China

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

Last updated: 01 August 2017

Summary: Non-signatory China acknowledges the humanitarian rationale for the convention, but says it is not willing to consider accession. China abstained from voting on key UN resolutions on the convention in 2016 and 2015. It has participated as an observer in all of the convention’s Meetings of States Parties as well as the First Review Conference. China has acknowledged that it produces, exports, and stockpiles cluster munitions, but says it has never used them.

Policy

The People’s Republic of China has not acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions. In September 2016, China told the convention’s Sixth Meeting of States Parties that it “appreciates the humanitarian spirit embodied in the convention,” but it did not directly address the question of whether it will accede in future.[1]

Previously, in September 2014, China acknowledged the humanitarian rationale for the convention, but informed the States Parties that it was not considering accession “at this stage” because of “national conditions and national defence needs.” It did, however, for the first time affirm that “China ascribes to the goal and principles” of the convention.[2]

China reiterated its long-held view on the importance of explicitly establishing the principle that “the users of cluster munitions, particularly those who massively used cluster munitions on other countries’ territory, shall effectively shoulder the responsibility for their clearance.”[3] China has also objected to how the convention was negotiated outside of UN auspices.[4]

In December 2016, China abstained from the vote on a key UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolution that calls on states outside the Convention on Cluster Munitions to “join as soon as possible.”[5] China abstained from the vote on the first UNGA resolution on the convention in December 2015.[6]

China did not participate in the Oslo Process that produced the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[7] When the convention opened for signature in Oslo in December 2008, China issued a statement saying that it would continue to work for an “early and proper solution on the humanitarian problems arising from cluster bombs.”[8]

China has participated as an observer in every Meeting of States Parties of the convention as well as the First Review Conference in 2015. It attended the convention’s intersessional meetings in 2011 and 2013–2014. China has readily met with Cluster Munition Coalition representatives and Monitor researchers to discuss its views on cluster munitions and its position on the convention. China has expressed concern over the use of cluster munitions in its capacity as a member of the UN Security Council (UNSC). It voted in favor of a June 2015 UNSC resolution that expressed concern at evidence of cluster munition use by the government of Sudan.[9] China voted in favor of a May 2014 UNSC resolution expressing concern at the use of cluster munitions in South Sudan.[10]

China is not party to the Mine Ban Treaty.

China is a party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW). China used to state that existing international humanitarian law was sufficient to deal with the issue of cluster munitions, but in 2008 supported efforts to create a new CCW protocol on cluster munitions. In 2011, the CCW failed to agree to a new protocol on cluster munitions, effectively ending its deliberations on the topic and leaving the Convention on Cluster Munitions as the sole instrument dedicated to ending the suffering caused by cluster munitions. China has not proposed any new CCW work on cluster munitions since 2011.

Use

China has repeatedly stated that it has never used cluster munitions anywhere in the world.[11] In September 2016, it told States Parties that it “has never used cluster munitions abroad.”[12]

Production, transfer, and stockpiling

China has acknowledged to the Monitor that it produces, stockpiles, and exports cluster munitions.

China Northern Industries (NORINCO) produces a range of conventional air-dropped and surface-launched cluster munitions including bombs, artillery projectiles, and rockets. The Sichuan Aerospace Industry Corporation, a subsidiary of state owned China Aerospace Science and Technology, produces and markets 302mm (WS-1, WS-1B, and WS-1E) and 320mm (WS-2) unguided multiple-launch surface-to-surface artillery rockets. Among the warheads available for these rockets are “armor-defeating and killing double use cluster,” “comprehensive effect cluster,” and “sensor fused cluster.”[13] In 2012, China’s Baicheng Weapon Test Center provided information on a terminal sensing sub-projectile cluster munition rocket.[14] Additionally, several of China’s ballistic missile systems are reported to have warheads that contain conventional explosive submunitions, but few details are available.[15]

Cluster munitions produced in China[16]

Type

Caliber

Carrier Name

Number

Submunition Type

Projectiles

120mm

Type W01

30

DPICM

122mm

Type-83

30

Type-81 DPICM

130mm

Type-59

35

Type-81 DPICM

152mm

Type-62

63

Type-81 DPICM

152mm

Type-66

63

Type-81 DPICM

155mm

Unknown

72

Type-81 DPICM

203mm

Unknown

100

DPICM

Bombs

 

Anti-runway

12

Unknown

Antitank

16

Unknown

BL-755 clone
340 Kg

147
189

Unknown
Unknown

Type 2
Type 2
Type 2

42
26
28

AP bomblets
AT bomblets
APAM

Rockets

107mm
122mm
122mm
273mm
302mm
320mm

Type-63
Type-81
Type-90A
WM-80
WS-1, -1B, -1E
WS-2

16
39
39
320

Type-81 DPICM
Type-90 DPICM
DPICM
DPICM
DPICM, CEM, SFW
DPICM, CEM, SFW

Note: DPICM = dual-purpose improved conventional munitions; AP = antipersonnel; AT = antitank; APAM = antipersonnel/antimateriel; CEM = combined effects munition; SFW = sensor fuzed weapon.

 

State owned China Aerospace Science and Industry has developed the SY300 and SY400, 300 mm and 400 mm munitions, respectively, with dual-purpose submunitions and blast fragmentation warhead options.[17] The China Precision Machinery Import and Export Corporation promoted the SY300, SY400, and P12 systems at the IDEX 2015 fair in Abu Dhabi.[18]

In February 2016, China’s military TV channel reportedly broadcast footage of a China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation DF-16B medium-range ballistic missile capable of delivering a cluster munition warhead over 800–1,000 kilometers.[19]

In March 2012, a government official stated that “China has a strict policy on exporting weapons including cluster munitions. Export of such weapons should not go against China’s relevant laws and regulations, and that without export license issued by the competent authorities [sic] is also not allowed.”[20]

While the full extent of Chinese exports of cluster munitions is not known, cluster munition remnants of Chinese origin have been found in Iraq, Israel, Lebanon, and Sudan. Hezbollah fired more than 100 Chinese Type-81 122mm rockets containing Type-90 (also called MZD-2) dual-purpose improved conventional munition (DPICM) submunitions into northern Israel in July/August 2006. Submunitions from these weapons were also found in southern Lebanon by UN and Lebanese deminers after the cessation of the conflict.[21]

Another type of DPICM submunition of Chinese origin, called Type-81, was found and photographed by deminers in Iraq in 2003.[22] The US military’s unexploded ordnance identification guide also identifies the Chinese 250kg Type-2 dispenser as being present in Iraq.[23] Additionally, the NGO Landmine Action identified a Rockeye-type cluster bomb with Chinese language external markings in Yei, Sudan in October 2006.

At least 30 Chinese financial entities are involved in investments in manufacturers of cluster munitions according to a 2017 report.[24]



[1] Statement of China, Convention on Cluster Munitions Sixth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 6 September 2016. During the meeting, the delegation of China met with Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC) representatives to provide feedback on the depiction of Taiwan on a map in the print edition of Cluster Munition Monitor 2016. ICBL-CMC meeting with Liang Guotao, Deputy Division Director, Department of Arms Control, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in Geneva, September 2016.

[2] Statement of China, Convention on Cluster Munitions Fifth Meeting of States Parties, San Jose, Costa Rica, 2 September 2014.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Ibid.; and statement of China, Convention on Cluster Munitions Fourth Meeting of States Parties, Lusaka, 10 September 2013.

[5]Implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” UNGA Resolution 71/45, 5 December 2016.

[6]Implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” UNGA Resolution 70/54, 7 December 2015.

[7] For details on China’s policy and practice regarding cluster munitions through early 2009, see Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 195–196.

[8] Wang Hongjiang, “Ministry: China supports int’l efforts to ban cluster bombs,” Chinese Government’s Official Web Portal, 2 December 2008.

[9] In the resolution’s preamble, the Security Council expresses “concern at evidence, collected by AU-UN Hybrid Operation in Darfur (UNAMID), of two air-delivered cluster bombs near Kirigiyati, North Darfur, taking note that UNAMID disposed of them safely, and reiterating the Secretary-General’s call on the Government of Sudan to immediately investigate the use of cluster munitions.” UN Security Council Resolution 2228 (2015) Renewing Mandate of Darfur Mission until 30 June 2016, 29 June 2015.

[10] The resolution noted “with serious concern reports of the indiscriminate use of cluster munitions” and called for “all parties to refrain from similar such use in the future.” UN Security Council, “Security Council, Adopting Resolution 2155 (2014), Extends Mandate of Mission In South Sudan, Bolstering Its Strength to Quell Surging Violence,” SC11414, 27 May 2014.

[11] Statement of China, Convention on Cluster Munitions First Review Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 8 September 2015; statement of China, Convention on Cluster Munitions Second Meeting of States Parties, Beirut, 13 September 2011; and statement of China, Convention on Cluster Munitions First Meeting of States Parties, Vientiane, 10 November 2010. Notes by the CMC. At the CCW in April 2010 and February 2011, China stated that it has “never used cluster munitions outside its territories.” Statement by Amb. Wang Qun, CCW Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) on Cluster Munitions, Geneva, 12 April 2010; and statement of China, CCW GGE on Cluster Munitions, Geneva, 21 February 2011. Notes by the CMC.

[12] Statement of China, Convention on Cluster Munitions Sixth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 6 September 2016. During the meeting, the delegation of China met with CMC representatives to provide feedback on the depiction of Taiwan on a map in the Cluster Munition Monitor 2016 print edition. ICBL-CMC meeting with Liang Guotao, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in Geneva, September 2016.

[13] Sichuan Aerospace Industry Corporation, “Our Products,” undated.

[14] “Significant breakthrough made in PLA’s terminal sensing ammunition technology,” PLA Daily, 9 April 2012.

[15] Chinese ballistic missile systems reported to be capable of delivering conventional explosive submunitions among the warhead options include the DF-11, DF-15, DF-21, and M-7 (Project 8610). For details see Duncan Lennox, Jane’s Strategic Weapons Systems, Issue 46 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, January 2007).

[16] The primary sources for information on China’s cluster munitions are: Robert Hewson, ed., Jane’s Air-Launched Weapons, Issue 44 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2004), p. 837; and Leland S. Ness and Anthony G. Williams, eds., Jane’s Ammunition Handbook 2007–2008, 15 January 2008 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2007). This table is supplemented with information from United States (US) Defense Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense, “Improved Conventional Munitions and Selected Controlled-Fragmentation Munitions (Current and Projected) DST-1160S-020-90,” 8 June 1990, partially declassified and made available to HRW under a Freedom of Information Act request.

[17] The larger SY-400 mod version carries a 300kg payload capable of delivering a 660 cluster-bomblet warhead. The company’s short-range P-12 missile is also capable of carrying an anti-armour submunitions warhead.

[19] R.D. Fisher Jr., “PLA flaunts strategic missiles of its Rocket Force,” IHS Janes Defence Weekly, 16 February 2016. See also, J. Lin and Peter W. Singer, “New Chinese Ballistic Missile Crashes the Battlefield Party With Cluster Munitions,” Popular Science, 19 February 2016.

[20] Email from Lai Haiyang, Attaché, Department of Arms Control and Disarmament, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 5 March 2012.

[22] Colin King, ed., Jane’s Explosive Ordnance Disposal 2007–2008, CD-edition, 15 January 2008 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2008).

[23] US Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technical Division, “Iraq Ordnance Identification Guide, Dispenser, Cluster and Launcher-2,” undated.