Singapore

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

Last updated: 05 July 2016

Summary: Non-signatory Singapore has expressed support for the convention’s humanitarian objectives, but has not taken any steps towards accession. However, it voted in favor of a UN resolution on the convention in December 2015, which calls on states outside the convention to “join as soon as possible.” Singapore has participated as an observer in the convention’s meetings, including the First Review Conference in September 2015.

Singapore is not known to have used cluster munitions. In November 2015, Singapore’s only cluster munition producer, Singapore Technologies Engineering, announced that it has ceased production of the weapons. Singapore has not exported cluster munitions since it imposed a moratorium on exports in November 2008. Singapore possesses a stockpile of cluster munitions.

Policy

The Republic of Singapore has not acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

Singapore officials rarely comment on the government’s position on acceding to the convention. However, it elaborated its views in 2015, when it voted for a UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolution on the Convention on Cluster Munitions, which calls on states outside the convention to “join as soon as possible.”[1] The non-binding resolution was subsequently adopted by 140 countries, including many non-signatories.

According to a UN summary of the statements, Singapore said it voted for the resolution and for a similar one the Mine Ban Treaty because it supports “all initiatives against the indiscriminate use of anti-personnel landmines and cluster munitions, especially when they are directed at innocent and defenceless civilians.”[2] The representative said that Singapore supports “international efforts to resolve the humanitarian concerns” with these weapons and committed to “work with members of the international community towards finding a durable and truly global solution.”

Singapore said it does not view accession to the Convention on Cluster and/or Mine Ban Treaty as part of that solution because:

Singapore firmly believes that the legitimate security concerns and the right to self-defence of any State cannot be disregarded. A blanket ban on all types of anti-personnel landmines and cluster munitions may therefore be counter-productive.[3]

Singapore also noted its indefinite moratorium on the export of cluster munitions adopted in November 2008 and its participation as an observer in the work of the convention.

This was Singapore’s first comment on the convention since a May 2010 letter to the Monitor that said: “Singapore believes that humanitarian concerns pertaining to anti-personnel mines and cluster munitions should be balanced against the legitimate right of States to use such munitions judiciously for self-defence…We will continue to support international efforts to resolve the humanitarian concerns over anti-personnel mines and cluster munitions, and to work with members of the international community towards a durable and truly global solution.”[4]

Singapore did not participate in any of the preparatory meetings of the Oslo Process but attended the Dublin negotiations of the Convention on Cluster Munitions as an observer in May 2008.[5] Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed concern in 2009 at the way the convention was “negotiated outside of the United Nations framework.”[6]

Singapore participated as an observer in the convention’s First Review Conference in Dubrovnik, Croatia in September 2015. It has attended every Meeting of States Parties of the convention as well as intersessional meetings in Geneva in 2011. Singapore did not make any statements at these meetings.

Singapore is not party to the Mine Ban Treaty or the Convention on Conventional Weapons.

Use, production, transfer, and stockpiling

Singapore is not known to have used cluster munitions, but it produced and stockpiles the weapons.

An indefinite moratorium on the export of cluster munitions has been in effect since November 2008, when Singapore announced it would not be signing the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[7] In September 2015, a representative of Singapore confirmed to the Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC) that Singapore’s indefinite moratorium on the export of cluster munitions has not changed and still remains in effect.[8]

Prior to the 2008 export moratorium, cluster munitions were publicly advertised for sale by companies in Singapore, but it is not known if exports actually occurred.

In November 2015, Singapore Technologies Engineering announced that it has ceased production of cluster munitions. It published the decision on its website in a section entitled “Sustainability Governance” that states: “As a responsible military technology manufacturer we do not design, produce and sell anti-personnel mines and cluster munitions and any related key components.”[9]

In a letter to PAX, which leads the explosive investments disinvestment campaign for the CMC, the company’s president, Tan Pheng Hock, stated: “we often get asked by the investment community [about] our stand on cluster munitions,” and continued, “ST Engineering is now no longer in the business of designing, producing and selling of anti-personnel mines and cluster munitions or any related key components.”[10]

According to Jane’s Information Group, a subsidiary of Singapore Technologies Engineering, produced 155mm dual-purpose improved conventional munition (DPICM) artillery projectiles, each containing 64 submunitions equipped with electro-mechanical self-destruct fuzes.[11] The company also produced a 120mm mortar bomb that delivers 25 DPICM submunitions.[12]

Prior to the 2015 announcement, the company last communicated with the Monitor in May 2010, when it stated that it “does not produce cluster munitions for export, nor are we a sub-contractor to anyone who does.”[13]

Singapore has not disclosed information on the types or quantities on its stockpile of cluster munitions, which likely contains the 155mm projectiles and 120mm mortar bombs, as well as 350 CBU-71 air-delivered cluster bombs that Singapore received from the US at some point between 1970 and 1995.[14]



[1]Implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” UNGA Resolution 70/54, 7 December 2015.

[2] UN, “Speakers in First Committee Decry Destructive Force of Indiscriminate Weapons While Some Defend Need for National Protection, Approving 11 More Drafts,” GA/DIS/3540, 4 November 2015; and UN, “Record of First Committee 24th meeting,” A/C.1/70/PV.24, 4 November 2015.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Letter from Seah Seow Chen, Second Secretary, Permanent Mission of Singapore to the UN in Geneva, 4 May 2010. The Permanent Mission of Singapore to the UN in Geneva informed the Monitor in April 2013 and March 2012 that there has been no change to the position outlined in the May 2010 letter. Letter from Cheryl Lee, First Secretary, Permanent Mission of Singapore to the UN in Geneva, 10 April 2013; and letter from Seah Seow Chen, First Secretary, Permanent Mission of Singapore to the UN in Geneva, 13 March 2012.

[5] For details on Singapore’s cluster munition policy and practice through early 2009, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 238–239.

[7] In May 2010, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs official informed the Monitor that the indefinite export moratorium was undertaken “to ensure that these munitions will not be transferred to other parties who might use them indiscriminately and irresponsibly.”

[8] CMC campaign meeting with Maj. Yock Liang Vernon Goh, Singapore Armed Forces, Dubrovnik, 7 September 2015. Notes by CMC.

[9] See the Singapore Technologies Engineering website. See also: Stop Explosive Investments, “Singapore Technologies Engineering stops production of cluster munitions,” 18 November 2015. Investors received similar letters; and Local Authority Pension Fund Forum, “ST Engineering Quits Cluster Munitions,” 18 November 2015.

[10] Letter to PAX from Tan Pheng Hock, President and Chief Executive Officer, Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd, 11 November 2015.

[11] Leland S. Ness and Anthony G. Williams, eds., Jane’s Ammunition Handbook 2007–2008 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2007), pp. 657–658. The submunitions have an advertised failure rate of less than 3%.

[12] Singapore Technologies Engineering, “Product: 155m Cargo Round,” undated.

[13] Email from Sharolyn Choy, Senior Vice-President, Corporate Communications, Singapore Technologies Engineering, 3 May 2010.

[14] US Defense Security Assistance Agency, Department of Defense, “Cluster Bomb Exports under FMS, FY1970–FY1995,” 15 November 1995, obtained by Human Rights Watch in a Freedom of Information Act request.


Mine Ban Policy

Last updated: 25 October 2011

Mine ban policy overview

Mine Ban Treaty status

Not a State Party

Pro-mine ban UNGA voting record

Voted in favor of Resolution 65/48 in December 2010, as in previous years

Participation in Mine Ban Treaty meetings

Attended as an observer the Tenth Meeting of States Parties in Geneva in December 2010, but not the intersessional meetings in June 2011

Policy

The Republic of Singapore has not acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty. In May 2010, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs wrote the Monitor that “Singapore believes that humanitarian concerns pertaining to antipersonnel mines…should be balanced against the legitimate right of States to use such munitions judiciously for self defence…. We will continue to support international efforts to resolve the humanitarian concerns over antipersonnel landmines…and to work with members of the international community towards a durable and truly global solution.”[1]

In 8 December 2010, Singapore voted in favor of UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 65/48, calling for the universalization and full implementation of the Mine Ban Treaty, as it has in previous years. At the same time, it asserted, “Singapore firmly states that the legitimate security concerns and the right to self-defence of any state cannot be disregarded. A blanket ban on all types of anti-personnel landmines might therefore be counter-productive.”[2]

In 2010, the ICBL asked political parties in Singapore to share their views on the Mine Ban Treaty. Two had responded as of May 2010. The Singapore Democratic Party said that it supports a complete ban on the manufacture and use of mines and expressed its concern over Singapore’s role in mine production. It urged the Singapore government to join the treaty.[3] The Singapore Workers’ Party said that while it shares the humanitarian concerns surrounding the use of mines, and had asked the Minister of Defense about joining the treaty,[4] it would not be issuing any public statement due to other priorities.[5] In 2009 the Workers Party required a written reply in Parliament regarding the government’s stand on the Mine Ban Treaty.[6]

Singapore sent an observer to the Tenth Meeting of States Parties in Geneva in December 2010, but did not make any statements.[7]

Singapore is not party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons.

Use, stockpiling, production, and transfer

A Singaporean official previously stated that the army only uses antipersonnel mines for training, but that it must retain the option to use mines for self-defense.[8] The Ministry of Defense has not replied to requests for further information about Singapore’s training program.

In March 2009, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs official restated that Singapore will not disclose any information regarding its stockpile of antipersonnel mines for defense and security reasons. The official stated that Singapore maintains stringent controls on its stockpile management system and that all mines are destroyed after their expiration date.[9]

Singapore has long acknowledged that it produces antipersonnel mines, but officials have declined to reveal if production lines are currently running. Singapore Technologies Engineering (STE), through its subsidiary Singapore Technologies Kinetics, is the government-linked company that has produced antipersonnel mines.[10] In May 2010, when asked if it has halted production, STE told the Monitor that, “ST Engineering does not produce landmines and cluster munitions for export, nor are we a sub-contractor to anyone who does.”[11]

Singapore declared an indefinite moratorium on the export of all antipersonnel mines in February 1998. In May 2011, an official confirmed that the moratorium remains in place.[12]

 



[1] Letter from Seah Seow Chen, Second Secretary, Permanent Mission of Singapore to the UN, 3 May 2010. This echoes many previous statements by Singaporean officials.

[2] Statement of Singapore, “Singapore’s Explanation of Vote on Resolution L.39,” 65th Session, UNGA First Committee, New York, 17 October 2010. These remarks are identical to the explanation of vote offered in the previous four years.

[3] Email from Gandhi Ambalam, Chair, Singapore Democratic Party, 25 May 2010.

[4] In May 2009, Sylvia Lim Swee Lian, Chair of the Workers’ Party, asked the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defense whether Singapore is working toward acceding to the Mine Ban Treaty. Minister for Defense Teo Chee Hean replied with identical language to that used in other policy statements in recent years. Email from Sylvia Lim Swee Lian, Workers’ Party, 28 May 2010.

[5] Fax from Sylvia Lim Swee Lian, Workers’ Party, 3 May 2010.

[6] Email for Sylvia Lim Swee Lian, Workers’ Party, 28 May 2010. The statement was replied to by Teo Chee Hean, Deputy Prime Minister & Coordinating Minister for National Security & Minister for Home Affairs, whose reply echoed the Explanation of Vote at the UNGA. “Like several other countries, we believe that the humanitarian concerns pertaining to anti-personnel mines should be balanced against the legitimate security concerns of states.  While we maintain the right to use anti-personnel mines for self-defence, we also support any initiatives against the indiscriminate use of these mines, especially when they are used against innocent civilians.”

[7] An official told the Monitor in March 2009 that Singapore continues to attend Mine Ban Treaty-oriented meetings in order to keep abreast of international developments regarding mines and factor that into its policy considerations. Email from Sharon Seah, Assistant Director, International Organizations Directorate, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 31 March 2009.

[8] Interview with Lt.-Col. Koh Chuan Leong, Head, General Staff Branch, Singapore Army, in Geneva, 20 September 2006.

[9] Telephone interview with and email from Sharon Seah, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 30 March 2009.

[10] STE has produced two types of antipersonnel mines (VS-50 and VS-69) from designs by Italian companies. When asked about continuing use of Italian mine designs, the ambassador of Italy to Singapore noted that the Italian law banning antipersonnel mines is duly enforced only over Italian subjects and territory. Emails from Andrea de Felip, First Secretary and Deputy Head of Mission, Embassy of Italy in Singapore, 7 and 20 April 2010. It is not known if Italy has requested Singapore to halt use of the designs.

[11] Email from Sharolyn Choy, Senior Vice President, Corporate Communications, STE, 3 May 2010.

[12] Letter from Seah Seow Chen, First Secretary, Permanent Mission of Singapore to the UN, 9 May 2011.