Bosnia and Herzegovina

Mine Action

Last updated: 11 December 2017

Contaminated by: landmines (massive contamination), cluster munition remnants (medium contamination), and other unexploded ordnance (UXO).

Article 5 deadline: 1 March 2019
(Not on track to meet deadline)

Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 4 deadline: 1 March 2021
(Unclear whether on track to meet deadline)

Summary

Landmines: As of the end of 2016, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) reported 1,091km2 of antipersonnel mine contamination, of which 23.46km2 was confirmed.[1] In 2016, BiH released 1.34km2 by clearance and 10.39km2 by technical survey. A further 46.94km2 was reportedly canceled, though this result may not be for 2016 only, but for a period of three years.

Cluster munition remnants: As of the end of 2016, BiH had 1.12km2 of confirmed hazardous area (CHA) contaminated by cluster munition remnants and a further 7.3km2 of cluster munition suspected hazardous area (SHA). This is an increase on the reported 0.85km2 of CHA and 7.3km2 of SHA at the end of 2015. During 2016, 0.86km2 of land was released (0.1km2 through clearance and 0.76km2 through technical survey) with 632 submunitions destroyed, and 0.47km2 confirmed to be contaminated.

Recommendations for action

  • The Action Plan of the Demining Commission should be approved and implemented expeditiously.
  • BiH should strengthen its resource mobilization efforts through the regular resumption of the Board of Donor meetings.
  • BiH should finalize and implement the new mine action strategy for 2018–2025.
  • BiH should complete the process of amending the mine action law within the planned timeframe.
  • BiH should complete the revisions to standards and standard operating procedures within the planned timeframe.
  • The BiH Mine Action Center (BHMAC) should ensure it reports more accurately and consistently on land release data (disaggregated by method of release), as well as on contaminated areas.
  • BiH should accelerate clearance of cluster munition remnants to fulfil its Article 4 obligations as soon as possible, as required by the Convention on Cluster Munitions.
  • The demining capabilities of the BiH armed forces and the Federal Administration of Civil Protection should be enhanced by the provision of new equipment and training, and more conducive human resources policies.

Contamination

BiH is massively contaminated with mines and explosive remnants of war (ERW), including cluster munition remnants, primarily as a result of the 1992–1995 conflict related to the break-up of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.[2]

Mine contamination

Most mined areas are in the zone of separation between BiH’s two main political entities—the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH) and Republika Srpska (RS). Twenty years after the end of the conflict, BiH is still the most heavily mined country in Europe.

BiH has reported inconsistent figures for its estimate of mine contamination as of the end of 2016.[3] In its latest Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 transparency report, BiH states that a total of 1,091km2 of area was suspected to contain mines across 8,636 locations, of which it estimated that 315.75km2 of area was more likely to contain mines across 4,286 “locations.”[4] BiH’s statement on Article 5 implementation at the June 2017 Mine Ban Treaty intersessional meetings, however, only mentioned the 1,091km2 of suspected mined area (representing 2.2% of the total area of BiH), and does not reference the area within this total, which is estimated to contain mines.[5]

The BHMAC, in its “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016” and by email, reports that there are 1,091km2 of hazardous area which it reports as SHA, although it includes 23.46km2 of CHA, as presented in the table below.

Antipersonnel mine contamination by canton (as at end 2016)[6]

Canton

Hazardous Area

Area (km2)

CHAs

Area (km2)

Unsko-Sanki

587

106.33

134

2.80

Posavski

192

19.41

13

0.60

Tuzlanski

674

81.28

70

1.97

Zanicko-Dobojski

750

125.36

50

1.55

Bosansko-Podrinjski

281

50.69

22

0.95

Srednje-Bosanski

856

129.77

109

3.39

Hercegovacko-Neret

1,187

155.78

70

2.73

Zapadno-Hercegovacki

6

0.31

3

0.23

Sarajevo

290

74.25

42

1.13

Canton 10

584

88.83

35

1.0

Subtotal BiH Federation

5,407

832.01

548

16.35

Republika Srpska

3,093

242.99

325

6.89

Brčko district

138

16.23

6

0.22

Total

8,638

1,091.23

879

23.46

Note: The data reported on CHA is included within the overall hazardous area.

Whichever figures are correct, this represents a decrease in overall mined area, compared to the 300km2 of CHA and 1.15km2 of SHA as of the end of 2015, as reported by BiH in its Article 7 report the previous year,[7] or the 23.04km2 of CHA and 1,149km2 of SHA reported to by BHMAC for 2015.

BiH stated in its Article 7 report that 73,483 mines and items of UXO remain to be cleared.[8]

The number of “minefield” records was reported in 2016 to total 19,283, of which 13,672 were in the Federation of BiH, 4,858 in Republika Srpska, and 753 in Brčko District. Collection of minefield records is ongoing, with BHMAC estimating that it has collected around 70% of the total.[9] It is unclear to what extent the 19,283 minefield records include areas already released through survey and clearance operations that incorrectly remain in the database as mined areas.

A 2016 national audit office report on the efficiency of the demining system in BiH concluded that:

“Twenty years after the war ended, the Mine Action Centre still does not have complete information on the locations of landmines in BiH, which is to say it does not know the total suspected hazardous area.[10] Similarly, a 2015 UNDP evaluation reported that BHMAC is aware that not all of the SHA is actually mined, but “without more efficient non-technical survey and technical survey procedures the exact extent of the problem cannot be quantified.”[11]

BiH was severely affected by the Balkan flood disaster in May 2014, which reminded the international and local community of the task of mine clearance that still remains in BiH.[12] The European Union (EU)’s 2014 Flood Recovery Needs Assessment for BiH found that there to be minimal mine migration compared to that expected, and that mines and UXO remain a risk in human, economic, and social terms and should be addressed as a priority.[13] The EU Needs Assessment recommended that BHMAC consider the possibility that landslides may have buried landmines deeper than the 10cm to 20cm currently investigated in clearance efforts.[14] The assessment identified key priorities and tasks for mine action to aid the recovery.[15]

According to BiH, mined areas are located in 129 municipalities/cities, with 1,389 communities/populated areas contaminated. Mine and ERW contamination directly impacts the safety of approximately 545,000 people, or 15% of the population of BiH, based on the last census in 2013.[16] Of the total SHA, 62% is forested, 26% agricultural land, and 12% infrastructure.[17] Much of the remaining mine contamination in BiH is comprised of individually placed mines or groups of mines, which do not follow a set pattern, and which were emplaced across a wide area, posing a challenge to the identification of the location of contamination.[18] Furthermore, physical changes to mined areas, such as in vegetation, and a lack of witnesses to the laying of the mines, pose additional challenges.[19] Mine contamination is said also to obstruct the return of refugees and the displaced, impede rehabilitation and development of utility infrastructure, and prevent free movement between communities, especially on the administrative line between the entities.[20]

The fertile agricultural belt in the Posavina region, along with the Doboj region, has the most heavily contaminated areas.[21] According to BHMAC, however, most mine incidents now occur in forested areas.[22] In 2016, two incidents occurred in areas not declared or marked as contaminated, but such incidents are unusual in BiH.[23] (For further details, see BiH’s casualty profile.)

Cluster munition contamination

As at the end of 2016, BiH reported 23 areas covering a total of 1.12km2 confirmed to contain cluster munition remnants, while a further 207 areas totaling 7.30km2 were suspected to contain cluster munition remnants (see table below).[24] This compares to reported contamination, as of the end of 2015, of 25 CHAs covering 0.85km2 and 294 SHAs totaling an estimated 7.3km2.[25]

Cluster munition contamination as of the end of 2016[26]

Canton

CHAs

CHA (km2)

SHAs

SHA (km2)

Unsko-Sanski

4

0.25

29

0.21

Tuzlanski

3

0.09

31

0.84

Zenicko-Dobojski

4

0.14

46

2.31

Srednje-Bosanski

4

0.20

35

1.78

Zapadno-Hercegovacki

0

0

11

0.22

Sarajevo

2

0.07

9

0.38

Canton 10

4

0.25

24

0.43

Subtotal Federation BiH

21

1.00

185

6.17

Republika Srpska

2

0.12

22

1.13

Total

23

1.12

207

7.30

 

The contamination figures in the table above differ slightly from those in BiH’s latest Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 transparency report, which claimed 7.31km2 was the total of all contamination. No reference is made in BiH’s Article 7 report to the 1.12km2 of confirmed area reported separately by BHMAC.[27]

Of the total suspected cluster munition contamination, 2.7km2 is the result of individually launched KB-1 submunitions fired from modified AK-47 rifles.[28] BHMAC plans to undertake a survey to more accurately delineate areas containing this contamination, and will then produce an analysis of the findings.[29]

A total of 4.3km2 of contamination, including the 2.7km2 of contamination by KB-1 submunitions fired from rifles, is in areas which also contain mines.[30]

The difference in total cluster munition contamination between the end of 2015 and the end of 2016, both in terms of the number of CHA and SHA, and the overall area of contamination, cannot be explained or reconciled by area released by technical survey and clearance or the amount of land confirmed as contaminated by cluster munition remnants. No satisfactory explanation has been provided for the disparity in data between reporting periods.

Cluster munition contamination dates back to the conflicts of 1992–1995 related to the break-up of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.[31] A survey and initial general assessment of cluster munition contamination was jointly conducted by BHMAC and Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA) in 2011. Since technical survey and clearance operations began in 2012, and through the end of 2016, 5km2 of area was reduced or cleared, with 2,195 submunitions and 92 other ERW destroyed.[32]

Cluster munition contamination in BiH is a small humanitarian risk but has a greater impact on development, impeding access to natural resources and posing an obstacle to rehabilitation and building of infrastructure.[33] Sixty communities have been identified as affected with submunitions, of which 31 are also affected by mines.[34] In August 2016, a boy was injured by a KB-1 submunition while tending livestock in Sehovina, Mostar.[35] (See the Casualty profile for more details.)

Program Management

The Demining Commission, under the BiH Ministry of Civil Affairs, supervises the state-wide Bosnia and Herzegovina Mine Action Center (BHMAC) and represents BiH in its relations with the international community on mine-related issues.[36] The Demining Commission is composed of representatives from three ministries (Civil Affairs, Security, and Defense) elected from the three constituent “peoples” of BiH and representing BiH’s three majority ethnic groups (Bosniaks, Croats, and Serbs).[37] Three new Demining Commission members were given a two-year mandate on 23 July 2015,[38] which expired in July 2017. A new Demining Commission was expected to be appointed in the near future, and in the interim, the current representatives will serve as an acting Demining Commission.[39] Whereas the Minister for Civil Affairs remains ultimately responsible for mine action, the Demining Commission represents the strategic body responsible for setting mine action policy, and it proposes the appointment of BHMAC senior staff, for approval by the Council of Ministers.[40]

BHMAC is responsible for regulating mine action and implementing BiH’s demining plan, including accreditation of all mine action organizations.[41] BHMAC operates from its headquarters in Sarajevo, two main offices in Sarajevo and Banja Luka, and eight regional offices (Banja Luka, Bihac, Brčko, Mostar, Pale, Sarajevo, Travnik, and Tuzla).[42]

A November 2016 national audit office report on the efficiency of the demining system in BiH concluded that: “The institutions of BiH have not undertaken all activities required to ensure efficiency of the demining system. A conclusion can be drawn that BiH is not committed to dealing seriously with the demining problem, which jeopardises the implementation of the BiH strategic goals and the fulfilment of international commitments assumed. The demining process has neither been analysed nor improved systematically in the past 15 years.”[43] However, reforms are now being implemented, under the leadership of a new acting director of BHMAC, who was appointed on 22 September 2015 by the Council of Ministers.[44] The Demining Commission has drafted an Action Plan to address the recommendations of the 2016 audit office report, but as of September 2017 the status of the Action Plan was unclear.[45]

In its 2015 revision of the National Mine Action Strategy for 2009–2019, BHMAC stated that one of its goals was to “organize regular meetings for Board of Donors in order to present the results and to ensure and increase trust and support of donors.”[46] After a 10-year hiatus, Board of Donor meetings resumed in September 2015,[47] and a second meeting took place in March 2016.[48] As the Board of Donors is one of the few platforms where international actors meet formally under law, international donors in BiH welcomed the resumption of the meetings, which provide a forum for improved coordination and communication with the national authorities.[49] As of September 2017, however, no further Board of Donor meetings had taken place since the March 2016 meeting.[50]

In October 2016, expert working groups, which used to meet until 2009, were re-established.[51] According to BHMAC, the working groups will meet as often as needed.[52]

Strategic planning

As of October 2017, BiH was working on a new National Mine Action Strategy for 2018–2025, with support from the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD), which addresses all contamination, including antipersonnel mines.

The BiH Mine Action Strategy for 2009–2019, adopted by the Council of Ministers in 2008,[53] sets the target of the country becoming free of mines by 2019. BHMAC conducted the first of three planned revisions of the strategy in 2012–2013[54] (the other two were due in 2015 and 2017, respectively).[55] The 2012 revision asserted a lack of funding as one of the major reasons for BiH’s slow progress towards completion of its clearance goals.[56] The revised strategy was not formally adopted by the Council of Ministers.[57]

The second revision of the BiH Mine Action Strategy 2009–2019 was completed in 2015,[58] in consultation with the Demining Commission and the UNDP.[59] Among the strategic and operational goals in the revised strategy, was the elimination of one third of the total suspected mined area in BiH through non-technical and technical survey, by the end of 2019.[60] The operational plan in the 2015 revision also envisaged that over the next two or three years all organizations would transition to conform to the new land release methodology.[61] The revision was endorsed by the Demining Commission in BiH in March 2016, but was not adopted by the Council of Ministers.[62]

After starting the third revision process, BiH, with support from the GICHD, is now instead producing a new mine action strategy towards completing landmine and cluster munition clearance (2018–2025),[63] for which two consultative workshops were held in November 2016 and February 2017.

The new strategy will contain a plan and timeframe for the completion of mine and cluster munition clearance.[64] It will also include a section on management of residual contamination and national capacities, after clearance of all contaminated areas is completed.[65] Donors are hoping that the strategy will contain clear, realistic indicators and milestones, and incorporate up-to-date land release methodologies.[66] The Demining Commission and BHMAC will produce an action plan and financial plan for the strategy (2018–2025).[67] BHMAC has reported that it intends to factor at least two revisions into its new mine action strategy, to help monitor progress and ensure it remains valid.[68]

On 13 September 2017, the draft strategy was presented and discussed at a meeting of the BHMAC, the Demining Commission, the GICHD, and the UNDP. The draft strategy was then shared with the BiH Armed Forces, the entity Civil Protections, the UNDP, and the EU for further comment.[69] The strategy is due to be completed in October 2017, after which it will be referred to the Council of Ministers for adoption.[70]

Survey planning

In September 2017, a project proposal for a country-wide re-assessment (re-survey) was submitted to the EU for consideration.[71] The aim is to establish a more accurate baseline of mine contamination.[72] The proposed non-technical survey would include desk studies, analysis of war maps, and other materials, and would focus on finding evidence of mines, including analyzing evidence of cases in which mines have been removed by locals since the end of the conflict.[73] It is envisaged that the re-survey would take approximately two years and data obtained during the process will help inform periodic revisions to BHMAC’s completion plan.[74] The proposed re-assessment will also include components of impact assessment, as the initial survey results date back many years and there is the need to re-determine the current impact of mine contamination.[75] The re-survey would be implemented by BHMAC, NPA, and the BiH Armed Forces’ Demining Battalion.[76]

Mine action prioritization and planning in BiH is based on socio-economic impact. However, a UNDP evaluation recommended that the system be reviewed to reflect changing circumstances as well as to take account of the specific impact of particularly dangerous mines, such as the PROM-1.[77] BHMAC conducted a general assessment in 2016 to help designate high, medium, and low impact SHAs.[78]

Legislation

Since 2008, efforts have been made to adopt new mine action legislation in BiH with a view to creating a stable platform for mine action funding by the government and local authorities. A new draft demining law, which was first submitted to parliament in 2010, had still to be approved as of September 2017 by the Council of Ministers,[79] after which it must be sent for parliamentary approval. The last attempt to amend the law took place in the second half of 2015 and the draft Bill failed to attract the support of the Council of Ministers, which concluded that instead of adopting a new law, the existing law on demining should be amended.[80]

BiH demining authorities are following the recommendation to amend the existing law, but as such is restricted in the number of changes it can include, as amendments are not permitted to exceed 40% of an original act, otherwise a new law is needed.[81] In August 2016, the 68th session of the Council of Ministers of BiH issued a “Decision of the establishment of working group for the design of changes on the Demining law in BH.”[82] The working group, which consisted of representatives from the Ministry of Civil Affairs, the Demining Commission, BHMAC, the Armed Forces, and the entity Civil Protections, created the first draft of the amended demining law.[83] In December 2016, the Ministry of Civil Affairs of BiH opened a short 16-day public consultation process on Draft of Law on Amendments to the Law on Demining in BiH in accordance with the rules for consultations in drafting legal regulations in institutions of BiH.[84] As of June 2017, the draft law had been sent, via the Ministry of Civil Affairs, to the Council of Ministers for adoption.[85]

The UNDP has highlighted the need for the existing draft to be amended to ensure a strategic management body exists for mine action, that BiH national standards on land release are referenced, and that no technical issues impede land release.[86]

A BHMAC official acknowledged that the lack of a new legal framework has contributed to BiH’s repeated failure to meet its funding targets under its own mine action strategy.[87] Nevertheless, the UNDP’s 2015 evaluation stated that though a more robust legal framework for mine action in BiH would be welcome, the current demining law is adequate to enable mine action activities to be implemented effectively.[88]

Standards

In 2016, the Demining Commission formally adopted the three chapters of the national mine action standards (NMAS) on land release, non-technical survey, and technical survey.[89] They were drafted in cooperation with EU technical assistance through the Land Release pilot project, the UNDP, and the GICHD.[90] The Demining Commission adopted temporary guidelines for quality assurance (QA)/quality control (QC) for land release tasks in July 2017.[91]

In 2016, BHMAC also adopted a new standing operating procedure (SOP) for non-technical survey of areas suspected to contain cluster munition remnants, based on NPA’s own SOPs.[92] The Demining Commission subsequently adopted new standards for cluster munition remnants at the beginning of 2017.[93]

In 2016, in collaboration with the GICHD and the UNDP, BHMAC held a workshop on “standards and SOP revisions.”[94] BHMAC created four expert working groups in 2016, to work on amendments and additional to all the chapters of the national mine action standards and SOPs.[95] The working groups expected to complete their work by the end of September 2017, after which recommendations were to be sent to the demining commission for adoption.[96] NPA piloted SOPs for technical survey with targeted investigation.[97]

Operators

At the end of 2016, 26 organizations were accredited for mine action in BiH: four government organizations (Armed Forces of BiH, Federal Administration of Civil Protection, Civil Protection Administration of Republic of Srpska, and Brčko District Civil Protection), the Red Cross Society of BiH, nine commercial companies (eight national and one international), and 12 NGOs (10 national and two international).[98] Overall demining capacity totaled 1,200 persons in accredited organizations, comprising 900 deminers and 300 others (including team leaders, site leader, operational officers, QA officers, and dog trainers).[99]

During 2016, technical survey and/or clearance of antipersonnel mines was conducted by the BiH Armed Forces, the Federal Administration of Civil Protection, the Civil Protection Administration of Republic of Srpska, and 13 other clearance organizations, comprising nine NGOs (DEMIRA, Dok-ing deminiranje N.H.O., Eko Dem, Centre of Mine Detection Dogs (MDDC), NPA, Pazi Mine, Pro Vita, Stop Mines, and Association UEM) and four commercial organizations (Detektor, N&N Ivsa, Point, and UEM).[100]

The governmental operators—Civil Protection teams and the BiH Armed Forces’ Demining Battalion—constitute about 60% of the available operational capacity in BiH, though their total output in terms of land released by clearance and technical survey is proportionately much less.[101] The general view is that the BiH Armed Forces and Civil Protection are both good partners, and have effective capacities, but have suffered from logistical challenges and equipment deficits, which prevent them from working at full capacity.[102]

The BiH Armed Forces survey and clearance operations are fully engaged from March to November, and with reduced activity, predominantly in southern BiH, from December to February.[103] The BiH Armed Forces deploys machinery and explosive detection dogs during its survey and clearance operations.[104] They require ongoing support from external partners since the army’s own complex procurement system often cannot deliver such items in sufficient time.[105] Since 2010, NPA has increasingly focused on building the capacity of the Demining Battalion.[106] This involves transfer of knowledge through operational planning of clearance and technical survey operations; direct operational support; and provision of mine detection dogs (MDDs) and equipment, among other things.[107]

Furthermore, both the BiH Armed Forces and Civil Protection entities suffer recruitment challenges, but of a differing nature. Deminers in the BiH Armed Forces are forced to stop demining at the age of 38 (this upper limit, until recently, had been 35). This results in experienced deminers being forced to retire and, as a consequence, a high turnover of deminers.[108] The Federal Administration of Civil Protection on the other hand, is unable to employ new staff, including deminers, as this is a federal government decision. Therefore, the capacity of the Federal Administration of Civil Protection has been reduced as pensioned deminers or those absent due to sickness have not been replaced.[109]

Both machines and dogs are integrated into NPA demining operations in BiH. Machines are used for mechanical ground preparation, but much of the remaining mined area is in hilly or mountainous terrain, which restricts the use of machinery. MDD and special detection dogs (SDDs) are used for clearance and technical survey tasks, including targeted technical survey.[110] NPA also supports BHMAC with non-technical survey, and has one non-technical survey team seconded to BHMAC.[111] NPA further conducts mine clearance in the Srebrenica region in support of the activities of the International Commission for Missing Persons.[112]

Mines Advisory Group (MAG) received operational accreditation in April 2017, and began technical survey and clearance operations in May 2017.[113]

During 2016, four organizations conducted cluster munition technical survey and/or clearance: the BiH Armed Forces, the Federal Administration of Civil Protection, and NGOs NPA and Pro Vita.[114] In total, they comprised 174 operational staff and 61 searchers. In addition, BHMAC conducted non-technical survey with the support of one NPA team seconded to BHMAC.[115] This represented a similar overall capacity to 2015.[116] Four of the 34 BiH Armed Forces’ 10-strong demining teams (eight deminers, plus a team leader and a medic) are specialized for cluster munition clearance. However, as of May 2017, only two were deployed, due to a shortage of metal detectors for cluster munition detection.[117]

With the exception of MAG and NPA, clearance operators in BiH typically compete for international tenders in order to secure their funding. The UNDP evaluation suggested that this left much capacity underused and recommended alternative contracting models more appropriate for land release (either by having longer term contracts or being contracted for the clearance of larger areas), which could be more attractive to the demining organizations in terms of security and could also make best use of capacity in the long run.[118] National demining NGOs, such as STOP Mines or Pro Vita, which are registered in a similar way to companies, potentially have capacity to quickly mobilize additional resources and up-scale operations.[119]

Quality management

BHMAC’S two main offices in Banja Luka and Sarajevo coordinate the activities of regional offices in planning, survey, and QA/QC. QA inspectors are based in the regional offices.[120]

The 2015 UNDP evaluation found that BHMAC’s QA of demining activities functions well, but recommended that BHMAC develop effective quality management mechanisms for the whole organization to make processes more efficient and transparent.[121] However, the 2016 national audit office report found that the quality control of demining carried out by BHMAC is not efficient and that a systematic improvement of the QC process has never been done. In addition, the report states that: “Despite several levels of control in the demining system, accidents and irregularities occur in the areas the BiH Mine Action Centre declared safe.”[122] In the report, “accidents” refer to blasts during demining activities and in areas that have been cleared and released; and “incidents” refer to mines and items of UXO detected in cleared areas after the completion of works and after the QC certificates had been issued by BHMAC. According to the audit office report, 23 irregularities and 32 accidents occurred between 2005 and 2016. Of the 32 accidents, 29 occurred during demining while the remainder involved civilians after demining had been completed.[123] The director of BHMAC, however, reported in May 2017 that no irregularities or accidents on cleared/released land have occurred in the last two years.[124]

Five decisions requiring repetitions of technical survey operations were issued during clearance and technical survey operations in 2016, in addition to six withdrawals of authorization, and one resolution on prohibition of further work.[125]

Land Release (mines)

In 2016, BiH cleared 1.34km2 and reduced 10.39km2 through technical survey.[126] While clearance output dropped slightly compared to the 1.64km2 cleared in 2015, the amount of land reduced by technical survey in 2016 rose significantly, compared to the 8.39km2 reduced in 2015.[127] The BHMAC reported that 46.94km2 was canceled through non-technical survey.[128] However, the 2016 survey output was inflated as the area reported as released by survey and clearance, including as canceled by non-technical survey, includes the results of the EU pilot project over three and a half years, and not just in 2016.[129]

BHMAC reported that land release activities under the pilot project had been fully conducted on a total of six SHAs in BiH in 2016, with an estimated total area of 25.5km2. BHMAC conducted non-technical survey, while accredited organizations conducted technical survey and mine clearance. Technical survey reduced 2km2, clearance released 0.4km2 (and destroyed 215 mines and 84 items of ERW), and 22.3km2 was canceled through non-technical survey. After the verification process, 24.7km2 was released to the final users. As per the data provided by BHMAC, less than 10% of the SHA was treated by technical methods.[130]

NPA implemented its pilot project of targeted technical survey over suspected mined areas, in coordination with BHMAC, in the municipality of Travnik, in the Middle Bosnia Canton. This included development of SOPs, and application and testing of new techniques, processes, and procedures for targeted technical survey.[131] It was hoped that this would limit the need for full clearance. NPA reported that the results were positive, and that they planned to expand the use of technical survey with targeted investigation to the municipality of Ravno.[132] For SHAs with incorrect minefield records, traditional systematic technical survey typically required 20–30% of the resources needed for full clearance, whereas targeted technical survey only required 1–3%, based on the results of NPA’s relatively limited pilot project.[133]

Survey in 2016 (mines)

In 2016, BiH reported that 10.39km2 was reduced by technical survey across 183 tasks and 46.94km2 was canceled by non-technical survey (see table below).[134] The figure of 46.94km2 reported as canceled by non-technical survey, however, included the results of the full three and a half year EU pilot project, rather than the annual cancelation output for 2016.[135] This was likely due to a delay in sign off of the results of the EU pilot project, and subsequent delay in entry into the database, due to QC considerations.

In addition, 75 SHAs totaling 1.3km2 were confirmed as mined.[136]

Technical survey was conducted by the BiH Armed Forces, the Federal Administration of Civil Protection, the Civil Protection Administration of Republika Srpska, and 13 other clearance organizations (see the Operators section above).[137]

Only BHMAC, with the assistance of an NPA non-technical survey team seconded to it, canceled SHAs and confirmed areas as mined in 2016.[138]

Survey of mined area in 2016[139]

Canton

Area canceled (m2)

Area reduced (m2)

Unsko-sanki

4,914,108

740,803

Posavski

389,460

527,159

Tuzlanski

4,004,922

1,401,296

Zeničko-dobojski

439,791

1,344,235

Bosansko-podrinjski

90,110

112,325

Srednje-bosanski

14,491,633

1,515,606

Hercegovačko-neret

7,759,750

416,783

Zapadno-hercegovački

0

0

Sarajevo

2,151,640

834,725

Canton 10

3,068,847

45,838

Total Federation BiH

37,310,261

6,938,770

Total Republika Srpska

7,952,808

2,863,266

Total District Brčko

1,680,751

588,965

Sum total

46,943,820

10,391,001

 

Clearance in 2016 (mines)

In 2016, mine clearance operations in BiH were conducted by the Armed Forces, the Civil Protection of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the Civil Protection of Republika Srpska, and 13 other clearance organizations (see the Operators section above).[140] More than 60% of the organizations engaged in small tasks each cleared a total of less than 100,000m2 during the year.[141]

Overall, a total of almost 1.34km2 was cleared in 2016, across 84 tasks, during which 1,313 antipersonnel mines, 63 antivehicle mines, and 1,192 items of ERW were destroyed (see table below).[142] This is less than the 1.64km2 cleared in 2015,[143] and well below the 2009–2019 mine action strategy target of 9.27km2.

Mine clearance in 2016[144]

Canton

Area cleared (m2)

AP mines destroyed

AV mines destroyed

ERW destroyed

Unsko-sanki

75,089

69

6

57

Posavski

43,381

14

10

118

Tuzlanski

133,782

146

1

112

Zeničko-dobojski

85,974

332

11

167

Bosansko-podrinjski

27,565

3

0

10

Srednje-bosanski

302,761

151

13

72

Hercegovačko-neret

103,467

65

9

33

Zapadno-hercegovački

0

0

0

0

Sarajevo

133,635

200

0

224

Canton 10

15,315

36

4

6

Total Federation BiH

920,969

1,016

54

799

Total Republic Srpska

403,926

283

8

366

Total District Brčko

10,284

14

1

27

Sum total

1,335,179

1,313

63

1,192

Note: AP = antipersonnel; AV = antivehicle.

Land Release (cluster munition remnants)

In 2017, a total of 0.1km2 of cluster-contaminated area was released by clearance while 0.76km2 was reduced by technical survey. No area was reported by BHMAC as canceled by non-technical survey.[145] This represents a decrease compared to 2015, when 0.23km2 was fully cleared, 0.76km2 was reduced by technical survey, and 0.47km2 was canceled by non-technical survey.[146] 0.47km2 was confirmed to be contaminated.

Survey in 2016 (cluster munition remnants)

In 2016, non-technical survey of areas suspected to contain cluster munition remnants was conducted by BHMAC and an NPA team seconded to BHMAC regional offices. In addition, BHMAC, the BiH Armed Forces, and NGOs NPA and Pro Vita, all conducted technical survey.[147]

During survey operations 0.76km2 was reduced by technical survey, all within the Federation BiH.[148] Sixteen SHAs were confirmed as contaminated, totaling 0.47km2 (see table below).[149]

Cluster munition remnants survey in 2016[150]

Operator

Areas confirmed

Confirmed area (m2)

Area reduced by TS (m2)

BHMAC*

16

470,000

0

BiH Armed Forces

0

0

192,604

NPA

0

0

520,728

Pro Vita

0

0

48,931

Total

16

470,000

762,263

Note: * Includes survey support from NPA; TS = technical survey.

Clearance in 2016 (cluster munition remnants)

In 2016, four operators cleared a total of 0.1km2 containing cluster munition remnants, destroying 632 submunitions and 26 other items of UXO, all in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (see table below).[151]

Clearance of cluster munition-contaminated area in 2016[152]

Operator

Areas cleared

Area cleared (m2)

Submunitions destroyed

Other UXO destroyed

Armed Forces BiH

6

51,126

333

5

Federal Administration of Civil Protection

4

7,618

150

18

NPA

4

N/R

149

3

Pro Vita

1

42,059

0

0

Total

15

100,803

632

26

Note: N/R = not reported.

Deminer safety

In 2016, there were two demining accidents, both involving antipersonnel PROM-1 mines. The first was in March 2016, during clearance operations in the municipality of Usora, during which a team leader was killed. The second, also in March, was during technical survey operations of the NGO Eko-Dem in the municipality of Osmaci, during which one deminer was killed, and two people injured.[153]

Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 Compliance

Under Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty (and in accordance with the 10-year extension request granted by States Parties in 2008), BiH is required to destroy all antipersonnel mines in mined areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but not later than 1 March 2019. BiH is not on track to meet this deadline, and is planning to prepare and submit an Article 5 extension request in 2018.[154]

BiH has reported that its Article 5 extension request will coincide with its anticipated national mine action strategy for 2018–2025, and will be in accordance with the Maputo Declaration, adopted in 2014.[155] The new strategy will also highlight the importance of full implementation of the land release concept.[156]

Mine clearance in 2012–2016[157]

Year

Area cleared (km²)

2016

1.34

2015

1.64

2014

1.85

2013

1.89

2012

1.30

Total

8.02

 

In 2016, as in all years since it was granted the 10-year extension to its initial Article 5 deadline, BiH fell far short of its land release targets.[158]

In May 2016, BHMAC reported that analysis of the Mine Action Strategy 2009–2019, showed that BiH is currently 3.5 years behind in fulfilling its Article 5 obligations, due to a lack of funding.[159] BHMAC reported that more detailed information about completion of clearance would be available at the end of 2017, after it had conducted the third revision of the mine action strategy,[160] which is now intended to be produced as a new Mine Action Strategy for 2018–2025.

In March 2016, the UNDP reported that the results of the pilot project to date show that continued application of a land release approach will greatly accelerate reduction and cancelation of SHA in BiH, and reduce costs.[161] As of May 2017, BHMAC reported that new evidence-focused land release methodology was improving the mine action process and that it planned to greatly expand the application of technical survey with targeted investigation and of systematic technical survey in BiH.[162] According to BiH, “Results gained so far through the realisation of these projects in the period 2014–16 allow for optimism that the application of this concept in the next period will greatly speed up the process of releasing the suspect hazardous areas, which will become more cost effective and cheaper.”[163]

Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 4 Compliance

Under Article 4 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, BiH is required to destroy all cluster munition remnants in areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but not later than 1 March 2021. It is unclear whether BiH is on track to meet this deadline.

The 2012 Mine Action Strategy Revision had expected that BiH would “completely eliminate” all cluster munition-contaminated areas by 2015.[164] In the second Mine Action Strategy Revision, conducted in 2015 and adopted by the Demining Commission in March 2016, this target was pushed back to the end of 2017.[165] However, based on the status of current cluster munition survey and clearance operations, BiH no longer expects to meet its Article 4 obligations by the end of 2017, as it had previously stated at the Convention on Cluster Munitions First Review Conference in September 2015 and forecast in its second Mine Action Strategy Review.[166]

While BHMAC has stated that it does not expect any obstacles in meeting its Article 4 deadline of 1 March 2021,[167] the fact that less than 1km2 of cluster munition-contaminated land has been cleared in the last five years (see table below), is cause for concern. It is now not certain that BiH will indeed meet its Article 4 deadline.

(See the Support to Mine Action profile for details of funding to mine action in BiH.)

Five-year summary of cluster munition clearance[168]

Year

Area cleared (km2)

2016

0.10

2015

0.23

2014

0.26

2013

0.24

2012

0.16

Total

0.99

 

 

The Monitor acknowledges the contributions of the Mine Action Review (www.mineactionreview.org), which has conducted the mine action research in 2017, including on survey and clearance, and shared all its resulting landmine and cluster munition reports with the Monitor. The Monitor is responsible for the findings presented online and in its print publications.



[1] The BiH Mine Action Center (BHMAC) reported 23.46km2 of confirmed hazardous area (CHA), whereas the Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report reported an estimated 315.75km2 of CHA. (See Contamination section for further details.)

[2] Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) Protocol V Article 10 Report (for 2016), Form A.

[3] Email from Goran Zdrale, Senior Officer for Analysis and Reporting, BHMAC, 17 May 2017; and Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2016), Form C.

[4] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2016), Form C; and email from Tarik Serak, Head of Operations, BHMAC, 13 November 2017. However, BiH’s CCW Protocol V Article 10 Report (for 2016), Form A, reports suspected mined area of 1.118km2 across 8,796 “micro locations.”

[5] Statement of BiH, Mine Ban Treaty Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 8 June 2017.

[6] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017; and BHMAC, “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016,” February 2017, p. 5.

[7] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2015), Form C.

[8] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2016), Form C. This compares to an estimated 82,000 mines and UXO reported as of the end of 2015, Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2015), Form C. BiH’s CCW Protocol V Article 10 Report (for 2016), Form A, estimates approximately 79,000 mines and UXO.

[9] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2016), Form C.

[10] Audit Office of the Institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, “Performance Audit Report. Efficiency of the Demining System in Bosnia and Herzegovina,” 4 November 2016, p. 5.

[11] UNDP, “Draft Mine Action Governance and Management Assessment for Bosnia and Herzegovina,” 13 May 2015, p. 17.

[12] Email from Lillian Palmbach, UNDP, 29 May 2015.

[14] Ibid., pp. 118.

[15] Ibid., pp. 241–243.

[16] Statement of BiH, Mine Ban Treaty Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 8 June 2017.

[17] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[18] BHMAC, “Analysis of implementation of mine action strategy of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2009–2019) and draft amendments,” adopted by the Demining Commission on 28 March 2016, p. 3.

[19] Audit Office of the Institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, “Performance Audit Report. Efficiency of the Demining System in Bosnia and Herzegovina,” 4 November 2016, p. 26.

[20] Email from Darvin Lisica, NPA, 5 May 2016.

[21] Mine Ban Treaty Revised Article 5 deadline Extension Request, 27 June 2008, p. 4; BHMAC, “Bosnia and Herzegovina Mine Action Annual Report 2014,” May 2015, p. 5; and email from Tarik Serak, BHMAC, 27 May 2015.

[22] Interview with Tarik Serak, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 20 March 2015.

[23] BHMAC, “The accident in the Municipality of Bugojno,” 5 September 2016; and Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2016), Form C; BHMAC, “Mine accident in the municipality Pelagićevo,” 8 November 2016; Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2016), Form C; and email from David Rowe, Advisor, GICHD, 14 September 2017.

[24] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[25] Email from Tarik Serak, BHMAC, 26 May 2016. BiH’s Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2015) reported the 7.3km2 of suspected contamination, but not the 0.85km2 of confirmed contamination BHMAC has reported to Mine Action Review.

[26] Emails from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May and 6 June 2017.

[27] Ibid.; and Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2015), Form F.

[28] Interview with Braco Pandurevic, Head of Operations, NPA BiH, Sarajevo, 9 May 2017; and BHMAC, “Analysis of implementation of mine action strategy of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2009–2019) and draft amendments,” adopted by the Demining Commission on 28 March 2016, p. 9.

[29] Interview with Saša Obradovic, Director, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[30] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 6 June 2017. There is a discrepancy with the 3.44km2 (2.7km2 of improvised submunition contamination, plus an additional 0.74km2 of conventional cluster munition contamination) in areas that also contain mine contamination, as reported in BHMAC, “Analysis of implementation of mine action strategy of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2009–2019) and draft amendments,” adopted by the Demining Commission on 28 March 2016, p. 9.

[32] BHMAC, “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016,” February 2017, p. 15.

[33] Email from Darvin Lisica, NPA BiH, 5 May 2016.

[34] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[35] Ibid.; Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2015), Form J; and BHMAC, “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016,” February 2017, p. 6.

[36] BHMAC, “Organisational chart,” undated.

[37] UNDP, Draft Mine Action Governance and Management Assessment for BiH, 13 May 2015, p. 22; and email from Suad Baljak, UNDP, 15 June 2017.

[38] BHMAC, “The appointment of new members of Demining Commission in Bosnia and Herzegovina,” News Item, 24 July 2015; and “Official Gazette of BH,” No. 67/15 – Decision of establishment of demining commission of BH by Counsel of Ministers of BH, 30 July 2015.

[39] Email from Suad Baljak, UNDP, 15 September 2017.

[40] UNDP, “Draft Mine Action Governance and Management Assessment for BiH,” 13 May 2015, p. 22.

[41] Bosnia and Herzegovina Official Gazette, Sarajevo, 17 March 2002.

[42] BHMAC, “Organisational chart,” undated.

[43] Audit Office of the Institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, “Performance Audit Report. Efficiency of the Demining System in Bosnia and Herzegovina,” 4 November 2016.

[44] Council of Ministers of BiH, “The conclusions of the 24th session of the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina,” 22 September 2015.

[45] Interview with Saša Obradovic, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017; and email from David Rowe, GICHD, 14 September 2017.

[46] BHMAC, “Analysis of implementation of mine action strategy of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2009–2019) and draft amendments,” adopted by the Demining Commission on 28 March 2016, p. 17.

[47] Audit Office of the Institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, “Performance Audit Report. Efficiency of the Demining System in Bosnia and Herzegovina,” 4 November 2016, pp. 24 and 31.

[48] Interview with Tarik Serak, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017; and emails from Fotini Antonopoulou, EU, 19 June 2017; and from Suad Baljak, UNDP, 15 June 2017; and UNDP BiH, “Mine Action Board of Donors Meeting,” 31 March 2016.

[49] Interviews with Haris Lokvancic, Advisor on Political Affairs, Programme Officer – Human Security/Justice, Swiss Embassy, Sarajevo, 9 May 2017; with Fotini Antonopoulou, EU, in Sarajevo, 10 May 2017; and with Lt.-Col. Martin Herrmann, Defence Attaché to Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo, German Embassy, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[50] Emails from David Rowe, GICHD, 14 September 2017; and from Josephine Dresner, Programme Manager, MAG, 24 September 2017.

[51] Audit Office of the Institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, “Performance Audit Report. Efficiency of the Demining System in Bosnia and Herzegovina,” November 2016, p. 28.

[52] Interview with Tarik Serak, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[53] CCW Protocol V Article 10 Report (for 2015), Form B.

[54] Statement of BiH, 13th Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 5 December 2013, p. 2.

[55] Ibid.

[56] Ibid., pp. 2–3.

[57] UNDP, “Draft Mine Action Governance and Management Assessment for Bosnia and Herzegovina,” 13 May 2015, p. 17.

[58] Statement of BiH, 14th Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 18 December 2015; and email from Tarik Serak, BHMAC, 26 May 2016.

[59] Email from Tarik Serak, BHMAC, 26 May 2016.

[60] BHMAC, “Analysis of implementation of mine action strategy of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2009–2019) and draft amendments,” adopted by the Demining Commission on 28 March 2016, p. 14.

[61] BHMAC, “Analysis of implementation of mine action strategy of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2009–2019) and draft amendments,” adopted by the Demining Commission on 28 March 2016, p. 6; and statement of BiH, 14th Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 1 December 2015.

[62] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017; and Audit Office of the Institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, “Performance Audit Report. Efficiency of the Demining System in Bosnia and Herzegovina,” 4 November 2016, p. 25.

[63] Interview with Åsa Massleberg, Advisor, Strategic Management, GICHD, Geneva, 9 March 2017; and email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[64] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017; and interview with Saša Obradovic, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[65] Interviews with Åsa Massleberg, GICHD, Geneva, 9 March 2017; and with Saša Obradovic, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[66] Interview with Haris Lokvancic, Swiss Embassy, Sarajevo, 9 May 2017.

[67] Email from Suad Baljak, UNDP, 15 September 2017.

[68] Interview with Saša Obradovic, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[69] Email from Suad Baljak, UNDP, 15 September 2017.

[70] Statement of BiH, Mine Ban Treaty Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 8 June 2017.

[71] Email from Suad Baljak, Mine Action Officer, UNDP, 15 September 2017.

[72] Interviews with Darvin Lisica, NPA, Sarajevo, 8 May 2017; with Fotini Antonopoulou, EU, in Sarajevo, 8 May 2017; and with Saša Obradovic and Tarik Serak, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[73] Interviews with Darvin Lisica, NPA, Sarajevo, 8 May 2017; and with Saša Obradovic, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[74] Interview with Darvin Lisica, NPA, in Sarajevo, 8 May 2017.

[75] Ibid.

[76] Email from Darvin Lisica, NPA, 31 August 2017.

[77] UNDP, “Draft Mine Action Governance and Management Assessment for BiH,” 13 May 2015, p. 25.

[78] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[79] UNDP, “Mine Action Board of Donors Meeting,” 31 March 2016; and email from Amela Balic, NPA, 17 June 2016.

[80] Audit Office of the Institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, “Performance Audit Report. Efficiency of the Demining System in Bosnia and Herzegovina,” 4 November 2016, p. 23.

[81] Interview with Zdravko Jonjić, Assistant Director for Operations, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[82] Email from Suad Baljak, UNDP, 15 June 2017; and see, Council of Ministers of BiH, “Decision of the establishment of working group for the design of changes on the Demining law in BH,” August 2016, p. 8.

[83] Statement of BiH, Mine Ban Treaty Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 8 June 2017.

[85] Statement of BiH, Mine Ban Treaty Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 8 June 2017.

[86] UNDP, “Draft Mine Action Governance and Management Assessment for BiH,” 13 May 2015, pp. 23 and 24.

[87] Interview with Tarik Serak, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 20 March 2015.

[88] UNDP, “Draft Mine Action Governance and Management Assessment for BiH,” 13 May 2015, p. 23.

[89] BHMAC, “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016,” February 2017, p. 18; and Audit Office of the Institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, “Performance Audit Report. Efficiency of the Demining System in Bosnia and Herzegovina,” No. 01-02-03-10-16-1-1101/16, November 2016, p. 26.

[90] BHMAC, “Adoption of three new chapters of Mine Action Standard for land release, the new approach for solving the mine problem,” 28 January 2016; and email from Fotini Antonopoulou, EU, 18 September 2017.

[91] Email from Suad Baljak, UNDP, 15 September 2017, and BHMAC, “Temporary Guidelines,” July 2017.

[92] Emails from Darvin Lisica, NPA, 11 August 2015; and from Tarik Serak, BHMAC, 26 May 2016; and statement of BiH, First Convention on Cluster Munitions Review Conference, Dubrovnik, 9 September 2015.

[93] Interview with Saša Obradovic, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[94] BHMAC, “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016,” February 2017, p. 20.

[95] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017; and BHMAC, “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016,” February 2017, pp. 18 and 24.

[96] Emails from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017; and from Suad Baljak, UNDP, 15 September 2017; and statement of BiH, Mine Ban Treaty Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 8 June 2017.

[97] Email from Amela Balic, NPA, 20 October 2016. This application of targeted investigation was part of the original EU Land Release pilot project, and the concept was subsequently trialled and adopted more widely in BiH. Technical survey with targeted investigation was piloted by NPA in 2015, and has subsequently been expanded and implemented by other operators and state bodies, including the BiH Armed Forces and civil protection entities. The process consists of first applying elements of non-technical survey, including desk studies and collection of evidence of contamination. Field-based targeted investigations are then conducted, and the outputs analysed to assess any CHA identified. As part of this process, BHMAC and NPA identified new sources of information for inclusion, including from former soldiers and commanders, and members of the local population who provided valuable data on mine contamination. Several methodologies can then be applied as part of the technical survey to locate the target contamination, including the use of manual clearance lane(s) towards a specific target, the use of detection dogs to search for a specific target, or the use of drones to help identify a specific target. Selection of techniques for each target is guided by several factors, including analysis of the characteristics of indirect evidence examined and environmental conditions (including the type of terrain and density of vegetation). Interview with Darvin Lisica, NPA, in Sarajevo, 8 May 2017.

[98] BHMAC, “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016,” February 2017, p. 20.

[99] Ibid., pp. 20–21; and CCW Protocol V Article 10 Report (for 2016), Form A.

[100] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017; and BHMAC, “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016,” February 2017, p. 12.

[101] UNDP, “Draft Mine Action Governance and Management Assessment for BiH,” 13 May 2015, p. 29.

[102] Ibid.; and interviews with Darvin Lisica, NPA, in Sarajevo, 8 May 2017; with Haris Lokvancic, Swiss Embassy, Sarajevo, 9 May 2017; and with Tarik Serak, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[103] Interview with Lt.-Col. Dzevad Zenunovic, Demining Battalion of the Armed Forces of BiH, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[104] Ibid.

[105] Ibid.

[106] Email from Amela Balic, NPA Bosnia, 15 April 2015.

[107] Emails from Darvin Lisica, NPA, 5 May 2016; and from Goran Sehić, Deputy Programme Manager, NPA BiH, 10 July 2017.

[108] Interview with Lt.-Col. Zenunovic, Demining Battalion of the Armed Forces of BiH, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[109] Interview with Muamer Husilović and Ahmet Dulović, Federal Civil Protection of BiH, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017; and interview with Tarik Serak, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[110] Email from Goran Sehić, NPA, 10 July 2017; and interview with Darvin Lisica, NPA, Sarajevo, 8 May 2017.

[111] Email from Goran Sehić, NPA, 10 July 2017.

[112] Interview with Darvin Lisica, NPA, in Sarajevo, 8 May 2017.

[113] Interview with Josephine Dresner, MAG, in Sarajevo, 9 May 2017.

[114] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[115] Ibid.

[116] Ibid.

[117] Interview with Blažen Kovač, Ministry of Defense, Chair of the Demining Commission, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[118] UNDP, “Draft Mine Action Governance and Management Assessment for BiH,” p. 35.

[119] Email from Fotini Antonopoulou, EU, 18 September 2017.

[120] BHMAC, “Bosnia and Herzegovina Mine Action Annual Report 2011,” adopted by the Demining Commission, May 2012, p. 22; and email from Tarik Serak, BHMAC, 6 May 2014.

[121] UNDP, “Draft Mine Action Governance and Management Assessment for BiH,” 13 May 2015, pp. 6, 27.

[122] Audit Office of the Institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, “Performance Audit Report. Efficiency of the Demining System in Bosnia and Herzegovina,” 4 November 2016, pp. 5 and 9.

[123] Ibid., pp. 27–28.

[124] Interview with Saša Obradovic, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[125] BHMAC, “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016,” February 2017, p. 18.

[126] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[127] Email from Tarik Serak, BHMAC, 26 May 2016.

[128] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[129] Email from Tarik Serak, BHMAC, 24 October 2017.

[130] Statement of BiH, Mine Ban Treaty Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 8 June 2017; BHMAC, “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016,” February 2017, p. 19; and emails from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May and 10 July 2017.

[131] Email from Darvin Lisica, NPA, 5 May 2016.

[132] Email from Goran Sehić, NPA, 10 July 2017.

[133] Email from Darvin Lisica, NPA, 5 May 2016.

[134] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2016), Form C; and email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[135] Email from Tarik Serak, BHMAC, 24 October 2017.

[136] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[137] Ibid.

[138] Ibid.; and email from Goran Sehić, NPA, 10 July 2017.

[139] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2016), Form C; and email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[140] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017; and BHMAC, “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016,” February 2017, p. 11.

[141] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[142] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2016), Form C; and email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[143] Email from Tarik Serak, BHMAC, 26 May 2016.

[144] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2016), Form C; BHMAC, “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016,” February 2017, p. 11; and email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017. There was a discrepancy between clearance data provided by BHMAS for NPA, and that provided by NPA for its 2016 operations. NPA reported that it had cleared 19 mined areas, totalling 0.13km2, with the destruction of 503 antipersonnel mines, eight antivehicle mines, and 161 items of UXO. Email from Goran Sehić, NPA, 10 July 2017.

[145] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[146] Email from Tarik Serak, BHMAC, 26 May 2016.

[147] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[148] Ibid.; and BHMAC, “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016,” February 2017, p. 14.

[149] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[150] Ibid.; Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2016), Form F (however, the land reduced by technical survey was not disaggregated from the land released through clearance, in the reporting form); and BHMAC, “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016,” February 2017, p. 14. In addition, NPA also reported supporting BHMAC to cancel 32 SHAs totaling just over 1.7km2 and to confirm 29 areas covering just over 0.8km2, in addition to reducing just over 0.2km2 through technical survey.

[151] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017; and BHMAC, “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016,” February 2017, p. 14.

[152] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2016), Form F (however, the land reduced by technical survey was not disaggregated from the land released through clearance, in the reporting form); and email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017. Whereas BHMAC did not record the area cleared by NPA, NPA reported that it cleared had 258,126m2. Furthermore, the 7,618m2 reported to have been cleared by the Federal Administration of Civil Protection, only includes the area of the one task that was completed in 2016. However, the Federal Administration of Civil Protection reported that it had cleared an additional 275,916m2 in 2016, in clearance tasks which had not yet been completed as at the end of 2016. Email from Muamer Husilović, Federal Civil Protection of BiH, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[153] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2016), Form C; BHMAC, “Report on Mine Action in BiH for 2016,” February 2017, p. 6.; and emails from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May and 19 October 2017.

[154] Interview with Saša Obradovic, BHMAC, Sarajevo, 10 May 2017.

[155] Statement of BiH, Mine Ban Treaty Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 8 June 2017.

[156] Ibid., 8 June 2017.

[157] See Mine Action Review and Landmine Monitor reports on clearance in BiH covering 2012–2015.

[158] BHMAC, “Analysis of implementation of mine action strategy of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2009–2019) and draft amendments,” adopted by the Demining Commission on 28 March 2016, p. 19.

[159] Email from Tarik Serak, BHMAC, 26 May 2016.

[160] Ibid.; and from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[161] UNDP, “Mine Action Board of Donors Meeting,” Press Release, 31 March 2016.

[162] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[163] Statement of BiH, Mine Ban Treaty Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 8 June 2017.

[164] BHMAC, “Revision of Mine Action Strategy in Bosnia and Herzegovina 2009–2019 (First Revision 2012),” 14 March 2013, p. 13; and email from Darvin Lisica, NPA, 5 May 2016.

[165] BHMAC, “Analysis of implementation of mine action strategy of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2009–2019) and draft amendments,” adopted by the Demining Commission on 28 March 2016, p. 17.

[166] Email from Tarik Serak, BHMAC, 26 May 2016; and from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[167] Email from Goran Zdrale, BHMAC, 17 May 2017.

[168] See Cluster Munition Monitor and Mine Action Review reports on clearance in BiH covering 2012–2016.