14]
In May 2013, the DRC reported that an abandoned stockpile of 1,593 ShAOB-0.5 submunitions was found and destroyed in Goma in 2011.[15]
[1] See, Convention on Cluster Munitions voluntary Article 7 Report, Form A, June 2014; and statement by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, Coordinator, Congolese National Center for the Fight Against Mines (Centre Congolais de Lutte Antimines, CCLAM), Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 7 April 2014.
[2] Statement by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, CCLAM, Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 22 June 2015.
[3] Ibid., 7 April 2014. This was not declared in the voluntary Article 7 transparency report it submitted in June 2014. See, Convention on Cluster Munitions voluntary Article 7 Report, Form A, June 2014.
[4] The initial Convention on Cluster Munitions voluntary Article 7 report submitted on 15 May 2011 covers the period from February 2002 to 15 May 2011, while the report provided on 10 April 2012 covers calendar year 2011, and the report provided in June 2014 covers calendar years 2012 and 2013.
[5] For details on the DRC’s cluster munition policy and practice through early 2009, see Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 60–61.
[6] It did not attend meetings of the convention in 2016–2018. The DRC participated in the convention’s Meetings of States Parties in 2010–2014, the First Review Conference in 2015, and intersessional meetings in 2011–2015, as well as regional workshops on cluster munitions, most recently the Kampala Convention on Cluster Munitions ratification seminar on 29–30 May 2017.
[7] “Implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” UNGA Resolution 74/62, 12 December 2019.
[8] The DRC voted in favor of the Convention on Cluster Munitions resolution in 2015, 2016 and 2018, but was absent from the vote on UNGA Resolution 72/54 in December 2017.
[9] See, “Situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic,” Human Rights Council Resolution 43/28, 22 June 2020.
[10] Meeting with Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Focal Point of the Struggle Against Mines (Point Focal National pour la Lutte Antimines, PFNLAM), in Brussels, 15 April 2012.
[11] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Capt. Roger Bokwango, Deputy Coordinator, PFNLAM, 30 March 2010; and statement by Nzuzi Manzembi, Director, Directorate of International Organizations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 6 March 2009. Notes by the Congolese Campaign to Ban Landmines (CCIM).
[12] In May 2018, HRW reviewed a copy of an official document including “packing list” addressed to the National Army of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, dated 3 July 2013 and issued on the letterhead of Zimbabwe Defense Industries Ltd. The document lists various weapons including three crates or pallets of cluster bombs, one weighing 350kg and two weighing 150kg each. According to the document, a manual for CB-250K cluster bombs was also provided. It is unclear if complete cluster bombs were provided or components. Chile produced and transferred CB-250K cluster bombs prior signing the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions.
[13] Statement by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, CCLAM, Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 7 April 2014. See also, statement of the DRC, Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 28 June 2011.
[14] In May 2013, the DRC reported for the first time that BLU-55 type submunitions had been found and destroyed in Katanga and South Kivu provinces. It also reported for the first time that ShAOB-type submunitions were destroyed during clearance operations in Lubumbashi in 2012. It reported that in 2012, 55 submunitions of the type PM1 were destroyed in Bolomba, Équateur province, and a further nine PM1 submunitions destroyed in Lubutu, Maniema province in 2013. The official stated that BL-755 and BLU-55 submunitions had been destroyed in Manono and Kabalo, Katanga province, and in Shabunda, South Kivu province. Statement of the DRC, Lomé Regional Seminar on the Universalization of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Lomé, Togo, 23 May 2013. Notes by Action on Armed Violence (AOAV). See also, statement of the DRC, Convention on Cluster Munitions First Meeting of States Parties, Vientiane, Lao PDR, 11 November 2010. Notes by the CMC; and statement of the DRC, Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 28 June 2011.
[15] Convention on Cluster Munitions voluntary Article 7 Report, Form F, 10 April 2012; statement by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, PFNLAM, Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 18 April 2012. The DRC stated that the submunitions were left in the eastern part of the country by foreign troops invited onto its territory in recent armed conflicts. The stockpile consisted of three bombs containing 531 submunitions each. The armed forces gave the submunitions to mine action NGO Mines Advisory Group (MAG) to destroy.
Impact
Jump to a specific section of the profile:
Treaty Status | Management & Coordination | Impact (contamination & casualties) | Addressing the Impact (land release, risk education, victim assistance)
Country summary
The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is contaminated by antipersonnel landmines and explosive remnants of war (ERW), as a consequence of armed conflict involving neighboring states, militias, and non-state armed groups (NSAGs) since the late 1990s.[1] In 2011, the DRC reported that contamination from mines and ERW existed across the country, although ERW contamination was a more extensive problem than mine contamination. Cluster munition remnants contamination has also been discovered, but these areas have not yet been surveyed. In 2018, the resurgence of armed conflict resulted in new ERW contamination, particularly in eastern and central regions.
In 2011, the DRC requested a 26-month extension to its Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 deadline in order to understand the extent of remaining contamination, and further requested a six-year extension in 2014, with a deadline of 1 January 2021. However, the DRC did not meet this deadline and submitted a third extension request in September 2020 for an additional 18 months. This was approved at the Mine Ban Treaty Eighteenth Meeting of States Parties, which was held virtually in November 2020.
Risk education in the DRC is carried out by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and community volunteers, who conduct risk education sessions, mark hazardous areas, and convey alerts to the national authorities. High-risk groups are children, women, internally displaced persons (IDPs), and refugees.
The DRC is responsible for a significant number of mine/ERW victims, and reported more than 1,700 survivors as of the end of 2019.[2] Despite existing measures benefiting mine/ERW survivors, such as free access to medical care and prostheses, and tax exemption for companies which employ a mine survivor, most survivors are not aware of these rights due to the lack of victim assistance coordination in the country.[3] Several victim assistance actors report that funding for such activities was scarce, and that there was no improvement in 2019 compared to previous years.[4]
Treaty status overview[5]
Mine Ban Treaty |
State Party Article 5 clearance deadline: 1 July 2022 (third request) |
Convention on Cluster Munitions |
Signatory |
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) |
State Party |
Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 deadline
The DRC’s initial Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 clearance deadline was 1 November 2012, but a 26-month extension was requested to conduct national survey to better understand the extent of the remaining contamination, enabling the DRC to submit a follow-up extension request in 2014.[6]
The DRC did not meet its extended Article 5 deadline, resulting from the second extension request, of January 2021. The DRC submitted a third extension request in September 2020, which was approved, setting a new deadline of 1 July 2022.[7] The DRC reports it is on track to meet this deadline, provided that sufficient funding is available and security and health conditions improve.[8] This projection is based on a budget of some US$3 million and a collaboration between three mine clearance operators, supported by the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (FARDC).[9] In February 2020, DanChurchAid (DCA) took responsibility for clearance of three quarters of the remaining contaminated areas.[10]
Mine action management and coordination
Mine action management and coordination overview[11]
National mine action management actors |
Congolese Mine Action Center (CCLAM) |
UN agencies |
United Nations Mine Action Service (UNMAS) |
Other actors |
Humanity & Inclusion (HI) supports capacity-building within CCLAM |
Mine action legislation |
Law 11/007 of 9 July 2011 governs the national mine action program |
Mine action strategic and operational plans |
New strategy was being developed as of August 2020 |
Mine action standards |
24 National Mine Action Standards; regularly updated in accordance with International Mine Action Standards (IMAS). |
The Congolese Mine Action Center (CCLAM) was established in 2012, with support from the United Nations Mine Action Coordination Center (UNMACC) and the United Nations Mine Action Service (UNMAS). CCLAM took over responsibility from UNMAS for the coordination of mine action in the DRC in 2016, although UNMAS continues to provide guidance and support.
Strategies and policies
The DRC’s National Mine Action Strategy for 2018–2019, developed with support from the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD), UNMAS, and the Government of Japan, has expired. The DRC reported in August 2020 that it was in the process of developing a new national mine action strategy.[12]
There is a gender unit within CCLAM’s advocacy department. It aims to ensure the mobilization and inclusion of women in mine action, to ensure the participation of women and men in the implementation of all five pillars of mine action, and to promote the inclusion of women in both administrative and operational activities.[13]
Mine action is integrated into the DRC’s National Development Plan, through the security governance component.[14]
Information management
CCLAM assumed responsibility from UNMAS for information management in January 2016. The alerts received from mine action operators and local communities are recorded by CCLAM in the Information Management System for Mine Action (IMSMA) database.[15]
Risk education management and coordination
Risk education management and coordination overview[16]
Government focal points |
CCLAM |
Coordination mechanisms |
The National Risk Education Program provides accreditations, delivers task orders, and conducts quality control |
Risk education standards |
Included in the National Mine Action Standards |
National Standards and guidelines
The National Risk Education Strategy was included in the expired National Mine Action Strategy for 2018–2019.[17] Led by the head of the risk education department within CCLAM, the program meets on a quarterly basis.
Victim assistance management and coordination
Victim assistance management and coordination overview[18]
Government focal points |
Ministry of Social Affairs Ministry of Humanitarian Action, and National Solidarity |
Coordination mechanisms |
Mine/ERW Victim Assistance Coordination Group; re-established in January 2018 under CCLAM |
Coordination regularity and outcomes |
Three coordination meetings took place in 2019, leading to the identification of mine/ERW victims and better reporting of information by NGOs |
Plans/strategies |
None currently in place* |
Disability sector integration
|
Creation in August 2019 of a Ministry for Persons with Disabilities and Other Vulnerable Persons The Physical Rehabilitation Sub-Group, facilitated by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) with the participation of the National Community-Based Readaptation Program of the Ministry of Public Health, remained active in 2019 |
Survivor inclusion and participation |
Survivor organizations participated in mine action and disability coordination meetings |
Note: NGO=non-governmental organization.
* The National Mine Action Strategy for 2018–2019 included a reference to victim assistance in its first strategic objective. The strategy has now expired.
Laws and policies
The constitution prohibits discrimination against persons with disabilities and provides specific protection, however the government did not enforce these provisions effectively and persons with disabilities often found it difficult to obtain employment, education, or government services. A new Ministry of Social Affairs in charge of people living with disabilities and other vulnerable persons was created in August 2019. Legislation does not mandate access to buildings or government services for persons with disabilities, and persons with disabilities continued to suffer social stigmatization.[19]
The DRC acceded to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) in September 2015. However, the DRC has not adopted national laws to implement the provisions of the CRPD. A proposal for new legislation to protect persons with disabilities in the DRC and promote their rights was drafted in 2012, with the involvement of NGOs, but has not yet been adopted.[20]
In June 2016, the Ministry of Social Affairs adopted a National Strategic Plan for the Promotion and Protection of Persons with Disabilities.[21]
Contamination
Contamination overview (as of August 2020)[22]
Landmines |
1.28km² (CHA: 0.93km² and SHA: 0.35km²) Extent of contamination: Small |
Cluster munition remnants |
Unknown |
Other ERW contamination |
0.06km² Extent of contamination: Small |
Note: CHA=confirmed hazardous area; ERW=explosive remnants of war; and SHA=auspected hazardous area.
Landmine contamination
The DRC is contaminated by antipersonnel mines and ERW as a result of armed conflict involving neighboring states, militias, and NSAGs, which has worsened since the late 1990s.[23]
Mine contamination limits circulation of populations and access to water, food, shelter and health services. IDPs and returnees are particularly vulnerable to the threat posed by mines/ERW.[24]
Remaining contamination in the DRC is low, but primarily affects the Ituri and North-Kivu provinces, which are difficult to access due to the presence of NSAGs and the Ebola epidemic.[25] The DRC also reported that some contaminated areas in North-Ubangi, Tanganyika, and Tshuapa provinces were difficult to access, and therefore will require more time and resources to clear.[26]
As of the end of 2019, CCLAM reported remaining mine contamination totaled 0.33km2 across 47 areas.[27] However, in its Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 deadline extension request of August 2020, the DRC reported 33 mined areas remaining, totaling 1.28km².[28]
In addition, the Aru territory in Ituri province, and the Dungu territory in the Haut-Uele province, still remain to be surveyed.[29] These two territories were not surveyed as part of the national survey in 2013 due to security concerns.[30]
Improvised mine contamination was identified in North-Kivu. Surveys could not be conducted due to ongoing security concerns in the region, and the extent of the contamination there is unknown.
Various types of improvised mines have been discovered in the DRC, and identification of these types was ongoing as of the end of 2019. Some of the devices discovered have been described as ‘‘pressure-release’’ mines, and survivors’ testimonies indicate that some of the devices were activated by the contact or weight of a person.[31]
Cluster munition remnants contamination
The expired National Mine Action Strategy for 2018–2019 stated that in addition to landmines and ERW, “some areas contaminated by submunitions have also been reported but the areas affected remain negligible.”[32]
In August 2020, the DRC reported that several areas were found to contain cluster munition remnants, but these areas had not been surveyed and their size had not yet been determined. Cluster munition remnants contamination has been identified in at least five provinces: Ituri, Maniema, Tanganyika, Tshuapa, and South-Kivu.[33]
ERW Contamination
The DRC is affected by other ERW as a result of years of conflict involving neighboring states, militias, and rebel groups. Successive conflicts have also left the country with significant quantities of abandoned explosive ordnance (AXO).[34]
In 2019, explosive ordnance continued to pose a significant risk to civilians in the DRC, increased by the resurgence of armed conflict that has resulted in new ERW contamination in eastern and central regions. The DRC reports that there are 44 confirmed hazardous areas (CHA) contaminated with ERW, covering 0.06km² in total. ERW contamination has also been reported at firing ranges in Kitona, Kisangani, and Mbandaka.[35]
Casualties
Casualties overview[36]
Casualties |
|
All known casualties (through 2019) |
2,925 (including 1,099 killed; 1,789 injured; and 37 survival outcome unknown) |
Casualties in 2019 |
|
Annual total |
42 (increase from 31 in 2018) |
Survival outcome |
17 killed, 25 injured |
Device type causing casualties |
41 ERW, 1 antipersonnel mine |
Civilian status |
All civilians |
Age and gender* |
22 adults (6 women, 16 men) 18 children (3 girls, 14 boys, 1 unknown) |
*The age and gender of two casualties in 2019 was not reported.
Note: ERW=explosive remnants of war.
Casualties in 2019: details
In 2019, 42 civilian casualties were identified in the DRC. As in previous years, children constituted a significant portion of all casualties, with nearly half of casualties being minors. The 2019 casualty total represented an increase from the 31 mine/ERW casualties recorded for 2019.[37]
All casualties in 2019 were civilians; and all incidents resulting in casualties involved ERW, except one incident that was reported to have been caused by an antipersonnel landmine.
Casualty data for the DRC significantly under-represents the true number of people killed and injured, due to the absence of a national data collection system for mine/ERW casualties and the fact that parts of the country remain inaccessible due to lack of infrastructure and security constraints.[38] In 2020, CCLAM reported that identifying mine/ERW victims remained challenging in the DRC.[39]
Cluster munition casualties
Unexploded cluster munition remnants have caused 207 casualties in the DRC, for all time.[40] The last unexploded submunition casualties identified in disaggregated data occurred in 2010.
Mine action
Operators and service providers
Clearance operators
National |
Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (FARDC) Congolese National Police (PNC) Africa for Mine Action (AFRILAM) |
International |
DanChurchAid (DCA), since 2004 The Development Initiative (TDI), contracted by the United Nations Mine Action Service (UNMAS) |
Clearance
Land release overview[41]
Landmine land release in 2019 |
Cleared: 0.21km2 Cancelled: 0.28km2 |
Ordnance destroyed in 2019 |
21 antipersonnel mines; 7 antivehicle mines; 5 improvised mines; 94, cluster munition remnants; 3,808 ERW |
Landmine clearance in 2015–2019 |
2015: 0.49km² 2016: 0.38km² 2017: 0.45km² 2018: 0.28km² 2019: 0.21km2 Total land cleared: 1.81km2 |
Progress |
|
Landmines |
The DRC was granted an extension request for a period of 18 months until July 2022 to clear its remaining mined areas
|
Note: ERW=explosive remnants of war.
Land release: landmines
There is still a need to conduct survey in order to determine the total extent of contamination in the DRC, particularly in areas affected by recent conflict.[42] In November 2019, the DRC and Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA) launched a reassessment of confirmed hazardous areas (CHA) and suspected hazardous areas (SHA) in 12 regions.[43]
The DRC reported that 0.21km2 was cleared in 2019, while non-technical survey (NTS) conducted in Ituri, North-Ubangi, South-Ubangi, and Tshopo provinces led to the release of 0.28km2.[44]
Land release: cluster munition remnants
During clearance operations in 2019, 94 unexploded submunitions were cleared and destroyed. The DRC has reported a need to strengthen the capacities of its coordination and operational personnel with regards the clearance of cluster munition remnants.[45]
The national survey had identified two areas contaminated with cluster munition remnants in the provinces of Ituri and Tanganyika, covering 0.02km². These areas were subsequently cleared and a total of 2,688 cluster munition remnants were cleared and destroyed.[46]
Deminer safety
In 2019–2020, there were several violent incidents involving deminers, including the kidnapping of a member of AFRILAM and the murder of a TDI team leader in North-Kivu province.[47]
Residual contamination
Over 400 deminers from FARDC and PNC have been trained since 2011, and a recycling program was being developed in order to deal with any residual risk once the DRC’s Mine Ban Treaty clearance obligations have been met.[48]
Risk education
Operators and service providers
Risk education operators[49]
Type of organization |
Name of organization |
Type of activity |
National* |
Action for the Integral Development of Communities through Community Conservations (ADIC) |
Risk education in schools, returnee communities and host communities in South-Kivu; dissemination of flyers, booklets and posters; radio broadcasts; setting-up of community mine action committees; marking of hazardous areas |
Synergy for Mine Action (Synergie pour la lutte antimines, SYLAM) |
Risk education for IDPs, returnees and host communities in North-Kivu; marking of hazardous areas; training of community volunteers |
|
Association for the Protection of the Environment (APPEI) |
Risk education in North-Ubangi, South-Ubangi and Mongala; training of community volunteers; marking of hazardous areas |
|
Africa for Mine Action (AFRILAM) |
Risk education in Ituri since June 2019, particularly in the Djugu territory for IDPs and host communities; awareness-raising through community radio; provision of leaflets and brochures |
|
Office of Development Actions and Emergencies (Bureau d’actions de développement et des urgences, BADU) |
Risk education in North-Kivu; setting-up community mine action committees; marking of hazardous areas |
|
African Demining, Development and Environment Group (GADDE) |
Risk education in Tanganyika; training of community volunteers |
|
Movement for Integral Development (MDI) |
Risk education in Kasaï-Central |
|
International |
UN Mine Action Service (UNMAS) |
Risk education sessions in Tanganyika, South-Kivu and Ituri |
* Other national organizations providing risk education in the DRC, not listed in the table, include: the DRC Red Cross, ADAID, SYOPADI, ACCOLAM, COODEPE, ADES, and ADEPSU.
Note: IDP=internally displaced persons.
The network of NGOs and community volunteers listed in the above table, ensure the sustainability of risk education efforts in the DRC, mark hazardous areas, and convey alerts to national authorities.[50]
Implementation: target groups
The main target groups for risk education in the DRC are communities in conflict areas, young people, women, people living in regions worst affected by mines/ERW, refugees, IDPs and returnees, staff members of international NGOs, medical personnel, and members of peacekeeping missions.[51]
In the DRC, children are among the most vulnerable to the threat of mines/ERW due to their curiosity and lack of awareness of danger. Women are also vulnerable as their daily activities often include traveling, and searching for goods and materials needed for survival of the household. IDPs and refugees are also at risk because they are often unaware of mine/ERW contamination in the areas where they have taken refuge.[52]
Major developments in 2019
In addition to education sessions, risk education is provided through text messages, social media, radio, and television.[53] There was no assessment of the DRC’s risk education program in 2019.[54]
Victim assistance
Providers and activities
Victim assistance providers and activities overview[55]
Type of organization |
Name of organization |
Type of activity |
Governmental |
National Community-Based Rehabilitation Program (PNRBC) |
Ministry of Health’s coordinating body for community rehabilitation; physical rehabilitation; capacity-building in communities; provision of wheelchairs |
National |
National Committee of Organizations for Persons with Disabilities and on Mine Victim Assistance (Collectif National des Organisations des Personnes Handicapées et d’Assistance aux Victimes de Mines, CNOPHAVM) |
Advocacy |
Actions for Integral Development through Community Conservation (ADIC) |
Ad hoc registration of victims; referrals of victims for rehabilitation; income-generating activities; access to education |
|
Office of Development Actions and Emergencies (Bureau d’actions de développement et des urgences, BADU) |
Ad hoc registration of victims; referrals of victims for rehabilitation |
|
National association of mine survivors and victims (Association nationale des survivants de mines et de défense des intérêts des victimes, ANASDIV) |
Socio-economic inclusion; advocacy; inclusive education |
|
Congolese Campaign to Ban Landmines and Cluster Munitions (CCBL) |
Advocacy |
|
Synergy for mine action (Synergie pour la lutte antimines, SYLAM) |
Income-generating activities in eastern North-Kivu |
|
DRC Red Cross |
Provision of prostheses to the Kinshasa Provincial General Referral Hospital |
|
Shirika La Umoja Center for Persons with Physical Disabilities, Goma |
Physical rehabilitation; education; social inclusion; advocacy |
|
International |
Polus Centre for Social and Economic Development (PCSED) |
Rehabilitation services in North-Kivu; training of prosthetic technicians; vocational training in the coffee industry and other industries; capacity-building of local NGO partners |
Humanity & Inclusion (HI) |
Capacity-building of rehabilitation actors; community-based rehabilitation; emergency physical rehabilitation; advocacy on participation of persons with disabilities; psychosocial support |
|
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) |
Physical rehabilitation in Bukavu, Goma and Kinshasa; support to hospitals and emergency medical care in Goma; first-aid training; referrals for financial and psychosocial support; scholarships; building the DRC’s first reference center for physiotherapy and orthopedic services |
|
United Nations Mine Action Service (UNMAS) |
Provision of orthopedic equipment and raw materials to the Shirika La Umoja Center for Persons with Physical Disabilities in Goma; provision of kits for income-generating activities |
|
DanChurchAid (DCA) |
Psychosocial support |
Major Developments in 2019
The security situation in the DRC remained volatile in 2019. Ethnic violence persisted, and continued to result in casualties, displacement, the destruction of livelihoods and property, and other abuses against civilians.[56]
The DRC reported a significant decrease in funding for victim assistance in 2019, and the activities of several organizations providing such assistance stopped. There has been little funding for victim assistance since 2012.[57] AFRILAM reported that new mine/ERW survivors in eastern DRC did not receive any assistance in 2019.[58]
Some mine/ERW survivors in North-Kivu received support through the UN’s Central Emergency Response Fund (UNCERF) in 2019.[59]
In 2019, a draft national bill, designed to implement the provisions of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), was submitted to the National Assembly for adoption.[60]
Needs assessment
The identification of mine/ERW survivors in the DRC remained challenging due to a lack of financial and logistical means to reach survivors, and the unavailability of victim assistance services.[61]
Medical care and rehabilitation
Access to quality healthcare remained limited in the DRC.[62] The costs of medical care and prostheses for mine survivors are covered by the state,[63] yet there was no reliable referral system for victim assistance.[64] A reference center for physiotherapy and orthopedic services was being built in 2019 with ICRC support, and will be the first center of its kind in the DRC when it opens.[65]
Socio-economic and psychosocial inclusion
Providing psychological support remained a significant challenge, as has been the case for several years. Psychological support and socio-economic inclusion services were only available in one province in 2019.[66] CNOPHAVM’s peer support activities were at a standstill.[67]
The DRC reported a lack of funding for the socio-economic inclusion of survivors.[68] The Polus Center for Social and Economic Development, together with partners and US funding, created a private-public partnership, the Lake Kivu Coffee Alliance, which provided vocational training within the coffee industry for mine/ERW survivors, in addition to physical rehabilitation and prosthetics. The initiative also supports a local mine survivors’ association. In 2020, a coffee tasting lab and training center was under construction in partnership with the University of Buffalo.[69]
The Ministry of Education increased its special education outreach efforts but estimated fewer than 6,000 children with disabilities were being reached.[70] ANASDIV ran remedial teaching schools in eastern DRC for children of mine victims, but funding was insufficient.[71]
There is a tax exemption in the DRC for any company which employs a mine survivor.[72]
Cross-cutting
Few provisions exist to reach mine/ERW survivors living in rural and remote areas,[73] while there was no specific assistance for child survivors.[74]
[1] An escalation of conflict between rebel group M23 and the armed forces of the DRC, with support of the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the DRC (MONUSCO), from August to November 2013, also resulted in new contamination of large areas of land, including roads and access routes, with unexploded ordnance (UXO). See, United Nations Mine Action Service (UNMAS), “2015 Protfolio of Mine Action Projects, Democratic Republic of the Congo,” undated.
[2] In addition to the 1,786 survivors reported by the DRC, the Monitor identified another three survivors of mine/ERW incidents in 2019.
[3] Statement of the DRC, Mine Ban Treaty Fourth Review Conference, Oslo, 28 November 2019.
[4] Email from Tabin Lissendja, Coordinator, Afrique pour la Lutte Antimines (AFRILAM), 20 July 2020; email from Valentin Tshitenge, Programme National de Réadaptation à Base Communautaire (PNRBC), 4 August 2020; and response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[5] DRC’s initial Article 5 Mine Ban Treaty clearance deadline was 1 November 2012. Its current deadline of 1 July 2022 was requested in an extension request submitted by the DRC in September 2020. See, DRC Mine Ban Treaty Third Article 5 deadline Extension Request, 24 September 2020.
[6] Email from Jean-Denis Larsen, Country Director, Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA), 5 March 2018; email from Guillaume Zerr, HI, 24 May 2018; and statements of the DRC, Mine Ban Treaty intersessional meetings, Standing Committee on Mine Action, Geneva, 21 June 2011 and 27 May 2013.
[7] Statement of the DRC, Mine Ban Treaty intersessional meetings (virtual), 2 July 2020; and DRC Mine Ban Treaty Third Article 5 deadline Extension Request, 24 September 2020.
[8] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[9] The three operators are DanChurchAid (DCA), Africa for Mine Action (AFRILAM), and The Development Initiative (TDI); see, statement of the DRC, Mine Ban Treaty intersessional meetings (virtual), 2 July 2020.
[10] Statement of the DRC, Mine Ban Treaty intersessional meetings (virtual), 2 July 2020.
[11] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020; and statement of the DRC, Mine Ban Treaty Fourth Review Conference, Oslo, 27 November 2019.
[12] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[13] Ibid.
[14] Ibid.
[15] United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA), “Overview of Humanitarian Needs: Democratic Republic of Congo,” December 2019, p. 65.
[16] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[17] Ibid.
[18] Information on victim assistance coordination obtained from the DRC Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2018), Form H; response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020; DRC National Strategic Mine Action Plan 2018–2019, November 2017 pp. 18–22; “In DRC, the budget of the new ministry of disability is too small,” RFI, 3 December 2019; response to Monitor questionnaire by Marc Liandier, ICRC, 21 June 2019; response by Christiane Matabaro, National Coordinator, ANASDIV, 5 July 2019; ICRC, “Annual Report 2019,” 29 June 2020, p. 153; and DRC Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2018), Form H.
[19] US Department of State, “2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Democratic Republic of the Congo,” 11 March 2020.
[20] Karolina Kozik and Jean-Sébastien Sépulchre, “A bill on the rights of persons with disabilities raises hopes in DR Congo,” Human Rights Watch (HRW), 11 March 2020; and DRC National Strategic Mine Action Plan 2018–2019, November 2017 p. 14.
[21] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Franck Mbizi Mwana Mu Mwana, Department for the Coordination of Rehabilitation Activities for Persons with Disabilities (DICOREPHA), Ministry of Social Affairs, 24 May 2017; by Francky Miantuala, CCBL, 31 May 2017; and by Ngubo Selemani Longange, CCLAM, 2 June 2017; and report of the Consultations on the Situation of Persons With Disabilities in the DRC, Kinshasa, 2–4 June 2016.
[22] DRC Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 third deadline Extension Request, August 2020, p. 40
[23] An escalation of conflict between rebel group M23 and the armed forces of the DRC with support of MONUSCO, from August–November 2013, resulted in new contamination of large areas of land, including roads and access routes, with UXO. UNMAS, “2015 Protfolio of Mine Action Projects, Democratic Republic of the Congo,” undated.
[24] UNOCHA, “Overview of humanitarian needs: Democratic Republic of Congo,” December 2019, p. 64.
[25] Statement of the DRC, Mine Ban Treaty intersessional meetings (virtual), 2 July 2020.
[26] Ibid.
[27] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[28] Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 deadline Extension Request, August 2020, pp. 10 and 40; and presentation of the DRC, Mine Ban Treaty Eighteenth Meeting of State Parties (virtual), 16 November 2020.
[29] DRC Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 deadline Extension Request, August 2020, p. 40.
[30] See ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: DRC: Mine Action,” 29 November 2015.
[31] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[32] DRC National Strategic Mine Action Plan 2018–2019, November 2017, p. 8.
[33] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[34] UNMAS, “Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Support to UN Country Team and the Government,” updated in January 2015, online reference no longer available.
[35] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[36] In addition to the total of 2,922 mine/ERW casualties, including 1,786 injured reported by the CCLAM in August 2020, the Monitor found three additional casualties (all injured). Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020; and Monitor media monitoring 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019. In 2017, UNMAS reported 2,573 mine/ERW casualties and noted that the UNMAS database is only able to disaggregate data from 2014 until 2017; prior to 2014 the data was not disaggregated and some data was lost. See ICBL-CMC, “Monitor Country Profile: DRC: Casualties,” 16 June 2017.
[37] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[38] Ministry of Social Affairs, “Plan Stratégique National d’Assistance aux Victimes des Mines/REG et autres Personnes en Situation de Handicap: Novembre 2010–Octobre 2011” (“National Strategic Plan for Assistance for mine/ERW Victims and other Persons with Disabilities: November 2010–October 2011,” PSNAVH), 24 February 2011, p. 20; email from King Venance Ngoma Kilema, UNMAS, 22 July 2015; statement of the DRC, Mine Ban Treaty Intersessional Standing Committee Meetings, Geneva, 19 May 2016; response to Monitor questionnaire by Baudouin Asubeti Milongo, Victim Assistance Focal Point, CCLAM, 11 July 2016; and email from King Venance Ngoma Kilema, UNMAS, 2 May 2017.
[39] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[40] Monitor analysis of casualty data provided by Aurélie Fabry, UNMAS, 15 April 2014; and analysis of casualty data provided by King Venance Ngoma Kilema, UNMAS, 22 July 2015 and 27 May 2016. In the limited casualty dataset for the DRC provided by UNMAS in 2017, only 157 submunition casualties were recorded. Monitor analysis of casualty data provided by King Venance Ngoma Kilema, UNMAS, 2 May 2017.
[41] For land clearance data, see the DRC Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2017), form D, p. 10. These figures are different from those reported in the Monitor for 2015–2017, which are: 2015: 314,562m²; 2016: 211,293m²; and 2017: 226,025m². See also, the DRC Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2018), p. 6. A figure of 422,461m² is also given for the period from 1 January 2018 to March 2019. CCLAM reported that since 1 January 2015, 2.2km2 of mined areas have been cleared and 250 antipersonnel mines destroyed. Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[42] UNOCHA, “Overview of Humanitarian Needs: Democratic Republic of Congo,” December 2019, p. 65.
[43] Statement of the DRC, Mine Ban Treaty Fourth Review Conference, Oslo, 27 November 2019.
[44] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[45] Ibid.
[46] Ibid.
[47] Ibid.
[48] Ibid.
[49] Information on risk education operators obtained from: ADIC, “Final narrative report of the mine risk education project, non-technical surveys and assistance to victims of mines, explosive remnants of war as well as people living with disabilities in the Kimbi-Lulenge health area in the Fizi territory,” 15 May 2020, p. 3; Jonathan Kombi, “Beni: towards the clearance of the Kamango health area, near the ADF’s base,” Actualite.cd, 8 January 2020; response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020; UNMAS, “Portfolio of mine action projects: Democratic Republic of the Congo,” undated, pp. 7–8; DRC Protection Cluster, “Djugu: analysis and advocacy note on the state of protection of civilians,” December 2019, p. 7; UN in the DRC, “Korea Cooperation Agency delegation visits mine action project,” 9 September 2019; and UNMAS, “Portfolio of mine action projects: Democratic Republic of the Congo,” undated, p. 5; and UNMAS, “Consolidation of peace and stability in the Democratic Republic of the Congo through the mitigation of the explosive threat and capacity building of the mine action sector,” 27 April 2020.
[50] UNOCHA, “Overview of Humanitarian Needs: Democratic Republic of Congo,” December 2019, p. 65.
[51] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[52] Ibid.
[53] Ibid.
[54] Ibid.
[55] Provided funding is available, other organizations are also active in the field of victim assistance: AFRILAM, Church of Christ in Congo–Ministry of the Church for Refugees and Emergencies (ECC-MERU), Solidarity Women for Peace and Development (FSPD), and GADDE. Information on activities of victim assistance operators listed in the table obtained from: response to Monitor questionnaire by Christiane Matabaro, National Coordinator, ANASDIV, 5 July 2019; response to Monitor questionnaire by Bobya Ngongo Mbeya Williams, CCBL, 27 June 2019; Jonathan Kombi, “Beni: towards the clearance of the Kamango health area, near the ADF’s base,” Actualite.cd, 8 January 2020; US Department of State, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement (PM/WRA), “To Walk the Earth in Safety,” 2 April 2020, p. 12; and Polus Center, “The Democratic Republic of the Congo,” undated; HI, “Fiche Pays RDC,” 2019; ICRC, “Annual Report 2019,” 29 June 2020, pp. 153–154; UN in the DRC, “Assistance to more than 80 victims of mines and explosive remnants of war: UNMAS,” 26 March 2019; and DCA, “Where We Work: Democratic Republic of Congo,” undated.
[56] ICRC, “Annual Report 2019,” 29 June 2020, p. 151.
[57] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020; and email from Tabin Lissendja, Coordinator, AFRILAM, 20 July 2020.
[58] Email from Tabin Lissendja, Coordinator, AFRILAM, 20 July 2020.
[59] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[60] Ibid.
[61] Ibid.
[62] Stanis Bujakera Tshiamala, “In DRC, a health system running on empty,” Jeune Afrique, 5 November 2019.
[63] Statement of the DRC, Mine Ban Treaty Fourth Review Conference, Oslo, 28 November 2019.
[64] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[65] ICRC, “Annual Report 2019,” Geneva, June 2020, p. 154.
[66] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[67] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Christiane Matabaro, National Coordinator, ANASDIV, 5 July 2019.
[68] Statement of the DRC, Mine Ban Treaty Fourth Review Conference, Oslo, 28 November 2019.
[69] US Department of State, Department of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement (PM/WRA) “To Walk the Earth in Safety,” 2 April 2020, p. 12; and Polus Center, “The Democratic Republic of the Congo,” undated.
[70] US Department of State, “2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Democratic Republic of the Congo,” 11 March 2020.
[71] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Christiane Matabaro, National Coordinator, ANASDIV, 5 July 2019.
[72] Statement of the DRC, Mine Ban Treaty Fourth Review Conference, Oslo, 28 November 2019.
[73] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Sudi Alimasi Kimputu, National Coordinator, CCLAM, 18 August 2020.
[74] Ibid.
Mine Ban Policy
Policy
The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty on 2 May 2002, becoming a State Party on 1 November 2002. The National Commission to Fight Antipersonnel Mines was created in 2002.[1]
The DRC enacted legislation to implement the Mine Ban Treaty in 2011. “Law no. 11/007 implementing the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production, and Transfer of Antipersonnel Mines and on their Destruction in the Democratic Republic of the Congo” was promulgated by the president on 9 July 2011 and published in the official journal on 15 July 2011.[2] The law was first adopted in December 2010 and a final version adopted by Parliament on 16 June 2011.[3]
Law 11/007 prohibits the development, manufacture, production, acquisition, stockpiling, conservation, supply, sale, import, export, transfer, and use of antipersonnel mines or their components and also prohibits assistance, encouragement, or inducement in these activities.[4] The law establishes penal sanctions for persons violating its provisions of 10 years imprisonment and a fine of CDF10–20 million (about US$11,000–$22,000). The law also provides penal sanctions for legal entities (companies) guilty of violations of CDF10–20 million (about US$11,000–$22,000).[5] The law also contains provisions on victim assistance.
The DRC regularly attends meetings of the treaty, most recently the Seventeenth Meeting of States Parties in Geneva in November 2018, where it provided a statement on Article 5 clearance obligations, and the intersessional meetings in Geneva in May 2019, where it provided a statement on victim assistance.[6] The DRC also attended the Third Review Conference in Maputo in June 2014. The DRC provides updated Article 7 transparency reports semi-regularly, most recently in 2019.
The DRC is not party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons. It is a signatory state to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.
Production, transfer, use, stockpile destruction, and retention
The DRC is not known to have produced or exported antipersonnel mines. While government forces have used antipersonnel mines in the past, the Monitor has not received any allegations of such use since it acceded to the treaty. There were credible allegations of use of antipersonnel mines in the DRC by non-state armed groups (NSAGs) at least until 2004 and by Ugandan and Rwandan government forces in 2000.[7]
In May 2006, the DRC informed States Parties that it had completed the destruction of all 2,864 stockpiled antipersonnel mines it had been able to identify, thus fulfilling its treaty obligation to destroy stocks by 1 November 2006. It stated that if more stockpiled mines were discovered they would be destroyed in a timely fashion.[8]
Since May 2006, the DRC has destroyed newly discovered, seized, or turned in antipersonnel mines on many occasions. It reported an additional 198 mines destroyed in 2006, 936 in 2007, 631 in 2008, 101 in 2009, and 70 in 2010.[9]
In March 2010, a government official informed the Monitor that there were some live antipersonnel mines retained for training at the Military Engineers’ School in Likasi, but the types and numbers had not yet been reported.[10] Since 2011, the DRC has reported “not applicable” on Form D on mines retained for training or research purposes. In 2009, as in its previous report, the DRC stated that information on retained mines was “not yet available.”[11]
Non-state armed groups
NSAGs, both Congolese and foreign, remain active in the country.[12] In August 2009, a military officer reportedly stated that 25 soldiers had been killed by antipersonnel mines laid by the Democratic Liberation Forces of Rwanda (Forces Démocratiques de Liberation du Rwanda, FDLR, Rwandan Hutu rebels), and noted, “We are not aware of other antipersonnel mines planted in the area. Teams from the United Nations or other international bodies will be needed to clear the mines.”[13] The Monitor could not confirm if this constituted new use of antipersonnel mines, or if so, by whom.
[1] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form A, 30 April 2003; and see also Landmine Monitor Report 2006, p. 325.
[2] Email from André Tabaro, Coordinator, National Association of Landmine Survivors, 19 August 2011.
[3] The law was first adopted in December 2010, but there were differences between the versions adopted by the Senate and the National Assembly so a reconciled version was adopted on 16 June 2011. ICBL meeting with Sudi Kimputu, Coordinator, National Focal Point for Mine Action in DRC, and Charles Frisby, Chief of Staff, DRC Mine Action Coordination Center, in Geneva, 23 June 2011.
[4] “Proposition de loi portant mise en oeuvre de la Convention sur l’interdiction de l’emploi du stockage, de la production et du transfert des mines antipersonnel et sur leur destruction en Republic Democratique du Congo” (“Bill to implement the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production, and Transfer of Antipersonnel Mines and their Destruction in the Democratic Republic of Congo”), Assemblee Nationale-Senate Commission Mixte Paritarie, Kinshasa, June 2011, Articles 3 and 4.
[5] “Proposition de loi portant mise en oeuvre de la Convention sur l’interdiction de l’emploi du stockage, de la production et du transfert des mines antipersonnel et sur leur destruction en Republic Democratique du Congo” (“Bill to implement the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production, and Transfer of Antipersonnel Mines and their Destruction in the Democratic Republic of Congo”), Assemblee Nationale-Senate Commission Mixte Paritarie, Kinshasa, June 2011, Chapter 7. The law requires the immediate cessation of production of antipersonnel mines and for anyone, except government or other authorized public agencies, who produces or possesses antipersonnel mines or their components as referred to under Article 3, to immediately notify the Ministry of Defense or the Ministry of Civil Protection of the total stock, including the type, quantity, and where possible, lot number, for each type. Average exchange rate for 2010: US$1=CDF901.922. Oanda, www.oanda.com.
[6] Statement of the DRC, Mine Ban Treaty Seventeenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 29 November 2018; and statement of the DRC, Mine Ban Treaty Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 22 May 2019.
[7] See, Landmine Monitor Report 2009, p. 327.
[8] See, Landmine Monitor Report 2006, pp. 326–327. In May 2006, a representative did not indicate the date on which the DRC considered the program completed. The 2,864 mines destroyed included mines held in the military regions, mines recovered from NSAGs, and mines abandoned across the country. Apparently, it only included seven mines (Claymore type) held by the armed forces.
[9] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Reports, Form G, 30 April 2011, 30 April 2010, 22 May 2009, and 20 May 2008; Landmine Monitor Report 2009, p. 327; and Landmine Monitor Report 2008, p. 280. In 2010, the DRC reported 38 PMA-2 mines found and destroyed: 33 by Mechem in Kisangani; two by Handicap International (HI) Belgium and two by HI Federation in Oriental province; and one by Mines Advisory Group (MAG) in Bas-Congo province. As well, 16 TS-50 mines were found and destroyed: 10 by DanChurchAid; five by MAG in Katanga; and one by Handicap International Belgium in Oriental province. One PPM-2 mine was found and destroyed by MAG in Bas-Congo; 14 M35 mines were found and destroyed (nine by DCA and five by MAG in Katanga); and two mines of unknown types found and destroyed by MAG in September 2010. In 2009, the DRC reported 8 PMA-2 mines found and destroyed (one by MAG in Ikela, one by HI Belgium in Yengeni, and six by Mechem in Sange, Kisangani, and Bangboka); 43 TS-50 mines found and destroyed (41 by DCA in Kabumba, Mitondo, and Lubandula, one by MAG in Kirungu, and one by Mechem in Kisangani); one M2A4 mine, found and destroyed by Mechem in Bangboka; 21 M35 mines found and destroyed (15 handed over by the national armed forces [Forces Armées de la République Démocratique du Congo, FARDC] and destroyed by MAG in Lubumbashi, five by MAG in Lubumbashi and Selembe, and one by DCA at an unspecified location); one PROM 1 mine found and destroyed by MAG in Kasenga; two No. 4 mines found and destroyed by MAG in Ikela; eight Type 69 mines found and destroyed by MAG in Lubumbashi; and eight Type 58 mines found and destroyed by MAG in Gemena. The 101 reported also included nine Claymore Z1 mines, eight found and destroyed by MAG in Shamwana, Ikela, and Bomongo, and one by MECHEM in Bogoro. The reports do not explain whether the mines were discovered among FARDC arsenals or were discovered or seized from other sources, with the exception of 15 M35 mines handed over by the FARDC in November 2009.
[10] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Capt. Roger Bokwango, National Focal Point for Mine Action in DRC, 30 March 2010. In the original French: “Il y aurait quelques mines Antipersonnel réelles à l’école du Génie Militaire de Likasi, mais les types et les nombres n’ont pas encore été rapportés.”
[11] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form D, 22 May 2009.
[12] Foreign armed groups reported to be active or present in DRC included the FDLR, the Interahamwe (Rwanda), and the Lord’s Resistance Army (Uganda).
[13] “350 Rwandan Hutu militiamen killed during Operation Kimia II in South Kivu province,” Radio Okapi, 29 August 2009, congoplanet.com.
Support for Mine Action
In 2019, four donors contributed a total of US$6.9 million toward mine action in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), which represents a 12% decrease from 2018.[1]
The DRC also received in-kind assistance from Switzerland valued at $1.5 million to support mine clearance operations.[2]
The DRC has never reported any national contributions to its mine action program, but in its Third Article 5 deadline Extension Request, submitted in September 2020, the DRC committed to providing approximately $564,000 from 2021–2022.[3]
International contributions: 2019[4]
Donor |
Sector |
Amount (national currency) |
Amount (US$) |
United States |
Capacity-building, clearance, risk education, and victim assistance |
US$4,000,000 |
4,000,000 |
South Korea |
Capacity-building and clearance |
N/R |
1,260,000 |
Norway |
Clearance and risk education |
NOK11,000,000 |
1,249,986 |
UN CERF |
Capacity-building and clearance |
N/A |
398,807 |
Total |
N/A |
6,908,793 |
Note: N/A=not available; N/R=not reported. UN CERF=United Nations Central Emergency Response Fund.
In the five-year period from 2015–2019, international contributions to mine action activities in the DRC totaled more than $32 million, an average of some $6.5 million per year.
The DRC’s most recent Mine Ban Treaty extension request projected that a budget of $3.9 million would be required for 2021–2022, of which $2.4 million would go to demining and survey operations and $0.9 million to risk education activities, while the remainder would be used for coordination from its mine action center.[5]
Summary of international contributions: 2015–2019[6]
Year |
International contributions (US$) |
2019 |
6,908,793 |
2018 |
7,789,468 |
2017 |
5,729,912 |
2016 |
6,175,437 |
2015 |
5,811,610 |
Total |
32,415,220 |
[1] Email from Ingrid Schøyen, Senior Advisor, Humanitarian Affairs, Norway Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 5 June 2020; US Department of State Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement (PM/WRA), “To Walk the Earth in Safety 2019,” 2 April 2020; and United Nations Mine Action Service, ‘‘Annual Report 2019,’’ 22 April 2020, pp. 32–33.
[2] Switzerland Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form I, 28 April 2020. Annual exchange rate for 2019: CHF0.9937=US$1. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 2 January 2020.
[3] DRC Mine Ban Treaty Third Article 5 deadline Extension Request, 24 September 2020, pp. 45–46.
[4] Average exchange rate for 2019: NOK8.001=US$1. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 2 January 2020.
[5] DRC Mine Ban Treaty Third Article 5 deadline Extension Request, 24 September 2020, p. 116.
[6] See previous Monitor reports.