Russian Federation

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

Last updated: 17 May 2022

[UPDATE May 2022: A Human Rights Watch (HRW) report documents Russian forces' use of cluster munitions in attacks across Ukraine. At least six types of cluster munition has been used by Russia since the beginning of its invasion in February 2022. Evidence indicates that Ukraine has used them at least once.]

Summary

Non-signatory Russia says it cannot join the convention as it regards cluster munitions as legitimate weapons despite the humanitarian risks associated with their use. Russia last participated in a meeting of the convention in 2012. It abstained from the vote on a key United Nations (UN) resolution in December 2020, which urged states outside the Convention on Cluster Munitions to “join as soon as possible.”

Russia—and the Soviet Union before it—is a major producer, stockpiler, and exporter of cluster munitions. Russia continued to develop newer models of cluster munitions in 2020, but there is no information on the status of any production and transfers. Russia has participated in a joint military operation with the Syrian government since September 2015, which has seen the widespread use of cluster munitions.

Policy

The Russian Federation has not acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

Russia is one of the most vocal critics of the convention and has not taken any steps to accede as it sees military utility in cluster munitions. Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov stated in 2016 that “our country strictly complies with its commitments, including with regard to cluster munitions (CMs) that Russia views as a legal means of warfare.”[1] In 2017, Russia said its assessment of the convention “has not changed” and called it “a politicized document that tailors the very definition” of cluster munitions “to the interests of individual states which are trying to preserve their one-sided military and technical advantages.”[2] Russia reiterated this position in November 2020, calling cluster munitions “a lawful form of munitions.”[3]

Russia never participated in the Oslo Process that produced the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[4] When the convention opened for signature in December 2008, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed Russia’s opposition to “unjustified restrictions and bans on cluster munitions,” which it defended as “a legitimate type of weapon that is not banned by international humanitarian law and plays a significant role in the defense interests of Russia.”[5]

Russia participated as an observer in meetings of the convention in 2010 and 2011. It has been invited to, but has not attended any of the convention’s meetings since then.[6]

In December 2020, Russia abstained from the vote on a key UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolution urging states outside the Convention on Cluster Munitions to “join as soon as possible.”[7] Russia has previously voted against the annual resolution promoting the convention.[8]

In 2014, Russia criticized and expressed “serious concern” at the use of cluster munitions “against civilian population” in eastern Ukraine.[9] However, it did not acknowledge or take any measures to address the use of cluster munitions by Russian-backed armed opposition groups in eastern Ukraine (see Use section below).

Russia has not condemned the use of cluster munitions in Syria or Yemen. However, it voted in favor of a 2015 UN Security Council (UNSC) resolution that expressed concern at evidence of cluster munition use in Darfur, Sudan.[10] Russia also voted in favor of a 2014 UNSC resolution that expressed concern at the “indiscriminate” use of cluster munitions in South Sudan.[11]

Russia is not party to the Mine Ban Treaty.

Russia is party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) and, after opposing CCW discussions on cluster munitions for years, changed its position in 2011 to support an effort led by the United States (US) to conclude a new CCW protocol on cluster munitions.[12] That initiative failed in November 2011, which ended CCW deliberations on cluster munitions, leaving the Convention on Cluster Munitions as the sole international instrument specifically dedicated to ending the suffering caused by these weapons. Since 2011, Russia has not proposed any more CCW work on cluster munitions.

Development and production

Russia, and historically the Soviet Union, is a major producer and exporter of cluster munitions. Additionally, several states inherited stocks of cluster munitions when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, “Our records on the production, usage, and export of cluster munitions…are confidential and will not be publicized.”[13]

According to international technical reference materials and corporate marketing, three state-owned Russian companies have produced cluster munitions:

  • Bazalt State Research and Production Enterprise (air-dropped bombs);
  • Mechanical Engineering Research Institute (120mm, 152mm, and 203mm artillery projectiles); and
  • Splav State Research and Production Enterprise Rocket (122mm, 220mm, and 300mm rockets).

Russia is continuing to develop new cluster munitions, but information on production is limited. In July 2020, Splav, which is part of state-owned arms company Rostec, displayed a new generation of multi-barrel rocket launchers at its refurbished rocket assembly facility in Tula, south of Moscow.[14] Photographs from the event show 9M55K 300mm cluster munition rockets and 9N235 fragmentation submunitions made for the Tornado-S system, a modernized version of the BM-30 Smerch rocket.[15]

In early 2018, Russia began testing the “Drel” RBK-500U guided cluster bomb developed by Bazalt State Research and Production Enterprise, according to the company.[16]

As of July 2021, there is no evidence that Russia has deployed either of these new cluster munitions.

Transfer

There is limited information available on Russian arms transfers, including cluster munitions. However, at least 35 states have stockpiled cluster munitions of Russian/Soviet origin, including 21 states not party to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[17]

At least 10 States Parties to the Convention on Cluster Munitions that have stockpiled cluster munitions of Russian/Soviet origin have formally declared the stocks, providing types and quantities, as listed in the following table:

Stockpiled Soviet/Russian cluster munitions declared by States Parties[18]

Type of cluster munition

Cluster munition

Submunition

States that declared stockpiles (quantity of cluster munitions)

Bomb

RBK-250 PTAB-2.5M

PTAB-2.5M

Bulgaria (488), Croatia (9), Cuba (663), Moldova (14), Hungary (17), Mozambique (199), Peru (657), Slovakia (20)

RBK-250-275 AO-1SCh

AO-1SCh

Bulgaria (238), Croatia (5), Cuba (282), Moldova (24), Côte d’Ivoire (68), Mozambique (9), Peru (388)

RBK-500 AO-2.5RT

AO2.5RT

Bulgaria (201), Moldova (16), Peru (198), Czech Republic (191), Slovakia (50)

RBK-500 ShOAB-0.5M

SHOAB-0.5M

Bulgaria (36)

RBK-500-255 PTAB-10.5

PTAB-10.5

Moldova (8), Slovakia (23)

RBK-500-255 PTAB-2.5

PTAB-2.5

Moldova (16)

RBK-500-355 AO-10

AO-10

Slovakia (22)

Dispenser

BKF AO-2.5RT

AO-2.5RT

Bulgaria (3,086), Cuba (336), Hungary (247), Slovakia (63)

BKF PTAB-2.5

PTAB-2.5

Bulgaria (1,957), Cuba (382), FYR Macedonia (1,438), Slovakia (72)

BKF PTAB-2.5KO

PTAB-2.5KO

Hungary (23)

Projectile

3-O-13

O-16

Moldova (834)

Missile

9N123K

9N24

Bulgaria (8)

Rocket

9M27K

9N210

Moldova (473)

Stockpiling

In 2009, Russia acknowledged that it possesses a “large” stockpile of cluster munitions “stored throughout the state” and said disposing of such a wide range of obsolete cluster munitions would be time-consuming and “a significant financial expenditure.”[19] In November 2011, Russia said its cluster munitions stockpile was similar in size to that of the US, which then reported stockpiling 5.5 million cluster munitions.[20]

According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, “The quantity and types of cluster munitions stockpiled in the Russian Ministry of Defence are confidential and will not be publicized.”[21] The following list of types stockpiled is based on a wide variety of publicly available sources.

Cluster munitions stockpiled by the Russian Federation[22]

Type

Caliber

Carrier name

Number of submunitions

Submunition type

Projectile

120mm

(unknown)

30

Dual-purpose

152mm

3-O-23

42

Dual-purpose

152mm

3-O-13

8

Dual-purpose

203mm

3-O-14

24

Fragmentation

240mm

3-O-8

14

Fragmentation

Dispenser

BKF ODS 35

8

FAE

BKF AO-2.5RT

96

Fragmentation

BKF PTAB-1M

248

HE/AT

BKF PTAB-2.5

96

HE/AT

Bomb

PROSAB-250

90

HE

RBK-250 PTAB-2.5M

42

HE/AT

RBK 250-275 AO-2.5RT

60

Fragmentation

RBK 250-275 AO-2.5RTM

60

Fragmentation

RBK 250-275 AO-1SCh

150

Fragmentation

RBK 250-275 PTAB 2.5M

30

HE/AT

RBK-500 AO-2.5RT

126

Fragmentation

RBK-500-255 PTAB-10.5A

30

HE/AT

RBK-500-375 AO-10

30

HE/AT

RBK-500 AO-2.5RTM

108

Fragmentation

RBK-500 PTAB-1M

268

HE/AT

RBK-500 PTAB 2.5

75

HE/AT

RBK-500 PTAB 2.5M

268

HE/AT

RBK-500 ShOAB-0.5

565

Fragmentation

RBK-500 SPBE

15

SFW

RBK-500 SPBE-D

15

SFW

RBK-500 SPBE-K

15

SFW

RBK-500 OFAB-50UD

10

Fragmentation

Rocket

122mm

Grad (9M218)

45

3-O-33 Dual-purpose

122mm

Grad (9M217)

2

SFW

220mm

Uragan (9M27K)

30

9N210 Fragmentation

220mm

Uragan (9M27K1)

30

9N235 Fragmentation

300mm

Smerch (9M55K)

72

9N235 Fragmentation

300mm

Smerch (9M55K1)

5

SFW

300mm

Smerch (9M55K5)

600

Dual-purpose

Missiles

9K52 Luna-M with 9N18K

42

9N22 Fragmentation

9M79 Tochka with 9N123K

50

9N24 Fragmentation

Note: FAE = fuel air explosive; HE/AT = high explosive antitank; SFW = sensor-fuzed weapon.

Use

Use in Syria

In Syria, there is strong evidence that Russia stockpiles cluster munitions at its airbase at Hmeymim, southeast of Latakia city, and that it is using cluster munitions or, at a minimum, directly participating together with Syrian government forces in attacks that have used cluster munitions on opposition-held areas of governorates.

Russian and Syrian government forces use many of the same aircraft and weapons and frequently carry out operations together.[23] There have been at least 687 cluster munition attacks in Syria since July 2012, including at least one attack between 1 August 2020 and 31 July 2021. Previously, Cluster Munition Monitor reported at least a dozen attacks using cluster munitions in Syria between August 2019 and July 2020.

There was a significant increase in the use of cluster munitions in Syria after Russia began its joint operation with Syrian government forces on 30 September 2015.[24] All except two types of the cluster munitions used in Syria since 2012 were manufactured by the Soviet Union/Russia.[25]

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has not explicitly denied Russia’s involvement in using cluster munitions in Syria, but has claimed that cluster munitions have been used in accordance with international humanitarian law and not indiscriminately.[26] In December 2016, Russia issued a three-page position paper on the use of cluster munitions in Syria that concluded that “the question of the involvement of the Russian military personnel in the cases of indiscriminate CMs [cluster munitions] use in Syria [is] totally inappropriate.”[27] In December 2015, the Russian Defense Ministry stated that “Russian aviation does not use [cluster munitions]” and that “there are no such munitions at the Russian air base in Syria.”[28]

The civilian harm caused by the use of cluster munitions in Syria has attracted widespread media coverage, public outcry, and condemnations from more than 145 states.[29]

In July 2019, research organization Conflict Intelligence Team identified an RBK-500 ShOAB-0.5 cluster bomb and RBK-500 AO-2.5RT cluster bomb on display at the Patriot Military Park in Moscow as part of an exhibition of weapons and military equipment used by Russia in its joint military operation in Syria.[30]

Previous use

In 2014–2015, Russian-backed insurgents used cluster munition rockets in eastern Ukraine.[31] Ukrainian government forces were also responsible for cluster munition rocket attacks.[32] Russia expressed concern at Ukrainian government use of cluster munitions, but never commented on cluster munition attacks by separatist forces.[33] There has been no evidence or allegations of new use of cluster munitions in eastern Ukraine by any party since a February 2015 ceasefire went into effect.[34]

During an August 2008 conflict with Georgia, Russia used cluster munitions including RBK-500 AO-2.5RTM cluster bombs and Uragan ground-fired rockets containing 9N210 and 9N235 submunitions. Russia used cluster munitions in or near nine towns and villages in the Gori-Tskhinvali corridor south of the South Ossetian administrative border.[35] Russia denied using cluster munitions in Georgia.[36]

Russian forces used cluster munitions in Chechnya from 1994–1996 and again in 1999.[37]

After the breakup of the Soviet Union, cluster munitions were also used by various forces in several conflicts in Azerbaijan, Nagorno-Karabakh, and Tajikistan. The extent of involvement of Russian forces in this use of cluster munitions is not known but cannot be discounted.

The Soviet Union used cluster munitions from 1979–1989 in Afghanistan. It first used cluster munitions in 1943 against German armed forces during World War II.[38]



[1] Human Rights Watch (HRW), “Letter to the Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov Regarding Cluster Munitions in Syria,” 10 August 2016; and “Russia’s Position on the Use of Cluster Munitions in Syria,” Position Paper annexed to letter to HRW, from Sergey Lavrov, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, 9 December 2016.

[2] Russia expressed “concern about the humanitarian impact of the arbitrary use of cluster munitions,” but called the convention “a very poor example of how to reach agreement on arms control” that “is a cynical attempt to repartition [sic] the market for cluster munitions.” “Statement of the Russian Federation,” UN General Assembly (UNGA) First Committee on Disarmament and International Security, New York, 20 October 2017.

[3] Statement of the Russian Federation, UNGA First Committee on Disarmament and International Security, New York, 6 November 2020.

[4] Russia attended a regional meeting held during the Oslo Process as an observer (in Brussels, Belgium in October 2007). For details on Russia’s policy and practice regarding cluster munitions through 2009, see HRW and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 230–235.

[5] “Russia explains refusal to join cluster bombs convention,” Interfax: Russia & CIS Military Newswire,8 December 2008. Similar language was used in a September 2009 letter to the Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC). See, letter from Sergey Ryabkov, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to the CMC, 18 September 2009. Unofficial translation by the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

[6] Russia participated as an observer in the convention’s Meetings of States Parties in 2010 and 2011.

[7]Implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” UNGA Resolution 75/62, 7 December 2020.

[8] Russia voted against the resolution in 2015–2017 and 2019, and abstained from the resolution in 2018.

[9] Statement of Russia, UNGA First Committee on Disarmament and International Security, 23 October 2014. The next day Russia told a UN Security Council (UNSC) debate on the situation in Ukraine that “there is an alarming and growing number of civilian victims, including children, as the result of…prohibited munitions, including cluster bombs.” Provisional report of the 7287th meeting of the UN Security Council, S/PV.7287, 24 October 2014.

[10] The five permanent members of the UN Security Council voted in favor of the resolution in addition to non-permanent members Angola, Chad, Chile, Jordan, Lithuania, Malaysia, New Zealand, Nigeria, Spain, and Venezuela.

[11] The resolution noted “with serious concern reports of the indiscriminate use of cluster munitions” and called for “all parties to refrain from similar such use in the future.” UNSC, “Security Council, Adopting Resolution 2155 (2014), Extends Mandate of Mission In South Sudan, Bolstering Its Strength to Quell Surging Violence,” SC11414, 27 May 2014.

[12] At the CCW’s Third Review Conference in 2006, Russia stated, “We cannot accept the logic of restrictions or even bans on ammunition artificially and groundlessly declared as the most ‘dangerous weapons.’ This path would lead us to a stalemate. It could only result in a split and weaken the [CCW] and its Protocols.” Statement by Anatoly I. Antonov, Director, Department for Security Affairs and Disarmament, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, CCW Third Review Conference, Geneva, 7 November 2006.

[13] Letter from Sergey Ryabkov, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to HRW, 20 March 2009.

[15] According to Rostec, President Vladimir Putin reportedly set an objective in 2016 for the company to use only Russian components in the modernized multi-launch rocket systems. See Rostec, “The New Rocket System Passes Official Tests,” 25 January 2017.

[16] Piotr Butowsky, “Russia set to finalise PBK-500U glide bomb evaluation,” Jane’s 360, 9 January 2018; and Michael Peck, “Cluster Bombs Are Back—and America and Russia Can’t Get Enough,” The National Interest, 21 April 2018.

[17] Russian or Soviet-era cluster munitions have been stockpiled by 11 States Parties to the convention (Bulgaria, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Czech Republic, Hungary, Iraq, Moldova, Mozambique, Peru, and Slovakia) and at least two dozen non-states parties (Algeria, Angola, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Georgia, India, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Libya, Mongolia, North Korea, Poland, Romania, Sudan, Syria, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and Yemen). See the relevant Cluster Munition Monitor ban policy country profile source for more information.

[18] All information in this table is taken from Article 7 reports submitted by States Parties to the Convention on Cluster Munitions. The reports for all States Parties can be accessed here: UN in Geneva, Article 7 Database.

[19] Statement of the Russian Federation, CCW Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 12 November 2009. Notes by Landmine Action.

[20] Statement of the Russian Federation, CCW Fourth Review Conference, Geneva, 18 November 2011. Notes by HRW. An October 2004 report to the US Congress by the US Department of Defense disclosed a stockpile of 5.5 million cluster munitions containing about 728.5 million submunitions.

[21] Letter from Sergey Ryabkov, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to HRW, 20 March 2009.

[22] The data in this table comes from the following sources: Publishing House “Arms and Technologies,” undated; Information Centre of Defence Technologies and Safety, “The XXI Century Encyclopedia, ‘Russia’s Arms and Technologies,’ Volume 12: Ordnance and Munitions,” CD Version, 2006; Robert Hewson, ed., Jane’s Air–Launched Weapons, Issue 44 (Surrey: Jane’s Information Group, 2004), pp. 414–415, and 422–432; Leland S. Ness and Anthony G. Williams, eds., Jane’s Ammunition Handbook 2007–2008 (Surrey: Jane’s Information Group, 2007), pp. 572, 597–598, 683, 703–706, 715–716, and 722–723; US Defense Intelligence Agency, “Improved Conventional Munitions and Selected Controlled-Fragmentation Munitions (Current and Projected),” partially declassified and made available to HRW under a Freedom of Information Act request; and “Russia’s Arms Catalog: Volume IV, Precision Guided Weapons and Ammunition, 1996–1997,” Military Parade: Moscow, 1997, pp. 138–139, 148–152, 373–392, 504, and 515–516. This research has been supplemented by information found on the Splav State Research and Production Enterprise corporate website.

[23] However, Russia is the only force in Syria to operate Sukhoi SU-25 and SU-34 fighter-ground attack jets used to deliver RBK-series cluster bombs. HRW, Amnesty International, and others have compiled credible evidence, including videos and photographs, documenting SU-25 and SU-34 jets near or involved in attacks near sites when cluster munitions were used. Amnesty International, “Syria: Russia’s shameful failure to acknowledge civilian killings,” 23 December 2015; and HRW, “Russia/Syria: Daily Cluster Munition Attacks,” 8 February 2016.

[24] See the Syria country profile. The Russian Ministry of Defense appeared to acknowledge responsibility for a June 2016 attack on coalition-backed armed opposition forces near the Syrian al-Tanf border crossing with Iraq, which the United Kingdom (UK) and US said used RBK-500 AO-2.5RT/RTM cluster munitions. Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, “On June 18 Russia and US held teleconference on implementing the Memorandum on preventing aerial incidents in Syria,” 19 June 2016. See also, The New Syrian Army (NSyA_Official), “Russians are lying with E-conference & more updates on our FB page. ‪#NSyA ‪#RuAF.’’ 19 June 2016, 13:18 UTC. Tweet (no longer accessible, as of August 2018).

[25] Cluster munition rockets manufactured in Egypt have also been used in Syria, while the Islamic State has used cluster munitions rockets of unknown origin containing a DPICM-type submunition called “ZP-39” in Syria. Soviet or Russian cluster munitions used in Syria include RBK-series cluster bombs containing AO-1SCh, AO-2.5RT, PTAB-2.5M, PTAB-2.5KO and ShOAB-0.5 submunitions; Smerch 9M55K and Uragan 9M27K-series surface-to-surface rockets containing 9N235 submunitions; and Tochka 9M79-series ballistic missiles. More advanced RBK-500 SPBE bombs containing SPBE sensor-fuzed submunitions and a ground-fired 240mm 3-O-8 rocket-assisted mortar projectile have been used in Syria since September 2015

[26]Russia’s Position on the Use of Cluster Munitions in Syria,” Position Paper annexed to letter to HRW from Sergey Lavrov, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, 9 December 2016.

[27]Russia’s Position on the Use of Cluster Munitions in Syria,” Position Paper annexed to letter to HRW from Sergey Lavrov, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, 9 December 2016. In the cover letter, Lavrov states, “I expect our paper to be taken into account during the preparation of future Human Rights Watch reports on the activities of the Russian military personnel in the fight against terrorism in Syria.”

[28] Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, “Russian Defence Ministry commented on briefing of Amnesty International,” 23 December 2015.

[29] More than 145 countries have condemned the use of cluster munitions in Syria via national statements and/or by endorsing resolutions or joint statements.

[30] Mark Krutov, “There is nothing to hide: Banned cluster bombs in Patriot Park,” Radio Liberty (translated from Russian), 26 July 2019.

[32] HRW, “Ukraine: Widespread Use of Cluster Munitions,” 20 October 2014.

[33] Statement of Russia, UNGA First Committee on Disarmament and International Security, 23 October 2014.

[34]Russia’s Position on the Use of Cluster Munitions in Syria,” Position Paper annexed to letter to HRW from Sergey Lavrov, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, 9 December 2016.

[36] Ibid.; see also, HRW and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 232–233.

[37] Mennonite Central Committee, “Clusters of Death: The Mennonite Central Committee Cluster Bomb Report,” July 2000, ch. 3.

[38] Mennonite Central Committee, “Drop Today, Kill Tomorrow: Cluster Munitions as Inhumane and Indiscriminate Weapons,” June 1999, p. 5.


Mine Ban Policy

Last updated: 17 November 2021

Policy

The Russian Federation has not acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty.

Russia has long expressed its opposition to the Mine Ban Treaty and appears to have toughened that stance in recent years. In November 2020, Russia told the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) that is it “not advisable for it to adhere” to the treaty and it has “serious doubts as to the reliability [of the treaty] as it does not have the necessary tools to ensure the compliance of those States that have violated it.” Russia said it “shares the goals of the treaty and supports a world free of mines,” but views antipersonnel mines “as an effective way of ensuring the security of Russia’s borders.”[1]

The position stands in stark contrast to a previous statement made by Russia at the UNGA in 2017: “We do not exclude our possible accession to Ottawa [Mine Ban] Convention in the future. In the meantime, Russia continues work to address a number of technical, organizational and financial issues related to implementation of Ottawa Convention.”[2]

Russia participated as an observer in the 1996–1997 process that created the Mine Ban Treaty, but did not adopt or sign the treaty. It attended the treaty’s First Meeting of States Parties in 1999 and the Second Review Conference in 2009 as an observer, but has not participated in any Mine Ban Treaty meetings since 2010.

In the past, Russia has said it cannot accede to the treaty as it sees military utility in antipersonnel mines and a lack of viable alternatives.[3] Russia has also indicated financial challenges in relation to the Mine Ban Treaty’s requirement to destroy stockpiled antipersonnel mines within four years.

Russia has consistently abstained from voting on the annual UNGA resolution promoting the universalization and full implementation of the Mine Ban Treaty. Russia abstained from the most recent vote in December 2020, on Resolution 75/52.

Russia is party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) and its Amended Protocol II on landmines.[4] It routinely submits national annual reports as required by Article 13. Russia is also party to CCW Protocol V on explosive remnants of war (ERW). Russia is not party to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

Russia has reported that in order to comply with CCW Amended Protocol II, a “National System of Technical Requirements for Landmines including antipersonnel and other than antipersonnel ones was elaborated and adopted; planned disposal of obsolete landmines is underway; new, more effective types of detection and demining tools are developed and commissioned. Marking of mine fields at the national boarder of the Russian Federation is fulfilled in full compliance with Paragraph 1 of the RF Federal Law #158FZ of December 7, 2004, ‘On Ratification of Amended Protocol II…’”[5]

Use

Since 1999, Russian forces have used antipersonnel landmines in Chechnya, but also at times in Dagestan, Tajikistan, and on the border with Georgia.[6] Russia has argued that its mine use has been necessary to stop the flow of weapons, drugs, and terrorists; and maintains that it has been in full compliance with CCW Amended Protocol II on landmines.[7]

In May 2020, the UN-recognized Government of National Accord (GNA) in Libya discovered significant mine contamination in areas of Tripoli vacated by opposition forces, including those from a Russian government-linked military company, the Wagner Group. The GNA claimed that antipersonnel landmines manufactured in the Soviet Union or Russia were “laid by the Wagner mercenaries” in the Ain Zara, Al-Khilla, Salahuddin, Sidra, and Wadi al-Rabi districts of Tripoli.[8]

In August 2021, the BBC published a report on the contents of an electronic tablet believed to have belonged to a fighter from the Wagner Group, which included maps of mined areas in Tripoli in 2020.[9] In mid-2020, clearance teams reportedly cleared more than 400 mines and other explosive devices from more than 200 homes in Tripoli’s southern enclave of Salahideen, which they said had been emplaced by the Russian mercenaries.[10]

In July 2020, the United States (US) military’s Africa Command (AFRICOM) criticized the “Wagner Group’s reckless use of landmines and booby traps,” which it said was “harming innocent civilians.”[11]

Production

Russia has produced at least 10 types of antipersonnel landmines since 1992, including blast mines (PMN, PMN-2, PMN-4, and PFM-1S) and fragmentation mines (POMZ-2, OZM-72, MON-50, MON-90, MON-100, and MON-200). Russia has stated on several occasions that its production of blast mines halted in 1997.[12] Russia has been conducting research on new mines, modifications to existing mines, and alternatives to mines since at least 1997.[13]

Russia debuted new “smart” landmine systems during its annual military exercises in 2021, including mines delivered by rockets and scattered from truck-mounted launchers.[14] It introduced the POM-3 or “Medalyon” antipersonnel mine—a self-destructing bounding fragmentation mine equipped with inherent antihandling/anti-disturbance capability—that had been in development since at least 2015.[15] Several types of self-destructing/self-deactivating antivehicle mines were also tested in 2021.[16] The status of Russia’s production plans for the POM-3 mine is not known.

Transfer

Since 1 December 1994, Russia has had a moratorium on the export of antipersonnel landmines that are not detectable or not equipped with self-destruct devices. The moratorium formally expired in 2002, yet Russian officials stated in June 2009 that it was still being observed.[17]

Antipersonnel landmines of Soviet/Russian origin have been found emplaced in at least 30 mine-affected countries.[18]

In recent years, antipersonnel mines of Russian manufacture—distinct from versions produced in the former Soviet Union—have appeared in Libya, Syria,[19] and Ukraine.[20]

Most recently, six types of Russian-made antipersonnel mines and two types of antivehicle mines, which had not been observed before in Libya, were used in and around Tripoli in 2019 and 2020, indicating that the mines were recently transferred into the country.[21] In March 2021, a report by the UN Security Council Panel of Experts on Libya found that private military contractors from Russia had imported the antipersonnel mines to use in their operations.[22]

Stockpiling and destruction

In November 2004, for the first time, Russia released official information on the number of antipersonnel mines in its stockpiles, when then-Minister of Defense Sergei Ivanov cited a figure of 26.5 million. He forecast that approximately 23.5 million of these antipersonnel mines would be destroyed between 2005 and 2015.[23] At the Mine Ban Treaty Tenth Meeting of States Parties in 2010, Russia declared that it had destroyed a total of 10 million mines, including antipersonnel mines.[24] In 2010 alone, more than 464,000 antipersonnel landmines that did not meet international requirements were destroyed.[25]

Russian officials have acknowledged that Russian military units in other countries within the Commonwealth of Independent States maintain antipersonnel landmine stockpiles; for example, 18,200 in Tajikistan, and an unknown number in Georgia (Abkhazia).[26]



[1] Russian Federation, Explanation of Vote on Resolution L.26, 75th Session, UNGA First Committee, New York, 6 November 2020.

[2] Statement of Vladimir Yermakov, Representative of the Russian Federation, UNGA First Committee, Debate on Conventional Weapons, New York, 20 October 2017. In December 2010, Russia said that it “did not exclude the possibility of joining the treaty in the future,” but that this required an incremental approach. Statement of Russia, Mine Ban Treaty Tenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 2 December 2010. Notes by ICBL. In June 2009, a Russian official said that Russia is committed to the objective of a mine-free world, but stressed that any prohibition must take into account national security considerations. According to the official, Russia’s accession to the Mine Ban Treaty is dependent on “solving a number of technical, financial and other tasks” related to implementation. Monitor interview with Ministry of Foreign Affairs official, Moscow, June 2009. These views were reiterated in an official letter in 2010. Letter from Sergey Ryabkov, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, 29 November 2010. Russia stated in November 2006 that “a mine-free world remains our common goal. Nonetheless, we have noted on several occasions that our movement towards this goal has to be realistic and gradual, sustaining the necessary level of security and stability.” Statement of Russia, CCW Amended Protocol II Eighth Annual Conference of States Parties, Geneva, 6 November 2006.

[3] Russia has often stated this in the past. A Russian diplomat has also asserted that Russia fully abides by the requirements of CCW Amended Protocol II. Interview with Georgy Todua, Minister Counsellor of the Russian Embassy in Colombia, Mine Ban Treaty Second Review Conference, Cartagena, 4 December 2009.

[4] Russia submitted a series of declarations with its ratification instrument that will guide its national implementation of CCW Amended Protocol II. For details of the declarations, see, ICBL, Landmine Monitor Report 2005: Toward a Mine-Free World (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, October 2005), pp. 854–855. Russia used Amended Protocol II’s optional nine-year extension to defer (until 3 December 2007) its compliance with the protocol’s technical requirements for self-destruct and self-deactivation mechanisms for remotely-delivered antipersonnel mines and detectability for antipersonnel mines.

[5] Russia CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report, Form C, 30 September 2009.

[6] For a summary of past use, see, ICBL, Landmine Monitor Report 2004: Toward a Mine-Free World (New York: Human Rights Watch, October 2004), pp. 1,186–1,187. Russia has denied any use of antipersonnel mines during the conflict in 2008 with Georgia over South Ossetia. Human Rights Watch (HRW) investigations could find no evidence of use of mines. See, ICBL, Landmine Monitor Report 2009: Toward a Mine-Free World (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, October 2009), p. 1,069.

[7] See, for example, statement by Amb. Anatoly I. Antonov, CCW Group of Governmental Experts, Sixth Session, Geneva, 18 November 2003.

[8] Photographs shared on social media show mines equipped with tripwires and mines used as triggers to detonate larger improvised explosive devices (IEDs). Video footage shows various explosive charges used to booby-trap homes, including antivehicle mines, paired with various types of fuzes and a mix of electronic timers, circuit boards, and modified cell phones. HRW, “Libya: Landmines Left After Armed Group Withdraws,” 3 June 2020.

[9] Nader Ibrahim and Ilya Barabanov, “The lost tablet and the secret documents: Clues pointing to a shadowy Russian army,” BBC News, 11 August 2021.

[10] Sudarsan Raghaven, “The Libyan war’s lethal legacy: booby-trapped teddy bears, toilets, and soda cans,” The Washington Post, 28 May 2021.

[11] Samy Magdy, “US Africa Command: Russian mercenaries planted land mines in Libya,” Associated Press, 15 July 2020.

[12] See, for example, Statement of Russia, CCW Amended Protocol II Tenth Annual Conference of States Parties, Geneva, 12 November 2008.

[13] In 2004, Russia said that it had spent or planned to spend RUB3.33 billion (US$115.62 million) on research, development, and production of new engineer munitions, including alternatives to antipersonnel mines. Statement by Sergei Ivanov, Minister of Defense, parliamentary hearings on ratification of Amended Protocol II, 23 November 2004. Average exchange rate for 2004: RUB1=US$0.03472. Oanda.

[14] Roman Kretsul and Anna Cherepanova, “Fire and ‘Tick’: Russia tested a new system of minefields,” Izvestia, 6 September 2021.

[15] In 2015, the POM-3 mine’s design engineers claimed that the seismically-activated POM-3 would be able to distinguish between combatants and civilians as it is activated by a sensor that detects the footfall of an individual, characterizes it against known signatures, and fires its warhead into the air. Directors Igor Smirnov and Mikhail Zhukov of the Scientific Research Institute of Engineering’s Department of Munitions, Mining, and Demining, interviewed on Zvezda TV, 20 November 2015, cited in “Russia Develops Landmine With ‘Electronic Brain’,” Defense World, 20 November 2015. See also, “Perspective Anti-Personnel Mine POM-3 ‘Medallion’,” Military Review, 30 November 2015.

[16] Landmine delivery systems Zemledeliye and UMZ-K Klesh-G, as well as antivehicle mine PTKM-1R. See, Lee, Rob (RALee85), “UMZ-K Klesh-G and Zemledeliye minelayers at the Mulino training area.” 31 July 2021, 21:53 UTC. Tweet. See also, Roman Kretsul and Anna Cherepanova “Fire and ‘Tick’: Russia tested a new system of minefields,” Izvestia, 6 September 2021.

[17] Monitor interview with Ministry of Foreign Affairs official, Moscow, June 2009.

[18] Countries in which Soviet/Russian antipersonnel mines have been found: Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Cambodia, Cuba, Cyprus, Ecuador, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Georgia, Honduras, Iraq, Lao PDR, Lebanon, Libya, Mozambique, Namibia, Nicaragua, Rwanda, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tajikistan, Thailand, Ukraine, Vietnam, Yemen, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.

[19] Since 2012, the Syrian Army has used landmines of Soviet/Russian origin, including PMN-2 and PMN-4 antipersonnel mines, and TMN-46 and TM-62 antivehicle mines, along its borders with Lebanon and Turkey. HRW, “Syria: Army Planting Banned Landmines: Witnesses Describe Troops Placing Mines Near Turkey, Lebanon Borders,” 13 March 2012.

[20] Since 2014, antipersonnel mines produced in Russia but never stockpiled in Ukraine have been spotted in visual media reports and reported as being seized by Ukrainian authorities. For example, in a video produced by a pro-rebel media source in July 2014, combatants associated with the Russian-supported Zarya Battalion were shown emplacing a PMN-4 antipersonnel mine, in conjunction with emplacing TM-62M antivehicle mines at an unknown location in eastern Ukraine. This type of mine has never been declared to be stockpiled by Ukraine and was only first publicly displayed by Russia in 1993. See, “Life of Zarya battalion,” YouTube.com, July 2014; and “Anti-personnel mine PMN-4,” Saper, undated.

[21] Antipersonnel mines: MON-50, MON-90, OZM-72, POM-2, POM-2R, and PMN-2; Antivehicle mines: TM-62M and TM-83. See, Berkowitz, Oded (Oded121351), “#Libya-#GNU photos of ERW (~ 9 tons) from the #Tripoli campaign that were recently removed from the south of the city. Note the North Korean PG-7 shells (F-7 HE) and extensive mint condition mines used by #Russia|n PMC, including MON-50, MON-90, PMN-2 & OZM-72 with older PRB M3.” 5 September 2021, 09:54 UTC. Tweet.

[23] Statement by Sergei Ivanov, Parliamentary Hearings on Ratification of CCW Amended Protocol II, 23 November 2004. Ivanov said that in 2000, Russia stockpiled 46 million antipersonnel landmines, but had since destroyed or disposed of around 19.5 million of them.

[24] Statement of Russia, Mine Ban Treaty Tenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 2 December 2010. Notes by ICBL.

[25] Russia CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report, Form B, 1 March 2011.

[26] In each of its Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 reports since 2003, Tajikistan has reported that intergovernmental talks are “currently underway” to clarify and complete data collection regarding these Russian mines.


Mine Action

Last updated: 19 November 2018

 

Treaty status

Mine Ban Treaty

Not a party

Mine action management

National mine action management actors

None

Mine action strategic plan

None

Operators in 2017

Federal Ministry of Defense engineers

Demining brigades of the Ministry of Internal Affairs

The Ministry of Emergency Situations (MES), through its specialized demining units (EMERCOM Demining and the “Leader” Center for Special Tasks)

An International Demining Action Center conducts specialist training

Extent of contamination as of end 2017

Landmines

Not known

Cluster munition remnants

None

Land release in 2017

ERW

331,607 explosive devices destroyed, including 30,292 improvised explosive devices (IEDs)

Progress

Landmines

Russia is continuing to demine in Chechnya and Ingushetia, but the extent of progress being made and the expected completion date are not known, as this information is not officially reported by Russia

 

Contamination

 

The Russian Federation is heavily contaminated with mines and explosive remnants of war (ERW) as a result of World War II, the two Chechen wars (1994–1996 and 1999–2009), and armed conflicts in the Caucasian republics of Dagestan, Ingushetia, and Kabardino-Balkaria.

Antipersonnel and antivehicle mines were used extensively in the two major conflicts in Chechnya. Estimates of the extent of contamination vary greatly because no systematic effort has been undertaken to assess the scope or impact of the problem.[1] In 2010, Russia’s deputy prime minister and presidential special envoy to the Caucasus, Aleksandr Khloponin, claimed that mines affected 14km2 of land and posed a major obstacle to development.[2] In contrast, Chechen officials and human rights organizations have previously estimated that 245km2 of land was mined, including 165km2 of farmland and 73km2 of woodland.[3]

In January 2017, a commander in the Russian armed forces reportedly told press agency Interfax that more than 100km2 of land remained to be cleared in Chechnya, and a further 20km2 in neighboring Ingushetia.[4] According to the online media report, areas cleared to date had nearly all been in lowland Chechnya and remaining mined area is in more mountainous terrain, complicating demining efforts.[5]

 

Program Management

 

There is no formal civilian mine action program in Russia and no national mine action authority. Mine clearance is carried out by Federal Ministry of Defense engineers, demining brigades of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and by the MES, through its specialized demining units (EMERCOM Demining and the “Leader” Center for Special Tasks).[6]

Russia reported that its armed forces established an International Demining Action Center in 2014. The center serves as a base for specialist training in detection and clearance of explosive devices, demining, and operation of mobile robotic tools, and does not function as a mine action center as the term is generally understood in mine action.[7]

Clearance of explosive ordnance in 2017 was reportedly undertaken by 7,050 military personnel, including 846 officers, 97 demining teams, 978 vehicles, and 51 pieces of demining machinery.[8]

 

Land Release

 

In its Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) Protocol V transparency reports for 2017, Russia reported that its armed forces engineering units conducted demining and explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) in the “territories of the Russian Federation,” including the western, southern, central, and eastern military districts, and the northern navy district.In total, more than 331,607 explosive devices were destroyed, including 30,292 IEDs.[9]

In 2016, the Deputy Chief Engineer of Russia’s armed forces, Colonel Ruslan Alahverdiev, had reportedly promised to complete clearance of Chechnya and Ingushetia by 2018.[10] However, in the online media report, it was unclear whether Colonel Alahverdiev was referring only to clearing all roads and forests, or if roads and forests are the only remaining mined areas in Chechnya and Ingushetia. In September 2017, online media reported that combat engineers had been working since April 2017 to clear forests in mountainous areas and foothills in Chechnya.[11]

 

Progress in 2018

 

For 2018, Russia planned to clear more than 53km2 of ERW: 14.7km2 in the western military district, 14.2km2 in the southern military district, 13.9km2 in the central military district, 6.2km2 in the eastern military district, and 4.1km2 in the northern navy district.[12]

 

 

 

The Monitor acknowledges the contributions of the Mine Action Review (www.mineactionreview.org), which has conducted the primary mine action research in 2018 and shared all its country-level landmine reports (from “Clearing the Mines 2018”) and country-level cluster munition reports (from “Clearing Cluster Munition Remnants 2018”) with the Monitor. The Monitor is responsible for the findings presented online and in its print publications.



[1] UNMAS, “Portfolio of Mine Action Projects 2009,” New York, 2008, p. 284.

[3]MoE sappers to demine arable land in Chechnya,” Caucasian Knot, 3 April 2009; “In Chechnya MES deminers destroyed 25 explosive devices,” Caucasian Knot, 5 October 2009; and “Human rights activists: 25,000 hectares of Chechen territory are still mined,” Caucasian Knot, 7 May 2008.

[4]Landmine threat in Chechnya still prevalent,” OC Media, 23 January 2017.

[5] Ibid.

[6] See, for example, “It is planned to establish special groups for demining of lands within MES,” Caucasian Knot, 23 July 2009; and “Autumn demining is completed in Chechnya,” Vesti Kavkaza, 28 October 2009.

[7] CCW Protocol V Article 10 Report, Form B, 31 March 2015; and meeting with Andrey Grebenshchikov, First Secretary, Department for Nonproliferation and Arms Control, Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in Geneva, 9 April 2015.

[8] CCW Protocol V Article 10 Report (for 2017), Form A.

[9] CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report (for 2016), Form B; and Protocol V Article 10 Report (for 2016), Form A.

[11]MfE's combat engineers defuse two air bombs in Chechnya,” Caucasian Knot, 22 September 2017.

[12] CCW Protocol V Article 10 Report (for 2017), Form A.


Casualties

Last updated: 23 January 2018

Casualties Overview

All known casualties by end 2016

3,187 civilian mine/explosive remnants of war (ERW) casualties (746 killed; 2,440 injured; 1 unknown)

Casualties in 2016

4 (2015: 14)

2016 casualties by outcome

3 killed; 1 injured (2015: 7 killed; 7 injured)

2016 casualties by device type

2 other ERW; 2 unknown mine/ERW type

 

In 2016, four mine/ERW casualties were identified in the Russian Federation through Monitor media scanning. All recorded casualties in 2016 were adult male civilians. No child casualties were recorded among civilians.[1]

The total number of mine/ERW casualties throughout Russia remains unknown.

A total of 3,187 civilian mine/ERW casualties (746 killed; 2,440 injured; 1 unknown) have been recorded since 1994, including in UNICEF data for casualties in Chechnya.[2]

Cluster munitions were reported to have caused at least 638 casualties; 612 of the casualties occurred during strikes in Chechnya (294 killed; 318 injured) in the period from 1994 to the end of 1999. The other 26 casualties were caused by unexploded submunitions and were reported between 1994 and the end of 2007.[3]



[1] Monitor media monitoring from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016.

[2] Monitor annual media monitoring since 2011; and email from Eliza Murtazaeva, UNICEF, 2 May 2011.

[3] Handicap International (HI), Circle of Impact: The Fatal Footprint of Cluster Munitions on People and Communities (Brussels: HI, May 2007), p. 85; and ICBL, Landmine Monitor Report 2007: Toward a Mine-Free World (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, 2007).


Casualties and Victim Assistance

Last updated: 17 September 2014

Casualties

Casualties Overview

All known casualties by end 2013

3,169 civilian mine/ERW casualties (736 killed; 2,432 injured; 1 unknown)

Casualties in 2013

25 (2012: 23)

2013 casualties by outcome

7 killed; 17 injured; 1 unknown (2012: 2 killed; 21 injured)

2013 casualties by device type

17 undefined mines; 7 other ERW; 1 unknown device

In 2013, 25 mine/explosive remnants of war (ERW) casualties were identified in the Russian Federation through Monitor media scanning. All recorded casualties in 2013 were male. The great majority (23) were military or police security personnel. No child casualties were recorded among civilians. All casualties took place in either Chechnya (16) or Ingushetia (nine).

The total number of mine/ERW casualties throughout Russia remains unknown. Casualties from explosives, particularly those involving improvised explosive devices (IEDs), have occurred regularly in Russia due to insurgent use in the North Caucasus and criminal activities throughout the country. Most reported incidents were clearly caused by command-detonated devices. However, in many cases, the types of explosive items involved could not be identified.

Casualty reporting in Chechnya over time has been more consistent than the rest of the Russian Federation. However, in 2010 the NGO Voice of the Mountains (Laman Az, VoM), which had been supported by UNICEF, ceased its active surveillance of explosive incidents due to a lack of funding.[1]

Under an agreement signed in early 2012 between the ICRC and the Russian Red Cross, the VoM casualty database served as the basis for tracking mine/ERW survivors. Members of the Chechen branch of the Russian Red Cross were subsequently trained to collect and manage data on mine incidents and the needs of the survivors. As of end of 2013, some 1000 mine/ERW casualties had been visited and their data has been collected. The database is managed by the Russian Red Cross Chechen branch coordinator with the assistance of the ICRC.[2]

As of the end of 2013, there were at least 3,169 civilian mine/ERW casualties (736 killed; 2,432 injured; 1 unknown), including 783 children, since 1994. UNICEF data demonstrated a steady decline in annual casualties in Chechnya from a peak of 713 in the year 2000.[3]

Cluster munitions were reported to have caused at least 638 casualties; 612 of the casualties occurred during strikes in Chechnya (294 killed; 318 injured) in the period from 1994 to the end of 1999. The other 26 casualties were caused by unexploded submunitions and were reported between 1994 and the end of 2007.[4]

Victim Assistance

The total number of mine/ERW survivors is not known, but is in the thousands. Most mine survivors in the Russian Federation are war veterans from the conflicts in Afghanistan, Chechnya, and the South Caucasus, or are civilian casualties in Chechnya. At least 2,414 civilians have been injured by mines/ERW in Chechnya since 1994.[5]

There is no victim assistance coordination in Russia, specifically not in Chechnya which is the most mine/ERW-affected area. The Ministry of Health and Social Development is responsible for programs and benefits for persons with disabilities.

 In 2013, the ICRC and the Russian Red Cross continued to identify and collect data on the needs of mine/ERW survivors with a view to facilitate support of survivors in Chechnya in cooperation with the ICRC, national authorities, or other international and national organizations.[6]

In 2013, the ICRC continued to provide micro-economic grants to support income generating projects, based on data collected under the agreement between the ICRC and the Russian Red Cross. Throughout 2013, 126 mine/ERW survivors and their families in Chechnya received support through this program.[7]

Mine/ERW survivors in most of Russia are provided with the same services as other persons with disabilities or, in the case of military casualties, as disabled veterans from post-World War II conflicts.[8]

In 2013, the authorities took steps to enhance the availability and quality of emergency medical care in the Russian northern Caucasus regions. Physicians, nurses and ambulance workers bolstered their ability to treat those in need, including weapon-wounded or mine/ERW victims, through advanced training, several sessions of which were organized by a local training center supported by the ICRC.[9]

Numerous war veterans’ groups and associations of disabled war veterans in many regions of Russia advocated for improved benefits and implementation of legislation. They also provided services, including physical rehabilitation and social and economic reintegration activities.[10] Civilians with disabilities were entitled to free prostheses and mobility devices as well as free transportation to the place of treatment or rehabilitation in the available network of institutions.[11]

Several laws prohibit discrimination against persons with disabilities in employment, education, transportation, access to healthcare, and the provision of state services or guarantee their rights to equal treatment, but these laws were generally not enforced. Persons with disabilities continued to face discrimination and denial of equal access to education, employment, and social institutions. Legislation on the protection of persons with disabilities requires that buildings be made accessible to persons with disabilities, but the law was not enforced and in practice many buildings were not accessible. In March 2011, Russia adopted the State Program on Accessible Environment for 2011–2015 to provide access to services in healthcare, culture, transport, and information. During 2013, the program continued under the supervision of the newly formed Ministry of Labor and Social Development.[12]

Russia ratified the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on 25 September 2012.

 



[1] Email from Eliza Murtazaeva, Project Officer, Child Protection, UNICEF, 11 March 2012.

[2] Email from Herbi Elmazi, Regional Weapon Contamination Advisor, ICRC, 25 July 2014.

[3] Monitor media monitoring for 2011; and email from Eliza Murtazaeva, UNICEF, 2 May 2011.

[4] Handicap International (HI), Circle of Impact: The Fatal Footprint of Cluster Munitions on People and Communities (Brussels: HI, May 2007), p. 85; and ICBL, Landmine Monitor Report 2007: Toward a Mine-Free World (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, 2007).

[5] This includes the UNICEF cumulative total 1994–April 2011 and Monitor media scanning for 2011, 2012, and 2013.

[6] Emails from Herbi Elmazi, ICRC, 12 April 2013, and 25 July 2013.

[7] Ibid., 25 July 2014.

[8] See previous ICBL, “Country Profile: Russia.”

[9] ICRC, “Annual Report 2013,” Geneva, May 2014, p. 391.

[11] CCW Protocol V Article 10 Report, Form F, 22 March 2010.

[12] United States Department of State, “2013 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Russia,” Washington, DC, 27 February 2014; and Human Rights Watch, “Russia: Reform Domestic Laws on Disability Rights,” 4 May 2012.