Sri Lanka

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

Last updated: 04 September 2020

Ten-Year Review: Sri Lanka acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 1 March 2018. Sri Lanka has participated in the convention’s meetings and served as president of the Ninth Meeting of States Parties in September 2019. It voted in favor of a key United Nations (UN) resolution promoting the convention in December 2019.

According to Sri Lanka’s initial transparency report provided in February 2019, it has never produced cluster munitions and does not possess a stockpile.

Policy

The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 1 March 2018 and the convention entered into force for the country on 1 September 2018.

Sri Lanka stated in September 2019 that it was “exploring…internal processes” to see if “a separate legal enactment to give effect to the Convention is required” or if “adequate legal provisions already exist, to enable the implementation of all Convention related obligations.”[1] Previously, in February 2019, Sri Lanka said it was checking to determine if new legislation is needed to enforce its implementation of the convention’s provisions.[2]

Since its accession to the convention in 2018, Sri Lanka’s Ministry of Defense has initiated a program to educate Sri Lanka’s security forces to ensure they comply with the convention’s provisions at all times.[3]

Sri Lanka submitted its initial Article 7 transparency report for the convention on 26 February 2019.[4]

Sri Lanka participated in one meeting of the Oslo Process that created the Convention on Cluster Munitions, in Vienna, Austria in December 2007. It attended a regional meeting on cluster munitions in Bali, Indonesia in November 2009.

Prior to its accession Sri Lanka participated as an observer in every meeting of the convention.[5] It participated as a State Party in the convention’s Eighth Meeting of States Parties in Geneva in September 2018. Sri Lanka served as President of the Ninth Meeting of States Parties, also in Geneva, in September 2019.

Sri Lanka has participated in several regional workshops on the convention, such as one hosted in Vientiane, Lao PDR in April 2019 and one held by the Philippines in Manila on 18–19 June 2019.

In December 2019, Sri Lanka voted in favor of a UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolution, which urges states outside the Convention on Cluster Munitions to “join as soon as possible.”[6] It has voted in favor of the annual UNGA resolution promoting the convention since it was first introduced in 2015.

Sri Lanka has also voted in favor of UNGA resolutions condemning the use of cluster munitions in Syria, most recently in December 2018.[7]

Sri Lanka acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty on 13 December 2017. Sri Lanka is also a party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons.

Production, transfer, and stockpiling

In February 2019, Sri Lanka reported that it has not produced cluster munitions and does not possess any stocks of cluster munitions, including for research and training purposes.[8]

Use

In September 2018, Sri Lanka stated that it “has never used cluster munitions.”[9] Previously, Sri Lankan officials repeatedly stated that its armed forces did not possess cluster munitions and never used the weapon.[10]

Past allegations of use

Sri Lanka has emphatically denied claims that it used cluster munitions in 2008–2009 in the northern Vanni region.[11] In 2017, Sri Lanka said that with respect to allegations of cluster munition use during its military operation against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), the “Sri Lanka Army, Sri Lanka Navy and Sri Lanka Air Force re-iterated their earlier stand that they have never used Cluster Munitions”[12]

In 2016, it was reported that three mine clearance operators had cleared cluster munition remnants, including unexploded submunitions, from at least six different sites in the north of the country since 2009.[13] The reports quoted an operator, who said it could not be determined who used the cluster munitions or when, but said they could have been used “any time within the last three decades.”

The Sri Lankan Air Force possesses aircraft capable of delivering Soviet-made cluster munitions, while the LTTE had light planes incapable of carrying them. The Indian Air Force possesses RBK-500 series cluster bombs and was involved in a military intervention against the LTTE in northern Sri Lanka in 1987–1990.



[1] Statement of Sri Lanka, Convention on Cluster Munitions Ninth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 2 September 2019.

[2] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form A, 26 February 2019.

[3] Statement on Clearance, Convention on Cluster Munitions Ninth Meeting of States Parties, 3 September 2019.

[4] The report covers an initial period and every form states ‘’nil’’ with the exception of Form A on national implementation measures. As of August 2020, Sri Lanka has not provided an annual updated report for the convention. The report was due by 30 April 2020.

[5] Sri Lanka has participated as an observer in every Meeting of States Parties of the convention since 2011. Sri Lanka also attended the First Review Conference in 2015.

[6]Implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 74/62, 12 December 2019.

[7]Situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic,” UNGA Resolution 73/182, 17 December 2018. Sri Lanka abstained from the vote on a similar resolution in December 2019.

[8] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Forms B, C, D and E, 26 February 2019.

[9] Statement of Sri Lanka, Convention on Cluster Munitions Eighth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 3 September 2018.

[10] Statement of Sri Lanka, Convention on Cluster Munitions First Review Conference, Dubrovnik, 9 September 2015. Notes by the Monitor. See also, Monitor meeting with Amb. Dr. Palitha T.B. Kohona, and Dilup Nanyakkara, Advisor, Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka to the UN in New York, New York, 19 October 2010.

[11] See, Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 242–243. In October 2009, Sri Lankan Army Commander Lt.-Gen. J. Jayasuriya stated, “Where the cluster munitions are concerned, I wish to categorically state that such inhumane weapons have never, and will never be used by the Sri Lankan Armed Forces.” See also, “Flow of arms to terrorists must stop,” Daily News, 28 October 2009. In early 2009, a media report alleged that Sri Lankan forces used cluster munitions against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, while attacking Pudukkudyirippu Hospital. “U.N. cites Sri Lanka cluster bomb use: The U.S., EU, Norway and Japan join in a plea to the Tamil Tiger rebels to end their failing separatist struggle and avoid more deaths,” Los Angeles Times, 4 February 2009. A UN spokesperson initially said the hospital was attacked with cluster munitions, but retracted the statement after further investigation. See, “UN accepts Sri Lanka has not used cluster bombs – website,” BBC Monitoring South Asia, 5 February 2009; and Walter Jayawardhana, “UN Spokesman Accepts Sri Lanka Never Had Cluster Bombs,” Ministry of Defence, 5 February 2009. In 2011, a UN Panel of Experts report noted the government’s denial and said that it was unable to reach a conclusion on the credibility of the allegation of use of cluster munitions by Sri Lanka. Report of the Secretary General’s Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka, 31 March 2011, p. 47.

[12] Email from Mafusa Lafir, Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka to the UN in Geneva, to Mary Wareham, Arms Division, HRW, 26 May 2017. In 2016, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) recommended the Sri Lankan government investigate the allegations of past cluster munition use, stating that, “the High Commissioner calls for an independent and impartial investigation to be carried out” following “recent reports on new evidence that has emerged on the use of cluster munitions towards the end of the conflict, following similar allegations in the OHCHR investigation report.” See OHCHR, “Promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka,” A/HRC/32/CRP.4, 28 June 2016, p. 8.

[13] The Guardian published photographs showing clearance operators preparing to destroy the remnants of an RBK-500 AO-2.5RT cluster bomb and reported that HALO Trust had cleared 42 cluster munitions—likely submunitions—from sites near Pachchilapalli. Emmanuel Stoakes, “Sri Lanka denies cluster bombs found in war zones were government weapons,” The Guardian, 26 June 2016. See also, Emmanuel Stoakes, “Cluster bombs used in Sri Lanka's civil war, leaked photos suggest,” The Guardian, 20 June 2016.


Impact

Last updated: 15 March 2024

COUNTRY SUMMARY

Sri Lanka is contaminated by landmines and explosive remnants of war (ERW) as a result of three decades of conflict between the government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), which ended in May 2009. Both sides extensively used mines, including P4 Mk I and Mk II antipersonnel blast mines, laid in long defensive belts. Both landmines and improvised explosive devices (IEDs) were laid by LTTE.[1] Indian peacekeeping forces also used mines during their presence in Sri Lanka from 1987 to 1990.[2]

Sri Lanka had initially projected completion of mine clearance by the end of 2020. However, it reported that insufficient international funding, along with the identification of 2.88km2 ofnew contamination in 2019, had pushed back the completion date.[3] Sri Lanka has released a National Mine Action Completion Strategy for 2023–2027.[4]

Mine/ERW risk education is incorporated into the school curriculum in Northern and Eastern provinces, while risk education is provided at community level by national non-governmental organizations (NGOs).[5] Sri Lanka is responsible for significant numbers of mine survivors in need of assistance. The Ministry of Health collaborated closely with the National Mine Action Center (NMAC) to coordinate victim assistance activities.[6]

ASSESSING THE IMPACT

Contamination 

Extent of contamination[7]

 

Antipersonnel landmine

Cluster munition remnant

Other

Extent of contamination

Medium

 

Unknown

 

Unknown

Reported contamination

15.43km2

CHA: 13.52km2

SHA: 1.91km2

N/A

N/A

 Note: CHA=confirmed hazardous area; SHA=suspected hazardous area; N/A=not applicable.

Landmine contamination

Sri Lanka’s security forces used antipersonnel and antivehicle mines throughout the conflict with the LTTE. All minefield locations were recorded, with data handed over to the national mine action program at the end of the conflict.

The LTTE laid nuisance and protective minefields in front of their defensive positions, using mostly antipersonnel mines but also antivehicle mines, improvised mines, and IEDs. Mines were also scattered on the ground during the LTTE’s rapid retreat in the north and east during the final stages of the conflict from 2006–2009. No LTTE minefield records were available.[8]

Demining operators in Sri Lanka have encountered a wide range of LTTE devices, including antipersonnel mines with anti-tilt and anti-lift mechanisms. Tripwire-activated Claymore-type mines were also used by the LTTE, in addition to improvised devices.[9]

Landmine contamination is still present in nine districts across Northern, Eastern, and North Central provinces. In total, 15.43km² of contaminated land covered 534 confirmed hazardous areas (CHAs) and 87 suspected hazardous areas (SHAs) as of the end of 2022.[10]

Some of the remaining landmine contamination is in forested areas, where unique biodiversity is protected by legislative policies. Sri Lanka has stated that contamination will be cleared in line with International Mine Action Standard (IMAS) 07.13 on Environmental Management.[11]

The number of contaminated areas recorded in Sri Lanka has increased since 2017, with new SHAs identified as a result of livelihood activities after the resettlement of internally displaced persons (IDPs).[12] During 2020, re-survey continued in Northern, Eastern, and North Central provinces to inform the strategy and workplan to completion.[13] In 2021–2022, non-technical survey was conducted jointly by the Sri Lankan Army and demining operators.[14]

Cluster munition remnants contamination

Sri Lanka is not believed to be contaminated by cluster munition remnants. However, since 2009, three demining operators have reported clearing cluster munition remnants, including unexploded submunitions, from at least six locations in northern Sri Lanka.[15] An operator, quoted in a 2016 media report, indicated that it could not be determined who used the cluster munitions, but that they may have been used at “any time within the last three decades.”[16]

Sri Lanka’s initial Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report, submitted in 2019, and its National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027, both state that Sri Lanka does not have cluster munition stockpiles, or contamination in areas under its jurisdiction or control.[17]

Other types of contamination

Sri Lanka remains contaminated with ERW including unexploded air-dropped bombs, artillery shells and missiles, mortar bombs, hand-held antitank projectiles, rifle grenades, and hand grenades. Large caches of abandoned explosive ordnance (AXO) also exist, particularly in the north.[18] These are being cleared concurrently with the remaining minefields.[19]

Casualties

5-year casualties total: 2018–2022

Year

Injured

Killed

Unknown

Total

2022

3

0

0

3

2021

1

1

0

2

2020

2

0

0

2

2019

9

1

0

10

2018

0

0

9

9

Sri Lanka has recorded a total of 1,719 mine/ERW casualties, from 1985 to 2022.[20] However, the actual number of casualties is likely to be significantly higher.

In 2015, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) reported that 22,177 casualties had been recorded since the 1980s, including 1,603 civilians. From 2006–2009, accurate casualty data was difficult to access amid ongoing conflict, leading to under-reporting.[21] In April 2010, it was reported that since the 1980s, there had been 21,993 landmine casualties in Sri Lanka. This total included 1,419 civilian returnees; 3,770 recorded amputees among the armed forces, police, and civil defense forces; and 16,804 mine casualties among LTTE members.[22] 

     Casualties in 2022[23]

Injured

Killed

Unknown

Total

Change from previous year

3

0

0

3

Increase from 2 casualties in 2021

 

Casualty demographics in 2022

Adult

Men

Women

Unknown

0

2

0

0

Children

Boys

Girls

Unknown

0

0

1

0

 

Casualties by civilian status in 2022

Civilian

Military

Deminer

Unknown

3

0

0

0

 

Casualties by device type in 2022

APM

AVM

Improvised mine

Unspecified mine type

CMR

ERW

Unknown mine/ERW

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

 Note: APM=antipersonnel mines; AVM=antivehicle mines; CMR=cluster munition remnants;   ERW=explosive remnants of war.

In 2022, Sri Lanka recorded three mine/ERW incidents in Northern province, with two men injured in Kilinochchi district and a girl injured in Mullaitivu district. All three casualties in 2022 were civilians. The type of mine or ERW involved was not reported in each case.[24]

Cluster munition casualties

No cluster munition casualties have been recorded in Sri Lanka by the Monitor. In 2009, the International Truth and Justice Project (ITJP) published a report that referenced casualties due to what were described as cluster munitions. Yet the weapon was reported with the designation OFAB 500 ShR, a parachute-retarded aerial bomb with multiple warheads that, due to its size and weight, does not meet the definition of a cluster munition under the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[25] This designation is consistent with reporting and images from use of OFAB 500 ShR bombs in 2008.[26]

COORDINATION 

Summary table

Mine action

Main Coordination Body    

Coordination Mechanism

Strategy/plan

National Mine Action Standards      

NMAC

Direct

National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027

National standards aligned with IMAS in development

Risk education

Main Coordination Body    

Coordination Mechanism

Strategy/plan

National Mine Action Standards      

NMAC

Direct

National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027

National standards aligned with IMAS in development

Victim assistance

Main Coordination Body    

Coordination Mechanism

Strategy/plan

National Mine Action Standards

Ministry of Social Services

 

NMAC

Direct

National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027

National standards aligned with IMAS in development

 Note: NMAC=National Mine Action Center; IMAS=International Mine Action Standards.

ADDRESSING THE IMPACT

Clearance

Management and coordination

Management and coordination overview

Sri Lanka’s national mine action program was established in 2002. NMAC was established in 2010, marking the program’s transition to national ownership from its previous management by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). NMAC operated under the Ministry of Housing and Construction during 2022.

The Regional Mine Action Office (RMAO) in Kilinochchi is responsible for coordination, tasking, and quality management. NMAC and RMAO work closely with District Steering Committees for Mine Action, which are chaired by the heads of district authorities.[27]

Legislation and standards

Sri Lanka has reported that land release operations are conducted in line with IMAS.[28]

NMAC is in the process of updating Sri Lanka’s national mine action standards and reviewing the Standard Operating Procedures among demining operators. Four national standards were drafted and awaiting final approval as of September 2022. Standards on land release, non-technical survey, and quality management were in the process of being updated in 2023.[29]

Strategies and policies

The National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027 features a revised clearance plan, based on the results of re-survey in Northern, Eastern, and North Central provinces.

In creating the strategy, several Sri Lankan government ministries, and operators, participated in stakeholder workshops in Colombo in June 2022, which were facilitated by NMAC and the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD).[30]A further workshop was held in September 2022 ahead of the strategy’s submission to the government for approval.[31] 

Information management

Sri Lanka uses Information Management System for Mine Action (IMSMA) Next Generation. NMAC plans to transfer to IMSMA Core, with support from GICHD.[32]

Sri Lanka noted in March 2023 that its IMSMA reporting forms did not include requirements for additional explanation for decisions on reduction and cancellation. By the end of 2023, all relevant IMSMA forms were to be reviewed and updated in line with national standards.[33]

Gender and diversity

Sri Lanka reported in 2023 that it is committed to ensuring mine action activities are sensitive to gender and diversity, and to continuing mainstreaming efforts. Sri Lanka reported that mine action data is disaggregated data by sex, age, and disability.[34] 

In June 2022, Sri Lanka held an online gender and diversity workshop facilitated by GICHD, to aid the mainstreaming of gender and diversity into mine action activities.[35]

The alignment of Sri Lanka’s mine action strategy with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 5 on Gender Equality; the Women, Peace and Security agenda; and the United Nations (UN) Gender Guidelines for Mine Action Programs, provides a strong framework in this area.[36] 

In 2020, a GICHD study found that 50% of female Sri Lankan deminers interviewed were the sole income earners in their households, and that more than one-third of women deminers did not receive any income before being employed in mine action, compared to 1 in 20 men.[37]

Clearance operators

National clearance operators include the Sri Lankan Army-Humanitarian Demining Unit and the Skavita Humanitarian Assistance and Relief Project (SHARP). SHARP has worked as a national subcontractor of Delvon Assistance for Social Harmony (DASH) since 2010.[38]

International demining operators in Sri Lanka include the HALO Trust and Mines Advisory Group (MAG), which have both worked in country since 2002.[39]

Land release: antipersonnel landmines

2022 land release overview: Landmines[40]

Area cleared (km²)

Area reduced (km²)

Area cancelled (km²)

Total area released (km²)

APM destroyed

11.8

0.98

0.1

12.89

29,599

 Note: APM=antipersonnel mines.

In 2022, Sri Lanka reported clearing 29,599 antipersonnel landmines, as well as 73 antivehicle mines and 33,322 ERW.[41] The Monitor reported clearance in Sri Lanka totaling 11.8km2.

In 2022, the HALO Trust reported released a total of 2.65km² of land in Sri Lanka, destroying 12,351 antipersonnel landmines, including 115 destroyed during explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) spot tasks. It also destroyed five antivehicle mines and 10,036 items of unexploded ordnance (UXO).[42]

Five-year landmine clearance: 2018­–2022[43]

Year

Area cleared (km²)

Area reduced (km²)

Area cancelled (km²)

Total area released (km²)

APM destroyed

2022

11.8

0.98

0.1

12.89

29,599

2021

4.1

0.34

0.04

4.48

26,804

2020

N/R

N/R

N/R

4.59

43,157 

2019

6.31

N/R

4.43

10.74

N/R

2018

N/R

N/R

N/R

3.46

N/R

 Note: APM=antipersonnel mines; N/R=not reported.

Consistent annual data on landmine clearance has not been provided by Sri Lanka. However, it was reported that since 2002, a total of 5,152 areas, totaling 1,312.11km², had been cleared of mines/ERW. As of the end of 2022, a total of 878,786 antipersonnel mines and 1,562,294 ERW (including antivehicle mines) had been destroyed during clearance operations.[44]

Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 clearance deadline

Summary of Article 5 clearance deadline extension request(s)

Original deadline

Extension period

(no. of request)

Current deadline

Status

1 June 2028

N/A

1 June 2028

On target

 

  Note: N/A=not applicable.

Sri Lanka acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty on 13 December 2017, and the treaty entered into force for the country on 1 June 2018.[45] In accordance with Article 5, Sri Lanka aims to ensure the destruction of all antipersonnel mines as soon as possible, but no later than 1 June 2028.

In 2022, Sri Lanka cited several possible barriers to meeting this deadline, including reduced international donor funding, climate-induced changes, mine clearance in forests and wildlife reserves, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the presence of improvised mines.[46]

Land release: cluster munition remnants

No clearance of cluster munitions remnants was reported in 2022.

In 2016, it was reported that three clearance operators had cleared cluster munition remnants, including unexploded submunitions, from six sites in northern Sri Lanka since 2009.[47] 

Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 4 clearance deadline

Sri Lanka acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 1 March 2018. The convention entered into force for the country on 1 September 2018. Sri Lanka reports that it does not have any cluster munition remnants contamination in areas under its jurisdiction or control.[48] 

Residual hazards

As completion approaches, Sri Lanka is set to transition to address future residual mine/ERW risks. The Sri Lankan Army-Humanitarian Demining Unit has a prominent role in the national mine action program, meaning that Sri Lanka is well positioned to manage residual risk.[49] Sri Lanka will ensure that the recording and sharing of data continues, using IMSMA Core.[50]

The national strategy for 2023–2027 includes an objective on staff transition, as thousands of deminers will require alternative employment as the program gradually reduces in size.[51]

Risk education 

Highlights from 2022

Management and coordination

Management and coordination overview 

NMAC coordinates risk education activities in Sri Lanka, with demining operators organizing programs. Risk education is coordinated at both national and district level, including through the education system and village-level mine action committees. RMAO also runs programs.[52]

Legislation and standards

Sri Lanka’s national standard on risk education was reviewed in line with IMAS.[53]

Strategies and policies 

Sri Lanka’s national mine action strategy for 2023–2027 requires that risk education programs are developed on the basis of needs assessments; and are sensitive to gender, age, disability, and the diversity of affected communities.[54]

Information management

The reporting of risk education data in Sri Lanka has not been consistent or rigorous.[55] 

Gender and diversity

Risk education activities reached women, girls, men, and boys in 2022.[56] Risk education teams in Sri Lanka are reported to observe gender norms.[57]

Risk education operators

During 2022, NMAC coordinated risk education activities, RMAO provided risk education to district and local officials, and the Sri Lankan Police delivered safety messages and prevented illegal activities in relation to the collection of UXO. The Ministry of Education oversees the inclusion of risk education into the school curriculum in Northern and Eastern provinces.[58]

Local NGOs are also permitted to conduct risk education under NMAC. UNICEF, along with international NGOs including the HALO Trust and MAG, have also supported activities.[59]

Beneficiary data

Beneficiary data in 2022[60]

Operator

Men

Boys

Women

Girls

Persons with disabilities

HALO Trust

69

170

99

136

N/R

MAG

110

28

90

32

N/R

 Note: N/R=not reported.

Target groups

Context-specific mine/ERW risk education is provided to all affected populations and at-risk groups. Programs in Sri Lanka are developed on the basis of needs assessments, and tailored to the threat encountered by the local population.[61]

People from the south of Sri Lanka who visit the north and east are at higher risk due to a lack of knowledge on mine/ERW contamination. Livelihood activities such as farming, and scrap metal and firewood collection, were also considered high risk.[62]

Risk education was provided to forest officers in all districts of Northern province. As a result of these sessions, several new hazardous areas were identified in 2022.[63]

Resettled civilians were targeted, to raise awareness of the mine/ERW threat during livelihood activities, and to ensure that suspicious objects were reported. Due to mine and ERW incidents resulting from new development projects, illegal explosives harvesting, and sand mining, risk education was provided to people involved in those activities.[64]

RMAO primarily targets district and village administrative officers, government departments, police officers, construction workers, and schools in high-risk areas.[65]

In 2022, RMAO continued to provide risk education to police officers in Northern province. These sessions were reported to have aided implementation of EOD spot tasks, in the context of obtaining court orders for mine/ERW callouts after reports of ordnance from civilians.[66]

Delivery methods

Risk education is integrated into the school curriculum in Northern and Eastern provinces. Explosive Ordnance Risk Education (EORE) training materials and tools were developed and disseminated in the Tamil and Sinhala languages.[67]

Participants of risk education sessions in Sri Lanka were often given umbrellas, caps, exercise books, water bottles, and posters in order to attract crowds and draw attention.[68]

All areas known or suspected to contain antipersonnel landmines are marked. Warning signs, which are replaced and maintained regularly, are displayed in Sinhala, Tamil, and English.[69]

Victim assistance

Highlights from 2022

In 2022, NMAC allocated 5 million Sri Lankan rupees (approximately US$15,500) to provide immediate assistance to mine/ERW victims. The support included livelihood assistance, water and sanitation facilities, as well as prosthetics, orthotics, and assistive devices.

Management and coordination

Legal frameworks or policies on disability inclusion

The National Council for Persons with Disabilities, with the support of the Mine Ban Treaty’s Implementation Support Unit (ISU) and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), convened a multistakeholder workshop in 2022 on updating the National Action Plan on the Equalization of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Provincial-level consultations were held, and the national action plan was amended to require the National Disability Council to consult persons with disabilities on public decision-making processes, as well as their representative organizations.[70]

The Ministry of Social Services leads on matters pertaining to persons with disabilities in Sri Lanka. The ministries for health, education, and defense also provide assistance.[71]

Strategies and policies

Sri Lanka’s National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027 outlines NMAC’s victim assistance responsibilities, covering awareness-raising, coordination, and data collection.[72]

Information management

NMAC maintains a database on mine/ERW victims, though reporting is often inconsistent.[73]

Victim assistance providers

The Ministry of Social Services oversees issues related to persons with disabilities.

The government-run Ranaviru Sevana Rehabilitation Center provides physical rehabilitation, socio-economic inclusion services, and other assistance to disabled veterans.

The Jaffna Jaipur Center for Disability Rehabilitation (JJCDR) provides rehabilitation services, prosthetics, and psychosocial assistance. Social Organizations Networking for Development (SOND) provides emergency support and economic assistance to new landmine and ERW survivors. Caritas Valvuthayam Mannar provides prosthetics and mobility devices.

International providers of victim assistance in Sri Lanka include the Meththa Foundation, which provides prosthetics and mobility devices. Humanity & Inclusion (HI) provides rehabilitation and disability inclusion services.[74]

Needs assessment

A survey was being undertaken by NMAC in Northern, Eastern, and North Central provinces, to verify data that had identified 403 victims across five districts, as of the end of 2022.[75]

The Ministry of Health was developing a hospital-based injury surveillance system in 2023, with the aim of registering all incidents including those caused by mines/ERW.[76]

Medical care and rehabilitation

Five rehabilitation hospitals provided services to mine/ERW survivors in 2022: the Ragama Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Hospital, the Digana Rehabilitation Hospital, the Maliban Rehabilitation Hospital, the Jayanthipura Rehabilitation Hospital, and the Kandagolla Rehabilitation Hospital. The Ragama hospital functions as a national hospital, while the other four operate at provincial level.[77] National and international NGOs provided rehabilitation services in the north and east of Sri Lanka.[78]

Several initiatives aimed to improve rehabilitation services, including the adoption of National Guidelines on Rehabilitation Services, and the adaptation of the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Assistive Devices List to the Sri Lanka context.[79]

JJCDR provided prosthetics, rehabilitation, and socio-economic assistance, with support from the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). JJCDR also visited amputees at the government-run Jaffna Teaching Hospital for post-amputation care, and made field visits.[80]

Caritas Valvuthayam Mannar works with NMAC to provide prosthetics and mobility devices at the Mannar Rehabilitation Center, and runs an outreach program covering areas including Kilinochchi, Mullaithievu, and Puttalam.[81]

The Ranaviru Sevana Rehabilitation Center provides physical rehabilitation, socio-economic inclusion, and other assistance to disabled veterans.[82]

The Leahy War Victims Fund (LWVF), under the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), has supported the WHO and Results for Development (R4D) to strengthen and integrate rehabilitation services into Sri Lanka’s healthcare system.[83]

Socio-economic and psychosocial inclusion

There is an absence of efforts to guarantee the rights of persons with disabilities in Sri Lanka, particularly in rural areas, limiting their economic and social inclusion.[84]

Psychological support is available in all districts of Northern province, where NGOs were also reported to be providing counseling services.[85]



[1] Interviews with demining operators, Colombo, 29 March–2 April 2010; and with Maj. Pradeep Gamage, Officer-in-Charge, North Jaffna Humanitarian Demining Unit, Jaffna, 3 April 2007.

[2] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Strategy 2016–2020,” May 2016, p. 6.

[3] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), p. 3. See, Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Database.

[4] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 5.

[5] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 26.

[6] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 17.

[7] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), Form C, p. 5.

[8] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 7.

[9] Email from Valon Kumnova, HALO Trust, 11 April 2014; and Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Strategy 2016–2020,” May 2016, p. 6. Improvised devices emplaced by the LTTE included those designed to act as fragmentation mines, bar mines, electrical and magnetically-initiated explosive devices, and mines connected by detonating cord to mortar and artillery shells.

[10] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), Form C, p. 5.

[11] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 9.

[12] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2020), pp. 10–12.

[13] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2020), p. 18.

[14] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2018), p. 5.

[15] The Guardian published photographs that showed clearance operators preparing to destroy the remnants of an RBK-500 AO-2.5RT cluster bomb. It reported that the HALO Trust cleared 42 cluster munition remnants (likely submunitions) from sites near Pachchilapalli, which saw fighting between government and LTTE forces at the end of the war. The HALO Trust said it reported the clearance at the time by submitting the records to the government-run mine action center. See, Emanuel Stoakes, “Sri Lanka denies cluster bombs found in war zones were government weapons,” The Guardian, 26 June 2016; and Emanuel Stoakes, “Cluster bombs used in Sri Lanka’s civil war, leaked photos suggest,” The Guardian, 20 June 2016.

[16] Emanuel Stoakes, “Sri Lanka denies cluster bombs found in war zones were government weapons,” The Guardian, 26 June 2016.

[19] Email from Matthew Hovell, Regional Director, HALO Trust, 30 September 2018.

[21] Email from Mihlar Mohamed, UNICEF, 11 May 2015.

[22] Statement of Brig. Udaya Nanayakkara, Chief Field Engineer, Sri Lankan Army, in “On landmines and explosive remnants of war: raising awareness and taking Action,” Asian Tribune, 30 April 2010.

[23] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 26.

[24] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 26.

[29] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 22.

[30] GICHD, “Annual Report 2022,” 15 June 2023, p. 21.

[31] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 5.

[32] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 13.

[33] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 22.

[34] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 16.

[36] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 10.

[38] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2021), p. 12.

[39] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 37.

[40] Sri Lanka did not provide annual land release figures in its Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report for 2022. The figures outlined in the table were calculated by the Monitor, based on the reported all-time figures for clearance and antipersonnel mines destroyed in 2021 and 2022.

[41] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 11.

[42] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Nadine Lainer, Deputy Programme Manager, HALO Trust Sri Lanka, 22 April 2023.

[43] ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Sri Lanka: Impact,” updated 19 November 2021.

[44] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 12.

[46] Presentation of Sri Lanka, “Moving towards completion by 2027,” Mine Ban Treaty intersessional meetings, Geneva, 20–22 June 2022.

[47] The Guardian published photographs showing clearance operators preparing to destroy the remnants of an RBK-500 AO-2.5RT cluster bomb and reported that the HALO Trust had cleared 42 cluster munitions—likely submunitions—from sites near Pachchilapalli. Emmanuel Stoakes, “Sri Lanka denies cluster bombs found in war zones were government weapons,” The Guardian, 26 June 2016; and Emmanuel Stoakes, “Cluster bombs used in Sri Lanka’s civil war, leaked photos suggest,” The Guardian, 20 June 2016.

[48] Sri Lanka Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), Form F. See, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Database.

[50] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 28.

[51] GICHD, “Annual Report 2022,” 15 June 2023, p. 21.

[52] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 28.

[53] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 24.

[54] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 21.

[55] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 13.

[56] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 21.

[57] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 29.

[58] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 28.

[59] ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Sri Lanka: Impact,” updated 19 November 2021.      

[60] Responses to Monitor questionnaire by Nadine Lainer, Deputy Programme Manager, HALO Trust Sri Lanka, 24 April 2023; and by MAG, 19 September 2023.

[61] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 21.

[62] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 29.

[63] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 30.

[64] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 30.

[65] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 30.

[66] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 30.

[67] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 10.

[68] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 31.

[69] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 29.

[70] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 23.

[71] Committee on Victim Assistance, “Preliminary Observation: Sri Lanka: Status of Implementation – Victim Assistance,” Mine Ban Treaty intersessional meetings, Geneva, 19–21 June 2023.

[72] Sri Lanka, “National Mine Action Completion Strategy 2023–2027,” March 2023, p. 25.

[73] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 17.

[74] ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Sri Lanka: Impact,” updated 19 November 2021.

[75] Committee on Victim Assistance, “Preliminary Observation: Sri Lanka: Status of Implementation – Victim Assistance,” Mine Ban Treaty intersessional meetings, Geneva, 19–21 June 2023.

[76] Committee on Victim Assistance, “Preliminary Observation: Sri Lanka: Status of Implementation – Victim Assistance,” Mine Ban Treaty intersessional meetings, Geneva, 19–21 June 2023.

[77] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 21.

[78] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 22.

[79] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 22.

[80] JJCDR, “Discussion on Sustainability,” 25 September 2020.

[81] Caritas Valvuthayam Mannar, “Annual Report 2020,” 14 December 2020; Caritas Valvuthayam Mannar, “Mid-Year Report: January to June 2021,” 26 August 2021; and Vidya Abhayagunawardena and Sindhu Ratnarajan, “Sri Lanka Needs a Comprehensive Approach to Victim Assistance (VA),” in Sri Lanka Campaign to Ban Landmines (SLCBL), “Sri Lanka’s Mine Action Story: Achievements, Challenges and Opportunities,” 2019, p. 36.

[82] Manohari Katugampala, “Getting them on their feet,” Daily News, 9 December 2020.

[83] United States (US) Department of State, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement (PM/WRA), “To Walk the Earth in Safety: January–December 2020,” April 2021, p. 51.

[84] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 22.

[85] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), p. 19.


Mine Ban Policy

Last updated: 14 November 2023

Policy

The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty on 13 December 2017 and the treaty entered into force for the country on 1 June 2018.

Sri Lanka adopted specific national legislation to implement the Mine Ban Treaty in February 2022.[1] The Prohibition of Anti-Personnel Mines Act provides penalties for violations of up to 10 years imprisonment and a fine of 500,000 rupees.[2] Under the law, a citizen of Sri Lanka shall not “receive, use, develop, produce, import, export, sell, expose for sale, purchase, supply, transport, acquire, possess, retain, stockpile or transfer an antipersonnel mine” in Sri Lanka or anywhere in the world. It also prohibits attempts to “modify or convert an anti-personnel mine into any other form of an explosive.” An exception permits Sri Lanka to retain antipersonnel mines, in accordance with the treaty, for “developing, or training persons in, techniques of mine detection, mine clearance, mine deactivation, or mine destruction,” and states that the number of mines retained “shall not exceed the minimum number absolutely necessary” for those purposes.

Sri Lanka has provided six Article 7 transparency reports since joining the treaty, most recently in June 2023.[3]

Sri Lanka has regularly participated in meetings of the Mine Ban Treaty, most recently attending the Twentieth Meeting of States Parties held in Geneva in November 2022, where it made a statement on victim assistance. Sri Lanka also attended the intersessional meetings in Geneva in June 2023.

Sri Lanka is party to the Convention on Cluster Munitions. It is also party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) and its Amended Protocol II on landmines. 

Production, transfer, and use

There is no evidence that the government of Sri Lanka has ever produced or exported antipersonnel landmines. Sri Lanka imported antipersonnel mines in the past and possessed a stockpile, which has since been destroyed under the Mine Ban Treaty.

Since the end of armed conflict in May 2009, the Monitor has not received any reports of new use of antipersonnel mines by any entity in Sri Lanka.

Prior to the end of armed conflict, in October 2009, Sri Lanka Army Commander, Lieutenant General Jagath Jayasuriya, said that “the use of mines by the Sri Lankan military is strictly limited and restricted to defensive purposes only…to demarcate and defend military installations,” adding that mined areas are “marked accordingly…and relevant records systematically maintained.”[4] Earlier in 2009, Brigadier Lasantha Wickramasuriya acknowledged that the Sri Lanka Army had used antipersonnel mines in the past, including non-detectable Belgian, Chinese, and Italian mines, as well as bounding and fragmentation mines of Pakistani, Portuguese, and United States (US) manufacture.[5]

In 2008–2009, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), a non-state armed group (NSAG), laid large quantities of mines across the north of Sri Lanka.[6] Prior to its demise, the LTTE was considered expert in making explosive weapons. It was known to produce several types of antipersonnel mines: Jony 95 (a small wooden box mine), Rangan 99 or Jony 99 (a copy of the P4MK1 Pakistani-made mine), SN96 (a Claymore-type mine), and fragmentation antipersonnel mines from mortars. The LTTE also produced other variants of some of these antipersonnel mine types—including some with antihandling features—as well as Amman 2000 MK1 and MKII antivehicle mines.[7]

During 1987–1990, the Indian military and peacekeeping forces used landmines in northern and eastern parts of Sri Lanka.[8] 

Stockpiling and destruction

Sri Lanka initially declared a stockpile of 77,865 antipersonnel mines of nine types. Sri Lanka’s declared stockpile of antipersonnel landmines included mines of Belgian, Chinese, Italian (or Singaporean), and Pakistani origin, as well as unknown mine types.[9] This total was adjusted by Sri Lanka during the stockpile destruction process, which commenced in 2018.[10]

In October 2021, Sri Lanka announced that it had completed the destruction of its stockpiled antipersonnel mines, well in advance of its Mine Ban Treaty deadline of 1 June 2022.[11] The last 11,840 antipersonnel mines were destroyed in Kilinochchi district, Northern province.[12] In June 2023, Sri Lanka reported having destroyed an overall total of 129,496 antipersonnel landmines.[13]

Retention

As of December 2022, Sri Lanka retained 9,825 mines for research and training purposes.

In 2018, Sri Lanka initially announced that it was retaining 21,153 antipersonnel landmines. It has progressively reduced that number as mines have been consumed.[14] According to Sri Lanka, the mines “are used for training of mine detection dogs, training and testing on mechanical assets and equipment used in de-mining activities and testing de-miners PPE [personal protective equipment] in consideration of blast effects produced by different types of antipersonnel mines.” The Sri Lanka Army, as well as the navy, air force, and police, all use retained mines in training programs.[15]

According to Sri Lanka’s June 2023 Article 7 transparency report, it consumed or otherwise destroyed a total of 4,664 retained mines in 2022, when compared to the data on retention in its report for the previous year.[16]

Antipersonnel mines retained by Sri Lanka (as of December 2022)[17]

Type

Mines retained (as of December 2021)

Mines retained (as of December 2022)

P4MK I

1,678

19

P4MK II

11,340

8,894

Type 72

508

244

VS50

760

491

Type 1969

165

139

PRB 409

38

38

Total

14,489

9,825

 



[1] The Prohibition of Anti-Personnel Mines Act was certified by Parliament on 17 February 2022 and published in the National Gazette on 18 February 2022. See, Parliament of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, “Prohibition of Anti-Personnel Mines Act, No. 3 of 2022,” 17 February 2022.

[2] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, 21 July 2022, Form A. See, Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Database; and Krishnan Francis, “Sri Lanka approves law implementing anti-land mine treaty,” Associated Press, 10 February 2022. In June 2021, Sri Lanka had reported that “Cabinet approval was obtained in September 2020 to proceed with the draft of the prohibition of Anti-Personal Mines Bill.” It noted that several drafts of the bill had been circulated between the Department of Legal Draftsman, the Ministry of Justice, and the Attorney General’s Department.

[3] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, 21 July 2022. Sri Lanka also provided a voluntary initial Article 7 transparency report for the treaty in 2005.

[4]Flow of arms to terrorists must stop,” Sri Lanka Guardian, 28 October 2009.

[5] Presentation on Humanitarian Demining by Brig. Lasantha Wickramasuriya, Sri Lanka Army, Bangkok Workshop on Achieving a Mine-Free South-East Asia, 2 April 2009. The presentation included a section entitled “Types of Mines Used by the Sri Lankan Army,” followed by photographs and titles: P4MK1 (Pakistani antipersonnel mine); M72 (Chinese antipersonnel mine); VS-50 (Italian antipersonnel mine); M16A1 (US bounding antipersonnel mine, however the photograph shows what appears to be a P7MK1 Pakistani or PRBM966 Portuguese bounding mine); PRB 415 (photograph shows what appears to be an NR 409 Belgian antipersonnel mine); PRB 413 (photograph shows what appears to be a Portuguese M421 antipersonnel mine); M15 and ND MK1 antivehicle mines; and M18A1 Claymore mines. The Monitor had previously reported that Sri Lanka acquired antipersonnel mines from China, Italy (or Singapore), Pakistan, Portugal, and perhaps Belgium, the US, and others. In its voluntary Article 7 report submitted in 2005, Sri Lanka noted the presence of these antipersonnel mines in minefields: P4MK1, P4MK2, P4MK3, P5MK1, Type 69 (Pakistan); PRB 413 (Pakistan/Portugal); PRB 409, M696 (Portugal); Type 66, Type 72 (China); and VS-50 (Italy/Singapore). See, Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, voluntary, 13 June 2005, Forms C and H. The Monitor previously identified the following antipersonnel mines as having been used by Sri Lankan government troops in the past: P4 and P3 MK (manufactured by Pakistan); Type 72, Type 72A, and Type 69 (China); VS-50 (Italy or Singapore); NR409/PRB (Belgium); M409 and M696 (Portugal); and M18A1 Claymore mines (US). See, ICBL, Landmine Monitor Report 2004: Toward a Mine-Free World (New York: Human Rights Watch, October 2004), p. 1,118; and ICBL, Landmine Monitor Report 2005: Toward a Mine-Free World (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, October 2005,) p. 881.

[6] See, ICBL, Landmine Monitor 2010 (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, October 2010), p. 14.

[7] Presentation on Humanitarian Demining by Brig. Lasantha Wickramasuriya, Sri Lanka Army, Bangkok Workshop on Achieving a Mine-Free South-East Asia, 2 April 2009. Sri Lanka previously provided technical details of the Jony 95 and Jony 99 mines, which it identified as “produced and used” by the LTTE. Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, voluntary, 13 June 2005, Form H. See also, ICBL, Landmine Monitor Report 2008: Toward a Mine-Free World (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, October 2008), p. 1,017. Maj. Mangala Balasuriya of the Sri Lanka Army’s Field Engineering Brigade stated that during the last stages of the war they encountered a modified antipersonnel landmine that used white phosphorus. Monitor telephone interview with Maj. Mangala Herath, Field Engineering Brigade, Sri Lanka Army, 25 June 2009.

[8] Statement of Sri Lanka, Mine Ban Treaty Seventeenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 26 November 2018.

[9] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, November 2018. The stockpile was initially reported as containing the following mine types (origin in brackets): 1,828 P4MK1 (Pakistan); 73,178 P4MK2 (Pakistan); 1,334 Type 72 (China); 1,208 VS50 (Italy); 254 Type 1969 (unknown); and 47 PRB409 (Belgium).

[10] In November 2018, Sri Lanka announced that physical destruction of its stockpile had already started and that the destruction of 57,033 antipersonnel mines had occurred prior to November 2018. Sri Lanka’s total stockpile prior to destruction commencing was 134,898 antipersonnel mines, including mines intended to be retained for training and research purposes. See, Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, November 2018, Form B. In June 2021, Sri Lanka declared a remaining stockpile of 11,840 antipersonnel landmines and reported that their destruction would be completed in July 2021. See, Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, June 2021, Section 3, Table 2.

[11] In its initial Article 7 transparency report, submitted on 28 November 2018, Sri Lanka declared a stockpile of 77,865 antipersonnel mines. See also, Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, June 2021, Section 3, Table 2.

[12] Mine Ban Treaty Implementation Support Unit (ISU) press release, “Nearly 12,000 landmines destroyed by Sri Lanka under the Mine Ban Convention,” 1 October 2021.

[13] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, 2 June 2023, Forms F and G. This total includes some mines that were listed for training purposes. It is unclear if they were consumed during training, or if Sri Lanka decided not to retain these mines and destroyed them. The total in the Article 7 report is also stated as 129,216, however, adding the figures provided in Form F results in a total of 129,496.

[14] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, June 2021, Sections 3 and 4. The report states, “The quantity has decreased to 16,718 as a result of being used for training of mine detection dogs, training and testing on mechanical assets and equipment used in de-mining activities.”

[15] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, June 2021, Sections 3 and 4.

[16] In Sri Lanka’s June 2023 Article 7 Report, Form F, it reports an overall total of 129,496 antipersonnel landmines as having been destroyed, which is 9,107 more than was listed in its July 2022 report (120,389). Subtracting the number of retained mines consumed in 2022 from the difference between the total number of mines reported as destroyed in each of the two reports, appears to show that a further 4,443 mines have been destroyed by Sri Lanka, separate from those destroyed in mined areas. There was no additional explanation to clarify this discrepancy.

[17] Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, 21 July 2022, Form D; and Sri Lanka Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, 2 June 2023, Form D, pp. 4–5.


Support for Mine Action

Last updated: 20 December 2023

In 2022, Sri Lanka received US$17.5 million in international assistance for mine action from eight donors, down slightly from the $18 million received in 2021.[1]

The United States (US) was the largest donor, contributing $8.5 million, or almost half of total contributions. Japan and Germany each contributed more than $2 million. Only Japan provided support for victim assistance in 2022. Otherwise, all funds were allocated to capacity-building, clearance, and risk education activities.

International contributions: 2022[2]

Donor

Sector

Amount

(national currency)

Amount

(US$)

United States

Capacity-building, clearance, risk education

US$8,525,000

8,525,000

Japan

Capacity-building, clearance, victim assistance

¥348,825,960

2,653,498

Germany

Clearance

€2,015,000

2,122,601

Canada

Capacity-building, clearance, risk education

C$1,728,579

1,328,246

Norway

Clearance

NOK11,432,000

1,189,124

United Kingdom

Clearance

£635,832

786,588

Australia

Clearance

A$1,000,000

695,100

Switzerland

Capacity-building, clearance

CHF205,500

212,042

Total

 -

N/A

17,512,199

Note: N/A=not applicable.

Sri Lanka has never reported its national financial contribution to its mine action program.

Five-year support for mine action

In the five-year period from 2018–2022, international contributions to mine action in Sri Lanka totaled more than $74 million. The annual contribution more than doubled in 2019 to a total of $15 million, up from $7.3 million the previous year, and has remained above $15 million since then.

Summary of international contributions: 2018–2022[3]

Year

Amount (US$)

% change from previous year

2022

17,512,199

-3

2021

18,000,000

+10

2020

16,300,000

+9

2019

15,007,825

+105

2018

7,280,458

-14

Total

74,100,482

N/A

           Note: N/A=not applicable.

 


[1] Australia: Australia Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), Form J. Canada: Canada Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), Form J. Germany: Germany Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), Form J. Japan: response to Monitor questionnaire by Akifumi Fukuoka, Deputy Director, Conventional Arms Division, Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 7 September 2023. Norway: Norway Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), Form J. Switzerland: Switzerland Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), form I. United Kingdom: UK Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2022), Form I. United States: US Department of State, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement (PM/WRA), “To Walk the Earth in Safety: 1 October 2021–30 September 2022,” 4 April 2023. For Article 7 reports, see Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Database and Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Database.

[2] Average exchange rates for 2022: A$1=US$0.6951; €1=US$1.0534; NOK9.6138=US$1; C$1.3014=US$1; ¥131.4589=US$1; CHF0.9550=US$1; £1=US$1.2371. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 9 January 2023.

[3] See previous Support for Mine Action country profiles. ICBL-CMC, “Country Profiles: Sri Lanka,” undated; ICBL, Landmine Monitor 2022 (ICBL-CMC: Geneva, November 2022); and ICBL, Landmine Monitor 2021 (ICBL-CMC: Geneva, November 2021).