Latvia

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

Last updated: 05 August 2015

Five-Year Summary: Non-signatory Latvia supports the convention’s objectives and states it is in de facto compliance with the convention’s provisions, but it has not taken any steps towards accession. Latvia has not participated in any meetings of the convention, but it has responded annually to CMC requests for updated information.

Latvia states that it has never used, produced, stockpiled, or transferred cluster munitions.

Policy

The Republic of Latvia has not acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

In a May 2015 letter to the Monitor, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs reiterated Latvia’s “firm support” for the convention’s objectives and said it “de-facto complies” with the convention’s provisions. Latvia again informed the Monitor that there had been “no changes” in its position on accession to the convention, which it stated “could be re-examined in the future.”[1]

Latvia has provided similar responses to the Monitor each year since 2010.[2]

Latvia is a party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW). It has not reviewed its policy on joining the Convention on Cluster Munitions since efforts to create a new CCW protocol on cluster munitions failed in 2011, leaving the ban convention as the sole international instrument on cluster munitions.

Latvia participated as an observer in a couple of meetings of the Oslo Process that created the convention, including the Dublin negotiations in May 2008 and the Oslo Signing Conference in December 2008.[3]

Latvia has not participated in any meetings of the Convention on Cluster Munitions. It was invited to, but did not attend, the convention’s Fifth Meeting of States Parties in San José, Costa Rica in September 2014.

Latvia voted in favor of two Human Rights Council resolutions in 2015 that condemned the use of cluster munitions in Syria, most recently on 2 July 2015.[4] It has also voted in favor of UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolutions condemning the use of cluster munitions in Syria, most recently Resolution 69/189 on 18 December 2014, which expressed “outrage” at the continued use.[5]

Latvia is a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty. It is also a party to the CCW.

Use, production, transfer, and stockpiling

Latvia has stated several times that it has never used, produced, stockpiled, or transferred cluster munitions.[6] Latvia first informed the Monitor in July 2013 that it is in de facto compliance with the provisions of the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[7]



[1] Letter No. 32/202-2010 to Mary Wareham, Human Rights Watch (HRW), from Baiba Braže, Ambassador, Director-General of Security Policy and International Organisations Directorate, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 11 May 2015. According to the letter, Latvia is not considering submitting a voluntary Article 7 transparency report for the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

[2] Emails from Martins Pundors, Head of Arms Control Division, Security Policy Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 19 May 2014 and 30 July 2013; Letter No. 32/63-1434 from Baiba Braže, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 11 April 2012; email from Ieva Jirgensone, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 14 April 2011; and Letter No. 32/112-1697 from Kaspars Ozolins, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 23 April 2010.

[3] For details on Latvia’s cluster munition policy and practice through early 2010, see ICBL, Cluster Munition Monitor 2010 (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, October 2010), pp. 225–226.

[4] See, “The grave and deteriorating human rights and humanitarian situation in the Syrian Arab Republic,” Human Rights Council Resolution A/HRC/29/L.4, 2 July 2015; “The continuing grave deterioration in the human rights and humanitarian situation in the Syrian Arab Republic,” UN Human Rights Council Resolution A/HRC/RES/28/20, 27 March 2015; “The continuing grave deterioration in the human rights and humanitarian situation in the Syrian Arab Republic,” UN Human Rights Council Resolution A/HRC/RES/26/23, 27 June 2014; and “The continuing grave deterioration of the human rights and humanitarian situation in the Syrian Arab Republic,” UN Human Rights Council Resolution A/HRC/RES/25/23, 28 March 2014.

[5]Situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic,” UNGA Resolution A/RES/69/189, 18 December 2014. Latvia voted in favor of similar resolutions on 15 May and 18 December 2013.

[6] Letter No. 32/202-2010 from Baiba Braže, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to Mary Wareham, HRW, 11 May 2015; email from Martins Pundors, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 30 July 2013; Letter No. 32/112-1697 from Kaspars Ozolins, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 23 April 2010; and email from Ieva Jirgensone, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 14 April 2011.

[7] Emails from Martins Pundors, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 30 July 2013; and 19 May 2014.