Sri Lanka

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

Last updated: 04 September 2020

Ten-Year Review: Sri Lanka acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 1 March 2018. Sri Lanka has participated in the convention’s meetings and served as president of the Ninth Meeting of States Parties in September 2019. It voted in favor of a key United Nations (UN) resolution promoting the convention in December 2019.

According to Sri Lanka’s initial transparency report provided in February 2019, it has never produced cluster munitions and does not possess a stockpile.

Policy

The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 1 March 2018 and the convention entered into force for the country on 1 September 2018.

Sri Lanka stated in September 2019 that it was “exploring…internal processes” to see if “a separate legal enactment to give effect to the Convention is required” or if “adequate legal provisions already exist, to enable the implementation of all Convention related obligations.”[1] Previously, in February 2019, Sri Lanka said it was checking to determine if new legislation is needed to enforce its implementation of the convention’s provisions.[2]

Since its accession to the convention in 2018, Sri Lanka’s Ministry of Defense has initiated a program to educate Sri Lanka’s security forces to ensure they comply with the convention’s provisions at all times.[3]

Sri Lanka submitted its initial Article 7 transparency report for the convention on 26 February 2019.[4]

Sri Lanka participated in one meeting of the Oslo Process that created the Convention on Cluster Munitions, in Vienna, Austria in December 2007. It attended a regional meeting on cluster munitions in Bali, Indonesia in November 2009.

Prior to its accession Sri Lanka participated as an observer in every meeting of the convention.[5] It participated as a State Party in the convention’s Eighth Meeting of States Parties in Geneva in September 2018. Sri Lanka served as President of the Ninth Meeting of States Parties, also in Geneva, in September 2019.

Sri Lanka has participated in several regional workshops on the convention, such as one hosted in Vientiane, Lao PDR in April 2019 and one held by the Philippines in Manila on 18–19 June 2019.

In December 2019, Sri Lanka voted in favor of a UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolution, which urges states outside the Convention on Cluster Munitions to “join as soon as possible.”[6] It has voted in favor of the annual UNGA resolution promoting the convention since it was first introduced in 2015.

Sri Lanka has also voted in favor of UNGA resolutions condemning the use of cluster munitions in Syria, most recently in December 2018.[7]

Sri Lanka acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty on 13 December 2017. Sri Lanka is also a party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons.

Production, transfer, and stockpiling

In February 2019, Sri Lanka reported that it has not produced cluster munitions and does not possess any stocks of cluster munitions, including for research and training purposes.[8]

Use

In September 2018, Sri Lanka stated that it “has never used cluster munitions.”[9] Previously, Sri Lankan officials repeatedly stated that its armed forces did not possess cluster munitions and never used the weapon.[10]

Past allegations of use

Sri Lanka has emphatically denied claims that it used cluster munitions in 2008–2009 in the northern Vanni region.[11] In 2017, Sri Lanka said that with respect to allegations of cluster munition use during its military operation against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), the “Sri Lanka Army, Sri Lanka Navy and Sri Lanka Air Force re-iterated their earlier stand that they have never used Cluster Munitions”[12]

In 2016, it was reported that three mine clearance operators had cleared cluster munition remnants, including unexploded submunitions, from at least six different sites in the north of the country since 2009.[13] The reports quoted an operator, who said it could not be determined who used the cluster munitions or when, but said they could have been used “any time within the last three decades.”

The Sri Lankan Air Force possesses aircraft capable of delivering Soviet-made cluster munitions, while the LTTE had light planes incapable of carrying them. The Indian Air Force possesses RBK-500 series cluster bombs and was involved in a military intervention against the LTTE in northern Sri Lanka in 1987–1990.



[1] Statement of Sri Lanka, Convention on Cluster Munitions Ninth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 2 September 2019.

[2] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form A, 26 February 2019.

[3] Statement on Clearance, Convention on Cluster Munitions Ninth Meeting of States Parties, 3 September 2019.

[4] The report covers an initial period and every form states ‘’nil’’ with the exception of Form A on national implementation measures. As of August 2020, Sri Lanka has not provided an annual updated report for the convention. The report was due by 30 April 2020.

[5] Sri Lanka has participated as an observer in every Meeting of States Parties of the convention since 2011. Sri Lanka also attended the First Review Conference in 2015.

[6]Implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 74/62, 12 December 2019.

[7]Situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic,” UNGA Resolution 73/182, 17 December 2018. Sri Lanka abstained from the vote on a similar resolution in December 2019.

[8] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Forms B, C, D and E, 26 February 2019.

[9] Statement of Sri Lanka, Convention on Cluster Munitions Eighth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 3 September 2018.

[10] Statement of Sri Lanka, Convention on Cluster Munitions First Review Conference, Dubrovnik, 9 September 2015. Notes by the Monitor. See also, Monitor meeting with Amb. Dr. Palitha T.B. Kohona, and Dilup Nanyakkara, Advisor, Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka to the UN in New York, New York, 19 October 2010.

[11] See, Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 242–243. In October 2009, Sri Lankan Army Commander Lt.-Gen. J. Jayasuriya stated, “Where the cluster munitions are concerned, I wish to categorically state that such inhumane weapons have never, and will never be used by the Sri Lankan Armed Forces.” See also, “Flow of arms to terrorists must stop,” Daily News, 28 October 2009. In early 2009, a media report alleged that Sri Lankan forces used cluster munitions against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, while attacking Pudukkudyirippu Hospital. “U.N. cites Sri Lanka cluster bomb use: The U.S., EU, Norway and Japan join in a plea to the Tamil Tiger rebels to end their failing separatist struggle and avoid more deaths,” Los Angeles Times, 4 February 2009. A UN spokesperson initially said the hospital was attacked with cluster munitions, but retracted the statement after further investigation. See, “UN accepts Sri Lanka has not used cluster bombs – website,” BBC Monitoring South Asia, 5 February 2009; and Walter Jayawardhana, “UN Spokesman Accepts Sri Lanka Never Had Cluster Bombs,” Ministry of Defence, 5 February 2009. In 2011, a UN Panel of Experts report noted the government’s denial and said that it was unable to reach a conclusion on the credibility of the allegation of use of cluster munitions by Sri Lanka. Report of the Secretary General’s Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka, 31 March 2011, p. 47.

[12] Email from Mafusa Lafir, Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka to the UN in Geneva, to Mary Wareham, Arms Division, HRW, 26 May 2017. In 2016, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) recommended the Sri Lankan government investigate the allegations of past cluster munition use, stating that, “the High Commissioner calls for an independent and impartial investigation to be carried out” following “recent reports on new evidence that has emerged on the use of cluster munitions towards the end of the conflict, following similar allegations in the OHCHR investigation report.” See OHCHR, “Promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka,” A/HRC/32/CRP.4, 28 June 2016, p. 8.

[13] The Guardian published photographs showing clearance operators preparing to destroy the remnants of an RBK-500 AO-2.5RT cluster bomb and reported that HALO Trust had cleared 42 cluster munitions—likely submunitions—from sites near Pachchilapalli. Emmanuel Stoakes, “Sri Lanka denies cluster bombs found in war zones were government weapons,” The Guardian, 26 June 2016. See also, Emmanuel Stoakes, “Cluster bombs used in Sri Lanka's civil war, leaked photos suggest,” The Guardian, 20 June 2016.


Impact

Last updated: 19 April 2021

Jump to a specific section of the profile:

Treaty Status | Management & Coordination | Impact (contamination & casualties) | Addressing the Impact (land release, risk education, victim assistance)

Country summary

The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka is extensively contaminated by mines and explosive remnants of war (ERW). The Northern province is by far the most affected, though limited contamination remains in the Eastern province, and in Northcentral, Northwestern, and Western provinces. The north of the country was the focus of three decades of armed conflict between the government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), which ended in May 2009.Both sides made extensive use of mines, including belts of P4 Mk I and Mk II blast antipersonnel mines laid by the Sri Lankan Army (SLA), and long defensive lines with a mixture of mines and improvised explosive devices (IEDs) laid by the LTTE.[1] Indian Peacekeeping Forces also used mines during their presence from July 1987 to January 1990.[2]

Sri Lanka had initially projected completion of mine clearance by the end of 2020. However, it reported that insufficient levels of international funding combined with identification of 2.88km2 ofnew contamination during 2019 meant that the clearance completion date had been pushed beyond 2020.[3] Sri Lanka anticipates completion of clearance by 2025.[4]

It has been reported that since 2009, three mine clearance organizations have cleared cluster munition remnants, including unexploded submunitions, from at least six different sites in the north of Sri Lanka.[5] The time period when the contamination occurred was not identified.

Risk education and victim assistance in Sri Lanka are coordinated by the National Mine Action Center (NMAC) and relevant government ministries, with the support of the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and international non-governmental organizations (NGOs).[6] Since 2010, the phasing out of services by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Humanity & Inclusion (HI), and UNICEF resulted in a decrease in the availability of victim assistance.[7] Rehabilitation services continued to provide prosthetics and were expanded in 2019.

Treaty status

Treaty status overview

Mine Ban Treaty

State Party

Article 5 clearance deadline: 1 June 2028

Convention on Cluster Munitions

State Party

Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)

State Party

 

According to Sri Lanka’s National Mine Action Strategy 2016–2020, the National Mine Action Center (NMAC) had initially anticipated that clearance would be completed in 2020. However, this target was contingent upon receiving a projected amount of funding which was not obtained. This was combined with the identification of new contamination in 2019 which led NMAC to project that clearance would be completed beyond 2020, although not later than 2025.[8]

Management and coordination

Mine action management and coordination

Mine action management and coordination overview

Mine action commenced

2002

National mine action management actors

National Steering Committee for Mine Action (NSCMA)
National Mine Action Center (NMAC)
Regional Mine Action Office (RMAO) in Kilinochchi
District Steering Committees for Mine Action

Mine action strategic and operational plans

National Mine Action Strategy for 2016–2020

Mine action standards

National Mine Action Standards (NMAS) were reviewed in 2017, awaiting finalization as of December 2019

 

Coordination

The Ministry of Rehabilitation, Resettlement, and Hindu Religious Affairs became the lead agency for mine action in 2015, as chair of the inter-ministerial National Steering Committee for Mine Action (NSCMA). This body sets policy and manages linkages within the government, the mine action community, and donors.[9] Its policies and decisions are implemented by the NMAC, which was set up in 2010. The role of the NMAC is to liaise with government ministries and development partners regarding mine action, as well as to develop a strategic plan and production of annual workplans. The NMAC is also responsible for accrediting mine action operators, setting national standards, and acting as the secretariat of NSCMA.[10]

Clearance operations are coordinated, tasked, and quality managed by a Regional Mine Action Office (RMAO) in Kilinochchi, working in consultation with District Steering Committees for Mine Action. The committees are chaired by government agents heading district authorities.[11]

Under its National Mine Action Strategy for 2016–2020, the government of Sri Lanka intends to convene steering committee meetings for mine action up to twice per year at national level and at three regional levels, one for Eastern province and two for Northern province.[12]

Information management

Sri Lanka’s Information Management System for Mine Action (IMSMA) was updated in 2015 and had since undergone substantial and continuing improvements, including the correction of erroneous data and updating the database on the basis of re-survey results, leading to a more accurate representation of remaining contamination.[13]

Risk education management and coordination

Risk education management and coordination overview

Government focal points

NMAC

Coordination mechanisms

Unknown

Risk education standards

Risk education chapter in the National Mine Action Standards (NMAS) which were awaiting finalization as of December 2019

 

Coordination

UNICEF works with NMAC in order to support risk education activities which is conducted within schools through the Ministry of Education and at community level through local NGOs.[14]

Victim assistance management and coordination

Victim assistance management and coordination overview[15]

Government focal points

Ministry of Social Services: focal point for matters pertaining to persons with disabilities

The ministries of defence, education, health, and social services: coordination on disability issues and victim assistance

Coordination mechanisms

None specific to victim assistance, NMAC is involved in the coordination of victim assistance programs

Coordination regularity and outcomes

None

Plans/strategies

National Disability Policy, 2003

National Action Plan for 2019–2021 contains two commitments towards persons with disabilities

Survivor inclusion and participation

Sri Lanka needs to improve survivor inclusion, accessibility to services and service effectiveness

 

Coordination between the mine action sector and other relevant state entities, particularly the National Disability Council and the Ministry of Health required improvement.[16]

The ministries of defense, education, health, and social services, and the Directorate of Rehabilitation coordinate victim assistance services.[17] The National Secretariat for Persons with Disabilities sits under the Ministry of Social Services and the Ministry of Social Welfare. It works to promote, improve and ensure the rights of persons with disabilities through guidance, support, coordination, implementation, and monitoring of development activities.[18]

UNICEF supported NMAC in coordinating and providing victim assistance.[19] UNICEF supports the Ministry of Social Services in implementing a national level coordination mechanism on assisting children with disabilities. This coordination mechanism includes government ministries, UNICEF, and NGOs.[20]

Laws and policies

Disability legislation, Act No. 28 of 1996 addresses access to education, employment and physical accessibility to public places.

Sri Lanka’s National Action Plan for 2019–2021 contains two commitments towards persons with disabilities. Commitment No. 8 aims to minimize the economic and social disadvantages faced by persons with disabilities by providing disability-friendly housing facilities to 3,200 identified low-income families by 2020. Commitment No. 9 is to formulate a Disability Rights Bill with public participation in line with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). The goal was to have this bill enacted by parliament before the end of 2020.[21]

Various laws prohibit discrimination against any person disabilities in employment, education, air travel, other public transportation, and access to health care. In practice, however, discrimination occurred in employment, education, and provision of state services, including public transportation. There were regulations on accessibility, but accommodation for access to buildings and public transportation for persons with disabilities was rare. Children with disabilities attended school at a lower rate than other persons.[22]

Impact

Contamination

Contamination overview (as of December 2019)[23]

Landmines

22.2km² (CHA: 20.8km² and SHA: 1.4km²)

Extent of contamination: Large

Cluster munition remnants

Unknown

Other ERW contamination

Unknown

Note: CHA=Confirmed Hazardous Area; ERW=explosive remnants of war; and SHA=suspected hazardous area.

 

Landmine contamination

Mine contamination remains in the Northern, Eastern and North-Central provinces with a total of 285 confirmed hazardous areas (CHAs) and nine suspected hazardous areas (SHAs).[24] The most significant mine contamination is found in the Northern Province, which was the scene of intense fighting during the civil war. By the end of 2019, there were 275 CHAs totaling 20.31km2 and nine SHAs totaling 1.39km2 in the north. In the Eastern Province, there were seven CHAs which totaled 0.31km2, while three CHAs totaling 0.16km2 remained in the North Central Province.[25]

The total amount of CHAs and SHAs has increased slightly since 2017 as a result of the livelihood activities of resettled internally displaced persons (IDPs) identifying new SHAs. Technical survey was conducted in these new areas and the CHAs were added to the total contamination figure.[26]

The SLA used both antipersonnel and antivehicle mines, with all use said to have been recorded.[27] Operators have encountered a wide range of LTTE devices, including antipersonnel mines with anti-tilt and anti-lift mechanisms. Tripwire-activated Claymore-type mines and, to a lesser extent, antivehicle mines, were also used by the LTTE, along with a number of improvised devices.[28]

It is estimated that 80% of those living in contaminated rural areas in the north of the country are farmers or fishermen who rely directly on the land to survive. Continued contamination is therefore increasing disparity in wealth and development between the north and south of the country.[29]

Cluster munition remnant contamination

Since 2009, three mine demining organizations had cleared cluster munition remnants, including unexploded submunitions, from at least six different sites in the north of the country.[30] A report quoted an operator, who said it could not be determined who used the cluster munitions or when, but said they could have been used “any time within the last three decades.”[31] Sri Lanka’s initial Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report submitted in 2019 and its subsequent 2020 transparency report stated that there was no cluster munition contamination.[32]

ERW contamination

Sri Lanka remains contaminated with a wide range of ERW, including unexploded air-dropped bombs, artillery shells and missiles, mortar bombs, handheld anti-tank projectiles, and rifle and hand grenades. Large caches of abandoned explosive ordnance (AXO) also exist, particularly in the north.[33] These are being cleared concurrently to the remaining minefields.[34]

Casualties

Casualties overview[35]

Casualties

All known mine/ERW casualties (from 1999 to 2019)

1,195 (144 killed; 579 injured; 472 unknown)

 

Casualties in 2019

Annual total

10 (increase from 9 in 2018)

 

Survival outcome

1 killed; 9 injured

Device type causing casualties

2 unspecified mine types; 8 mines/ERW (undifferentiated)

Civilian status

2 deminers; 8 civilian status unknown

Age and gender

All adults (3 women and 7 men)

 

Casualties in 2019: details

Ten mine/ERW casualties were recorded in 2019. Two women deminers were injured. Sri Lanka reported another eight casualties recorded in the IMSMA database.[36]

From 1999 to the end of 2019, the Monitor identified 1,195 casualties in Sri Lanka (144 killed; 579 injured; 472 unknown). In April 2010, it was reported that since the 1980s there were a total of 21,993 mine casualties, including 1,419 civilian returnees; 3,770 recorded amputees among the armed forces, police, and civil defense forces; and 16,804 mine casualties among the non-state armed group, LTTE.[37] In 2015, UNICEF reported that since the 1980s some 22,177 mine/ERW casualties had been recorded, including 1,603 civilian casualties. However, from 2006 to 2009 accurate casualty information was difficult to access due to ongoing conflict, likely resulting in under-reporting.[38]

No cluster munition casualties have been recorded in Sri Lanka by the Monitor. In 2019, the International Truth and Justice Project (ITJP) published a report including casualties and injuries from what were described as cluster munitions. However, the weapon was reported with the designation of OFAB 500 ShR, a parachute-retarded aerial bomb with multiple warheads which, due to its size and weight does not meet the Convention on Cluster Munitions definition of a cluster munition.[39] This designation was consistent with reporting and images from use of OFAB 500 ShR in 2008.[40]

Addressing the impact

Mine action

Operators and service providers

Clearance operators[41]

National

Sri Lankan Army (SLA)

Delvon Assistance for Social Harmony (DASH) and its national subcontractor Skavita Humanitarian Assistance and Relief Project (SHARP)

International

The HALO Trust

The Mines Advisory Group (MAG)

 

Clearance

Land release overview[42]

Landmine clearance in 2019

6.31km2 cleared

4.43km2 cancelled

Progress

Sri Lanka reported that insufficient international funding combined with the identification of 2.88km2 ofnewcontamination in 2019 meant that the clearance completion was pushed beyond 2020 but expected by 2025

 

Land release: landmines

Since humanitarian mine action clearance began in 2002 up until 31 July 2020, Sri Lanka has reported releasing 4,775 areas totaling 1,290.85km2.[43]

Estimates of total contamination fell sharply between 2010– 2018: from 506km2 at the end of 2010 to just under 26km2 as of July 2018.[44] The size of the contaminated area then plateaued slightly, with a combined suspected and confirmed hazardous area of some 22km2 remaining at the end of 2019.[45] Batticaloa district in Eastern province was the first to be declared free of the threat of mines in June 2017.[46]

Sri Lanka has estimated that the annual funding requirement of sustaining its national mine action program at the existing level is approximately US$20 million.[47]

Risk education

Operators and service providers

Risk education operators[48]

Type of organization

Name of organization

Type of activity

Governmental

NMAC in coordination with relevant ministries

Age-appropriate risk education has been incorporated into the school curriculum in the Northern and Eastern provinces

 

International

UNICEF

Supports risk education activities

 

From January 2009 to the end of 2019, around 562,500 community members have received risk education messaging.[49]

Community liaison teams from national risk education organizations, such as Caritas Valvuthayam, People Vision, Rural Development Foundation, Sarvodaya, and Social Organisation for Development (SOND), conduct risk education under the auspices of the NMAC.[50]

Women and schoolgirls work with the national risk education organizations to reach out to families and act as peer group influencers.[51]

Target groups

NMAC considers people from the south of Sri Lanka and visiting the north and east of the country to be at risk from mines and other ERW. Specific livelihoods such as scrap metal collectors, firewood collectors and farmers are also considered high risk.[52]

Delivery methods

The NMAC does not usually permit international NGOs to deliver risk education.[53] Age-appropriate risk education has been incorporated into the school curriculum in the northern and eastern provinces.[54]

Marking

The areas known or suspected to contain antipersonnel mines have all been prominently marked with signs and signboards displayed in the Sinhala, Tamil, and English languages. Signs are maintained and replaced on a regular basis.[55]

Victim assistance

Victim assistance providers and activities[56]

Type of organization

Name of organization

Type of activity

Governmental

The Ministry of Social Services

Responsible for matters pertaining to persons with disabilities.

 

The Ranaviru Sevana Rehabilitation Centre

Physical rehabilitation, social support, economic inclusion, and other assistance to disabled veterans

National

The Jaffna Jaipur Centre for Disability Rehabilitation (JJCDR)

Prosthetic limbs and rehabilitation services, psychosocial support

Social Organizations Networking for Development (SOND)

Emergency assistance and economic assistance to new survivors

Caritas Valvuthayam Mannar

Prosthetics and mobility devices through Mannar Rehabilitation Center

International

The Meththa Foundation

Prosthetics and mobility devices

Humanity & Inclusion (HI)

Disability inclusion projects and rehabilitative care

 

Needs assessment

Sri Lanka had no needs assessment or data on indirect victims of mines/ERW.

Medical care and rehabilitation

Sri Lanka reported that as the major component of the victim assistance program, medical care in the country had made significant improvement in its services and that people with traumatic lower limb injuries from causes such as antipersonnel mines or ERW, received adequate services.[57]

The Jaffna Jaipur Centre for Disability Rehabilitation (JJCDR) provided prosthetics using ICRC technology, rehabilitation and socioeconomic support, as well as visited amputees at the government-run Jaffna Teaching Hospital for post amputation care. It also made field visits to mine/ERW survivors, people with disabilities from war related causes and other persons with disabilities to refer them for services. The JJCDR was established informally in 1987 to provide prosthetics to civilian war victims, and was officially registered in 2001. In September 2020, a special discussion was held at the JJCDR on its sustainability and during which a “dire need” for follow up on future resourcing was recognized.[58]

Sri Lanka reported the following rehabilitation hospitals as operating in the country and that provided physical rehabilitation, including to landmine survivors: Digana Rehabilitation Hospital; Jayanthipura Rehabilitation Hospital; Kandagolla Rehabilitation Hospital; Maliban Rehabilitation Hospital; and Ragama Rheumatology & Rehabilitation Hospital. A state-of-the-art rehabilitation unit was constructed at Jaffna Teaching Hospital.[59]

The Jaffna Teaching Hospital is the only hospital in the province run by the central government in Colombo. In July 2019, the Sabah Al Ahmad Center for Physical Rehabilitation was opened at the Jaffna Teaching Hospital. The project was funded by the Kuwait Red Crescent at the request of the Ministry of Health of Sri Lanka.[60]

Caritas Valvuthayam Mannar works directly with NMAC in providing victim assistance services. The organization provides prosthetics and mobility devices through Mannar Rehabilitation Center. It ran an outreach program to areas including Kilinochchi, Mullaithievu, and Puttalam.[61]

The Ranaviru Sevana Rehabilitation Centre is a government-run center that provides physical rehabilitation, social support, economic inclusion, and other assistance to disabled veterans.[62]

Sri Lanka reported that mental health services are available in the Northern Province and the mental health network has improved. Basic counselling services were available and being further developed.[63]

Socio-economic and psychosocial inclusion

HI conducted the project “INSPIRE”, supported by the Union of European Football Association (UEFA) Foundation for Children, which organizes fun and sporting activities for children and young people, in particular those with disabilities.

There is a general absence of efforts to guarantee the right of persons with disabilities, including landmine survivors, to live independently and to be included in the community, particularly in rural areas.[64]



[1] Interviews with demining operators, Colombo, 29 March–2 April 2010; and with Maj. Pradeep Gamage, Officer-in-Charge, North Jaffna Humanitarian Demining Unit (HDU), Jaffna, 3 April 2007.

[2] Ministry of Prison Reforms, Rehabilitation, Resettlement, and Hindu Religious Affairs, “Sri Lanka National Mine Action Strategy 2016–2020,” May 2016, p. 6.

[3] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 3.

[4] Madeline Keck, “Sri Lanka Set to Be Landmine-Free by 2025 Thanks to New Australian Aid Injection,” Global Citizen, 25 August 2020.

[5] Emmanuel Stoakes, “Sri Lanka denies cluster bombs found in war zones were government weapons,” The Guardian, 26 June 2016. See also, Emmanuel Stoakes, “Cluster bombs used in Sri Lanka's civil war, leaked photos suggest,” The Guardian, 20 June 2016.

[6] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), pp. 15–16.

[7] Vidya Abhayagunawardena and Sindhu Ratnarajan, “Sri Lanka Needs a Comprehensive Approach to Victim Assistance (VA),” in, Sri Lanka’s Mine Action Story: Achievements, Challenges and Opportunities, Sri Lanka Campaign to Ban Landmines, Colombo, 2019, p. 36.

[8] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 3; and Madeleine Keck, “Sri Lanka Set to Be Landmine-Free by 2025 Thanks to New Australian Aid Injection,” Global Citizen, 25 August 2020.

[9] Ministry of Economic Development, “The National Strategy for Mine Action in Sri Lanka,” September 2010, p. 9; and email from Sri Mallikarachchi, Senior IMSMA Officer, NMAC, 13 October 2015. After Sri Lanka’s January 2015 presidential elections and change of government, the Ministry of Economic Development, which formerly housed NMAC, was dismantled. A March 2015 cabinet memorandum then assigned development activity, implemented by the former Ministry of Economic Development, to other relevant ministries. This resulted in responsibility for the national mine action program being assigned to the Ministry of Prison Reforms, Rehabilitation, Resettlement, and Hindu Religious Affairs. See, Sri Lanka National Mine Action Strategy 2016–2020, May 2016, p. 10.

[10] Email from Amanthi Wickramasinghe, Programme Officer, Peace and Recovery, UNDP, Colombo, 11 March 2011.

[11] Sri Lanka National Mine Action Strategy 2016–2020, May 2016, p. 9. The strategy states that: “Steering committees used to play an important role in providing guidance to the mine action programme and in promoting transparency and accountability. At the national level the Steering Committee fulfilled the role of a National Mine Action Authority. It used to convene key national stakeholders including the SLA and relevant Ministries, mine action NGOs and main development partners. At regional and district levels, steering committees were tasked to ensure priority-setting of survey, clearance and MRE activities.”

[12] Sri Lanka National Mine Action Strategy 2016–2020, May 2016, p. 10.

[13] Emails from Bartholomew Digby, HALO Trust, 5 March 2018; from Alistair Moir, MAG, 8 August 2018, and 21 August 2017; and from Helaine Boyd, HALO Trust, 25 April 2017.

[14] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 22.

[15] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 15; and Nillasi Liyanage, “Women In The Context Of Post-War Sri Lanka’s Mine Action,” Colombo Telegraph, 4 April 2019.

[16] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 20.

[17] Ibid., p. 15.

[18] See, Sahanaya Resource and Information Center, “Centres for physically challenged,” undated.

[19] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 15.

[20] Ibid.

[21] Sri Lanka’s Second National Action Plan 2019–2021, Open Government Partnership, pp. 3 and 18.

[22] United States (US) Department of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, “2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Sri Lanka,” p. 23.

[23] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 10.

[24] Ibid.

[25] Ibid.

[26] Ibid.

[27] Ministry of Prison Reforms, Rehabilitation, Resettlement, and Hindu Religious Affairs, Sri Lanka National Mine Action Strategy 2016–2020, May 2016, p. 6; and interview with Rob Syfret, Operations Manager, HALO Trust, in Kilinochchi, 12 September 2016.

[28] Email from Valon Kumnova, HALO Trust, 11 April 2014; and Sri Lanka National Mine Action Strategy 2016–2020, May 2016, p. 6. The improvised devices included those designed to act as fragmentation mines, bar mines, electrical and magnetically initiated explosive devices, and mines connected to detonating cord to mortar and artillery shells.

[29] Nicholas Muller, “Sri Lanka’s Landmine Legacy,” The Diplomat, 28 January 2020.

[30] The Guardian published photographs that show clearance operators preparing to destroy the remnants of an RBK-500 AO-2.5RT cluster bomb. It reported that the HALO Trust cleared 42 cluster munitions—likely submunitions—from sites near Pachchilapalli, which saw fighting between government and LTTE forces at the end of the war. The HALO Trust said it reported the clearance at the time by submitting the records to the government-run mine action center. Emmanuel Stoakes, “Sri Lanka denies cluster bombs found in war zones were government weapons,” The Guardian, 26 June 2016. See also, Emmanuel Stoakes, “Cluster bombs used in Sri Lanka’s civil war, leaked photos suggest,” The Guardian, 20 June 2016.

[31] Emmanuel Stoakes, ‘Sri Lanka denies cluster bombs found in war zones were government weapons’, The Guardian, 26 June 2016.

[32] Sri Lanka Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, 26 February 2019); and Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019).

[33] Sri Lanka National Mine Action Strategy 2016–2020, May 2016, p. 6.

[34] Email from Matthew Hovell, Regional Director, HALO Trust, 30 September 2018.

[35] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 13; and “Two female de-miners injured in accidental explosion in northern Sri Lanka,” Xinhua, 19 April 2019. The Monitor also conducted a media analysis in order to supplement figures provided by NMAC in Sri Lanka’s Article 7 Report.

[36] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Transparency Report (for calendar year 2019), pp. 13 and 16.

[37] Statement by Brig. Udaya Nanayakkara, Chief Field Engineer, Sri Lanka Army, in “On landmines and explosive remnants of war: raising awareness and taking Action,” Asian Tribune (Colombo), 30 April 2010. Although not stated, presumably all these casualties were included in the 30-year total.

[38] Email from Mihlar Mohamed, UNICEF, Colombo, 11 May 2015.

[39] International Truth and Justice Project, “Buried Wounds: Sri Lanka’s Cluster Munition Victims,” August 2019.

[41] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 4; and Delvon Assistance for Social Harmony (DASH) website.

[42] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 3; and Keck M, “Sri Lanka Set to Be Landmine-Free by 2025 Thanks to New Australian Aid Injection,” Global Citizen, 25 August 2020.

[43] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 11.

[44] Emails from Mahinda Bandara Wickramasingha, Assistant Director Operations, Quality Management, and Planning, Chairman Accreditation Committee, NMAC, 8 and 9 October 2018.

[45] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 10.

[46] Email from Alistair Moir, MAG, 27 September 2017.

[47] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 13.

[48] Ibid., pp. 13 and 15.

[49] Ibid., p. 22.

[50] Ibid., p. 13; and Sebastian Kasack and Mihlar Mohamed, “Mine Risk Education: A Proven Life-Saver in Post-War Sri Lanka,” in, Sri Lanka’s Mine Action Story: Achievements, Challenges and Opportunities, Sri Lanka Campaign to Ban Landmines, Colombo, 2019, p. 49.

[51] Nillasi Liyanage, “Women in the context of post-war Sri Lanka’s mine action,” Colombo Telegraph, 4 April 2019.

[52] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 22.

[53] Email from Valentina Stivanello, Country Director, MAG, 15 May 2020.

[54] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 13.

[55] Ibid.

[56] Ibid., p. 16; Manohari Katugampala, “Getting them on their feet,” Daily News, 9 December 2020; Vidya Abhayagunawardena and Sindhu Ratnarajan, “Sri Lanka Needs a Comprehensive Approach to Victim Assistance (VA),” in, Sri Lanka’s Mine Action Story: Achievements, Challenges and Opportunities, Sri Lanka Campaign to Ban Landmines, Colombo, 2019, p. 36; The Jaffna Jaipur Centre website SOND website; Caritas Valvuthayam Mannar website; The Meththa Foundation website; HI, Sri Lanka webpage.

[57] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 18.

[58] JJCDR, “Discussion on Sustainability,” 25 September 2020.

[59] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 18.

[61] See, Caritas Valvuthayam Mannar website; Vidya Abhayagunawardena and Sindhu Ratnarajan, “Sri Lanka Needs a Comprehensive Approach to Victim Assistance (VA)” in, Sri Lanka’s Mine Action Story: Achievements, Challenges and Opportunities, Sri Lanka Campaign to Ban Landmines, Colombo, 2019, p. 36.

[62] Manohari Katugampala, “Getting them on their feet,” Daily News, 9 December 2020.

[63] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 19.

[64] Ibid., p. 20.


Mine Ban Policy

Last updated: 19 October 2020

Policy

The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty on 13 December 2017, and the treaty entered into force for the country on 1 June 2018.

In November 2018, Sri Lanka reported that it is in the process of creating implementation legislation for the Mine Ban Treaty.[1] Draft legislation is being reviewed by “key stakeholders, including the Ministry of Defence,” prior to being submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers for final approval.[2] It provided the same report in April 2019 and did not provide an update at the intersessional meetings in June 2019, so it is unclear how much progress has been made.

As of 15 October 2020, Sri Lanka had not provided an updated annual Article 7 report, which was due in April 2020. In November 2018, Sri Lanka provided an initial Article 7 report, which provided information “as of 28 November 2018.”[3] In April 2019, Sri Lanka provided an updated Article 7 report.[4] Previously, Sri Lanka submitted a voluntary Article 7 report in 2005.

Sri Lanka participated in the Mine Ban Treaty’s Fourth Review Conference in Oslo, Norway in November 2019, where it made a statement during the High-Level segment, and during the sessions on victim assistance and international cooperation and assistance. Sri Lanka also participated in the online intersessional meetings in June–July 2020.

Sri Lanka is a party to the Convention on Cluster Munitions. It is also party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) and its Amended Protocol II on landmines.

Production, Transfer, and Use

There is no evidence that the government of Sri Lanka has ever produced or exported antipersonnel mines. Sri Lanka’s declared stockpile of antipersonnel landmines includes mines of Belgian, Chinese, Italian (or Singaporean), and Pakistani origin, as well as unknown mine types.[5]

Since the end of armed conflict in May 2009, the Monitor has not received any reports of new use of antipersonnel mines by any entity in Sri Lanka.

In October 2009, Sri Lanka Army Commander, Lieutenant General Jagath Jayasuriya, said that “the use of mines by the Sri Lankan military is strictly limited and restricted to defensive purposes only…to demarcate and defend military installations” adding that mined areas are “marked accordingly…and relevant records systematically maintained.”[6] Earlier in 2009, Brigadier Lasantha Wickramasuriya acknowledged that the Sri Lanka Army had used antipersonnel mines in the past and used non-detectable Belgian, Chinese, and Italian mines, as well as bounding and fragmentation mines of Pakistani, Portuguese, and United States (US) manufacture.[7]

Prior to the end of armed conflict, in particular in 2008 and 2009, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) laid large numbers of mines throughout the north of Sri Lanka.[8] Prior to its demise, the LTTE was considered expert in making explosive weapons. It was known to produce several types of antipersonnel mines: Jony 95 (a small wooden box mine), Rangan 99 or Jony 99 (a copy of the P4 MK1 Pakistani mine), SN 96 (a Claymore-type mine), fragmentation antipersonnel mines from mortars, and variants of some of these antipersonnel mines, including some with anti-handling features, as well as Amman 2000 MK1 and MKII antivehicle mines.[9]

Between 1987–1990, the Indian military/Indian peacekeeping forces also used landmines in the northern and eastern parts of Sri Lanka.[10]

Stockpiling and destruction

Sri Lanka possesses a significant stockpile of antipersonnel mines. Sri Lanka’s deadline for destruction is 1 June 2029. However, in November 2018, Sri Lanka stated its intent to complete stockpile destruction by the end of 2020.[11]

In its initial Article 7 report, submitted on 28 November 2018, Sri Lanka declared a stockpile of 77,865 antipersonnel mines.

Antipersonnel mines formerly stockpiled by Sri Lanka[12]

Mine Type

Quantity

P4MK 1

1,828

P4MK 11

68,573

TYPE 72

1,334

VS 50

1,208

Type 1969

254

PRB 409

47

NEL (POF)

10

NEL (CH)

6

P4MK 2

4,605

Total

77,865

 

In November 2018, Sri Lanka announced that physical destruction of its stockpile had already started and that it intends to complete destruction by the end of 2020. Sri Lanka reported that the destruction of 57,033 antipersonnel mines had occurred prior to November 2018. Sri Lanka’s total stockpile prior to destruction commencing was 134,898 antipersonnel mines. The destruction that occurred prior to November 2018 is outlined in the table below.

In its May 2019 Article 7 report, Sri Lanka declared the destruction of 15,355 antipersonnel mines since its previous report. This is also shown in the following table.

Stockpiled antipersonnel mines destroyed by Sri Lanka

Mine Type

Quantity destroyed prior to November 2018

Quantity destroyed since initial Article 7 report

Quantity remaining

P4MK 1

5,222

0

1,828

P4MK 11

1,651

14,387

54,186

Type72

0

0

1,334

VS50

0

0

1,208

Type 1969

0

0

254

PRB 409

0

0

47

NEL (POF)

48,792

0

10

NEL (CH)

1,368

0

6

P4MK 1

0

0

1

P4MK 2

0

968

2,943

P4MK 2

0

0

693

Total

57,033

15,355

62,510

 

Sri Lanka has 41,357 of the 62,510 remaining antipersonnel mines marked for destruction. It intends to retain the remainder for research and training.

Retention

In its initial Article 7 report, Sri Lanka declared the retention of 21,153 antipersonnel mines and reported the same number in its subsequent Article 7 report, showing that no antipersonnel mines have been consumed during training or for research.

Antipersonnel mines retained by Sri Lanka (as of 31 December 2018)

Type

Quantity retained

P4MK 1

2,537

P4MK 11

12,829

Type 72

1,334

VS50

1,208

Type 1969

254

PRB 409

47

P4MK 2

2,944

Total

21,153

 

This represents the largest number of landmines currently retained by any State Party. Sri Lanka’s Article 7 report of May 2019 states that mines will be retained for training by the Sri Lanka Army, Air Force, Navy, and police forces.



[1] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, undated, ‘End of April 2019’. Section 2 of the report states, “The Cabinet of Ministers instructed the Ministry of Justice to liaise with the Legal Draftsman's Department to draft enabling legislation, considering the dualist nature of the Sri Lankan legal system. Accordingly, a preliminary draft has been made available to which the Attorney General’s Department has also provided their comments. Considering the importance of following an inclusive process, the draft will be taken up for discussion among all key stakeholders, including the Ministry of Defence, pursuant to being submitted for the final approval of the Cabinet of Ministers.”

[2] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form A, November 2018.

[3] Ibid.

[5] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, November 2018. 1,828 P4MK1 (Pakistan); 73,178 P4MK2 (Pakistan); 1,334 Type 72 (China); 1,208 VS50 (Italy); 254 Type 1969 (unknown); and 47 PRB409 (Belgian).

[6]Flow of arms to terrorists must stop,” The Sri Lanka Guardian, 28 October 2009.

[7] Presentation on Humanitarian Demining by Brig. Lasantha Wickramasuriya, Sri Lanka Army (SLA), Bangkok Workshop on Achieving a Mine-Free South-East Asia, 2 April 2009. The presentation included a section entitled, “Types of Mines Used by the Sri Lankan Army” followed by photographs and titles: P4MK1 (Pakistan antipersonnel mine); M72 (China antipersonnel mine); VS-50 (Italy antipersonnel mine); M16A1 (US bounding antipersonnel mine, however the photograph shows what appears to be a P7 MK 1 Pakistan or PRBM966 Portugal bounding mine); PRB 415 (photograph shows what appears to be an NR 409 Belgian antipersonnel mine); PRB 413 (photograph shows what appears to be a Portugal M421 antipersonnel mine); M15 and ND MK1 antivehicle mines; and M18A1 Claymore mines. The Monitor had previously reported that Sri Lanka acquired antipersonnel mines from China, Italy (or Singapore), Pakistan, Portugal, and perhaps Belgium, the US, and others. In its voluntary Article 7 report submitted in 2005, Sri Lanka noted the presence of these antipersonnel mines in minefields: P4MK1, P4MK2, P4MK3, P5MK1, Type 69 (Pakistan); PRB 413 (Portugal/Pakistan); PRB 409, M696 (Portugal); Type 66, Type 72 (China); and VS-50 (Italy/Singapore). Voluntary Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Forms C and H, 13 June 2005. The Monitor previously identified the following antipersonnel mines as having been used by government troops in the past: P4 and P3 MK (manufactured by Pakistan); Type 72, Type 72A, and Type 69 (China); VS-50 (Italy or Singapore); NR409/PRB (Belgium); M409 and M696 (Portugal); and M18A1 Claymore (US). See ICBL, Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 1,118; and Landmine Monitor Report 2005, p. 881.

[8] See, ICBL, Landmine Monitor Report 2010, p. 14.

[9] Presentation on Humanitarian Demining by Brig. Wickramasuriya at the Bangkok Workshop on Achieving a Mine-Free South-East Asia, Bangkok, 2 April 2009. Sri Lanka previously provided technical details of the Jony 95 and Jony 99 mines, which it identified as “produced and used” by the LTTE. Voluntary Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form H, 13 June 2005. See also, Landmine Monitor Report 2008, p. 1017. Maj. Mangala Balasuriya of the SLA Field Engineering Brigade stated that during the last stages of the war they encountered a modified antipersonnel landmine that used white phosphorus. Telephone interview with Maj. Mangala Herath, Filed Engineering Brigade, SLA, 25 June 2009.

[10] Statement by Sri Lanka, Mine Ban Treaty Seventeenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 26 November 2018.

[11] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form B, November 2018.

[12] The total number of P4MK 2 mines combines 3,912 reported by the Air Force and 693 reported by the police.


Support for Mine Action

Last updated: 16 November 2020

In 2019, international contributions from nine states and the European Union (EU) supporting clearance and risk education activities in the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka totaled US$15 million; which represents an increase of more than $7 million (105%) compared to 2018.[1]

Five donors contributed more than US$2 million each: the EU, Japan, the United States (US), Germany, and Norway. Sri Lanka did not receive international support for victim assistance in 2019. Instead, all funds were allocated to capacity-building, clearance, and risk education.

Sri Lanka has never reported its financial contribution to its mine action program. However, in a speech on the 2012 budget, then-President Mahinda Rajapaksa indicated that it was substantial, stating that since 2009 the army has been engaged in demining, rebuilding, and urban development at a cost of LKR5.4 billion (approximately $42 million).[2]

International contributions: 2019[3]

Donor

Sector

Amount (national currency)

Amount

(US$)

EU

Clearance

€2,500,000

2,798,500

Japan

Clearance

¥276,068,402

2,532,273

US

Clearance and risk education

$2,500,000

2,500,000

Germany

Clearance

€2,000,000

2,238,800

Norway

Clearance and risk education

NOK20,000,000

2,272,701

United Kingdom

Clearance

£1,480,893

1,890,804

Australia

Clearance

A$450,000

312,840

Sweden

Clearance

SEK2,169,953

229,372

Switzerland

Clearance

CHF160,000

161,014

Canada

Clearance and risk education

C$94,901

71,521

Total

 

N/A

15,007,825

Note: N/A=not applicable.

Since 2015, international contributions to mine action in Sri Lanka have totaled over $41 million, and averaged some $8.2 million per year.

International assistance to mine action has considerably varied in recent years, ranging from a low of $4.6 million in 2016 to a high of $15 million in 2019.

Summary of contributions: 2015–2019[4]

Year

Amount

(US$)

2019

15,007,825

2018

7,280,458

2017

8,516,563

2016

4,583,251

2015

5,614,583

Total

41,002,680



[1] Australia Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form I, 3 January 2020; Canada Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form J, 11 June 2020; email from Frank Meeussen, Disarmament, Non-Proliferation and Arms Export Control, European External Action Service, 30 August 2020; Germany Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form J, 16 March 2020; Japan Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form J, 30 March 2020; email from Ingrid Schøyen, Senior Advisor, Humanitarian Affairs, Norway Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 5 June 2020; email from Kajsa Aulin, Assistant Health Affairs and Disarmament, Permanent Mission of Sweden to the United Nations in Geneva, 24 September 2020; Switzerland Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form I, 28 April 2020; United Kingdom Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form J, 30 April 2020; and US Department of State Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement (PM/WRA), “To Walk the Earth in Safety 2019,” 2 April 2020.

[2] Ministry of Economic Development, “2012 Budget 100 Proposals for Development His Excellency the President Mahinda Rajapaksa presented the 2012 budget proposals to the parliament,” undated. Average exchange rate for 2012: LKR127.231=US$1, Oanda.com, Historical Exchange Rates.

[3] Average exchange rates for 2019: A$1=US$0.6952; €1=US$1.1194; NOK8.8001=US$1; C$1.3269=US$1; ¥109.02=US$1; SEK9.4604=US$1; CHF0.9937=US$1; £1=US$1.2768. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 2 January 2020.

[4] See previous Monitor reports.